Could it be blackbody radiation? The large amperage current should produce an
extremely hot plasma within its path. The plasma would be expected to radiate
strongly in the visible and UV regions one would think. What reason is there
to suspect that anything unusual is happening with regard
Good point. As long as it takes a very tiny amount of precious metal the cost
could be contained. It would be much better to use one of the high mass
elements that is lower cost if you have any choice.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
To:
I find it difficult to compare the Papp engine with a Rossi ECAT. They are
very different in structure and behavior.
In the Papp there is obvious motion of the piston which could generate
electrical voltage by normal processes. The ECAT has no moving parts that I am
aware of.
This is not to
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:16 AM, David Roberson wrote:
Good point. As long as it takes a very tiny amount of precious metal the
> cost could be contained. It would be much better to use one of the high
> mass elements that is lower cost if you have any choice.
>
I suspect
http://newinflow.ru/pdf/Klimov_Poster.pdf
Regarding:
Heterogeneous plasmoid behind PVR nozzle is γ-radioactive. Soft X-radiation
100 ÷ 1 eV from this plasmoid. X-radiation decrement is very small
(radiation intensity decrease is about 20% at L = 100 cm).
This experiment shows that the
Here is a report on the Hydrodynamics device by Griggs:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/EPRIproceedingc.pdf#page=475
And here is a report by me:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6qvuFUMAp9HQTZUcFZzMmpTYms/view?usp=sharing
- Jed
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:12 AM, David Roberson wrote:
I find it difficult to compare the Papp engine with a Rossi ECAT. They are
> very different in structure and behavior.
They are definitely different in operation, but I would not be surprised to
learn that they work
The Papp engine and the E-Cat just work at different optical frequencies.
The E-Cat uses light in the infrared and the Papp engine in the XUV range.
The Papp system, like in the Holmlid experiment which is also a XUV based
system, there is a shock wave produced that reaches a significant fraction
after 3 days of absence, I have some problems
40 years ago I was faster and less rigid in thinking
see:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/11/20-nov-2015-updating-lenr-info.html
Happy to be with you again= things happen
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
I have a question Jed. You correct the input power from the AC source by
multiplying the actual power meter reading by the power factor as indicated on
the device. Are you certain that the original reading is in volt amperes
without being corrected? It would make sense for that actual
The assumption that underpins this claim is that there is only one
fundamental cause that produces the LENR reaction. This assumption is based
upon the existence of a set of globe properties that accompany any and all
LENR reactions. For example, the thermalization of gamma radiation is one
such
It is a bit premature to assume that all the LENR theories based upon hydrogen
are invalid! Until someone actually proves how every system operates this is
an open ended claim with very little supporting evidence. Perhaps you are
joking and I am taking you seriously Axil? :-) Or, could it be
http://newinflow.ru/pdf/Klimov_Poster.pdf
This experiment by Klimov is a wonderful proof that all the LENR theories
based on hydrogen are invalid. In this experiment, the LENR reaction
involves only argon and aluminum. The high voltage Tesla electric arc
produces a temperature of 7000K that
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:16 PM, David Roberson wrote:
You mention that gamma radiation is thermalized in some common manner. I
> still find it difficult to believe that any high energy gammas are
> generated during these reactions. How would all of these be captured?
Thank You for responding Eric. Yes, that is correct.
To me it makes a lot of sense.
I saw that Wikipedia has found it to be obsolete. As of 2015, the vast
majority of researchers openly reject plasma cosmology because it does not
match modern observations of astrophysical phenomena or accepted
newinflow.ru/pdf/Klimov_Poster.pdf
Regarding:
Heterogeneous plasmoid behind PVR nozzle is γ-radioactive. Soft X-radiation
100 ÷ 1 eV from this plasmoid. X-radiation decrement is very small
(radiation intensity decrease is about 20% at L = 100 cm).
This experiment shows that the
A valuable line of experimentation that Klimov can do is to go through the
list of metals the Piantelli gave us in his now revoked EuroPatent as
follows:
"The transition metal can be selected from the group comprised of: Sc, Ti,
V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, Pd, Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh, Ag, Cd,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
http://newinflow.ru/pdf/Klimov_Poster.pdf
>
> This experiment by Klimov is a wonderful proof that all the LENR theories
> based on hydrogen are invalid.
>
In order for this to be true, we must assume that Klimov et al. are
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
This line of thinking also might open up the possibility that might lead to
> a optical based chain reaction.
>
This is an interesting idea. If XUV is triggering LENR in some cases, and
the resulting LENR reaction produces
Now I understand. Of course Dr. Storms and others would argue that hydrogen is
a key component of the reaction. On the other hand he also supports your
assertion that only one process is likely to be occurring.
I see conflicting evidence with respect to what underlies the reactions at this
I agree, if one of those reactions is possible it would make us wish that LENR
was a hoax!
I suspect that the positive feedback occurring is too easy to trigger so that a
large amount of energy can not be released in any one reaction chain. If I
recall correctly, the plutonium bomb required a
LeClair has identified a microparticle of water with a structure much like
rydberg matter that forms during cavitation bubble collapse. It is this
microparticle which forms SPPs on its surface that results in the LRNR
reaction.
LeClair has micrographed this particle. In fact, this water particle
http://phys.org/news/2015-11-supercomputing-strange-difference-antimatter.html
The standard model predicts just a few kaons out of a million will survive
the creation process and CP symmetry violation. But Holmlid produced 10
billion per laser shot. Could LENR be what has produced the matter in
http://phys.org/news/2015-11-supercomputing-strange-difference-antimatter.html
The standard model predicts just a few kaons out of a million will survive
the creation process and CP symmetry violation. But Holmlid produced 10
billion per laser shot. Could LENR be what has produced the matter in
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/12/141216123829.htm
Carnegie's Ivan Naumov and Russell Hemley discover hydrogen forms grapheme
layers/clusters instead of metal under pressure.
This is an experimental validation of the Rydberg matter structure of
hydrogen.
Instead of high pressures,
Many good news.
Phonon Energy proposal is interesting...
A Klimov technology too.
2015-11-20 18:35 GMT+01:00 Peter Gluck :
> after 3 days of absence, I have some problems
> 40 years ago I was faster and less rigid in thinking
> see:
>
26 matches
Mail list logo