[Vo]:Stephen Wolfram musing on what spacetime really is

In his latest blog post, What Is Spacetime, Really?, Stephen gives some thought to what's at the bottom. Interesting ideas (it isn't turtles, BTW), but then as a layman I've always thought that his A New Kind of Science had something to say whereas many seemed to pan it. |   | |   | |   |  

[Vo]:Re: Stephen Wolfram musing on what spacetime really is

Hmm, I guess the vortex list can't handle sending as HTML since the links seem to be gone. Anyhow, here they are: http://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2015/12/what-is-spacetime-really https://www.wolframscience.com -- Adrian

[Vo]:to push LENR from phenomenological to phenomenal

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/12/dec-8-2015-to-push-lenr-from.html this issue is targeting sad and angry replicators first Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

RE: [Vo]:Blast from the past -

Robin - Go for it. Here is a site for the relevant frequencies for maximum water resonance. The wavelength of a typical oven magnetron is unfortunately too long. For recycling water vapor in air- a practical resonance is 183 GHz - about 100 times better than the oven, which can be achieved with

[Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

Phone charger version.Heh, buy a bunch as xmas gifts! http://dispatchesfromthefuture.com/2015/12/steorn_taking_orders_for_ocube_preorders.html http://boingboing.net/2015/12/08/free-energy-for-sale-steorn.html http://steornnews.com/ https://www.facebook.com/Orbo-217496297671/timeline/

RE: [Vo]:Blast from the past -

Robin, rather than use a piston engine for this concept, it might be possible to convert a motorcycle turbocharger to "burn" water vapor. These are low-priced- check eBay. This could be closed-cycle and would probably work best at a partial vacuum for better ionization. Here is a site for the

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:18 PM, wrote: Note that with alpha fusion some extra energy is available, so I suppose > that in > theory that means you could start a little lower, however that would also > not be > spontaneous fission, but rather triggered fission. > Agreed. The

Re: [Vo]:Blast from the past -

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 28 Nov 2015 07:45:02 -0800: Hi, Actually this invention has all that would be needed for Hydrino production. The microwaves ionize some water molecules creating free H atoms which could then be catalyzed by other free water molecules. The ensuing VUV and

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:18:31 -0600: Hi, Note that with alpha fusion some extra energy is available, so I suppose that in theory that means you could start a little lower, however that would also not be spontaneous fission, but rather triggered fission. If you

[Vo]:LENR under Nonassociative Quantum Mechanics.

*Physicists investigate unusual form of quantum mechanics* *http://phys.org/news/2015-12-physicists-unusual-quantum-mechanics.html * *"Nonassociative quantum mechanics has been of mathematical interest for some time (and has

Re: [Vo]:Steorn: Orbo 28th October 2015 Transcript from Webinar

Hi Marcus! Sure! I know at least two organizations who are going to purchase one. One is in Australia, and another is in Finland. The Finns have a crowdfund project. https://mesenaatti.me/en/steornin-ikiliikkujatekniikan-tutkimusprojekti/ <- I'm trying to get in to record the electromagnetic

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

On Tue, 8 Dec 2015, Terry Blanton wrote: Sorry, Bill, Shaun (Sean) McCarthy just announce that they won't be available until late January. DON'T BUY! Seriously. Steorn appears to be making Volta's mistake. (Or, it's a devious hoax based on Volta's mistake.) Alessandro Volta believed

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

Sorry, Bill, Shaun (Sean) McCarthy just announce that they won't be available until late January. On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:29 PM, William Beaty wrote: > > Phone charger version.Heh, buy a bunch as xmas gifts! > > >

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

Bill, is that based on what you read on the transcripts? They do state that it seems like a galvanic cell but doesn't work like it. Also, other claims seem to be: 1- the materials are piezoelectric / receptive to ambient energy 2- not RF / energy harvesting, their layered metal thingies work

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

Http://freeenergy.news/steorn-webinar-ii-orbo-products-full-transcript/ Here is a transcript i wrote for webinar#2 of Steorn Orbo And webinar#1 is at http://freeenergy.news/steorn/steorn-o-cube-webinar-full-transcript/ Sent from some iDevice. Written by Esa. > On 09 Dec 2015, at 01:29,

Re: [Vo]:Steorn Orbo cube phone-charger ~$1300

Bill, here's another claim from Shaun McCarthy: A: You will never need to charge an ophone Q: Why? What’s the reason behind it? A: Orbo is a completely new type of battery based on the electric field rather than traditional batteries that are based upon chemical release of energy. --- | Esa

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

I had in mind atomic mass (i.e., nuclides in the neighborhood of zirconium). I got this tidbit from Wikipedia (second paragraph): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_fission I have now added a reference to this page in the paper. Wikipedia shows "(SF)" in some cases for isotopes in this

Re: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter?

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Mon, 7 Dec 2015 22:20:18 -0600: Hi Eric, In the sentence "Spontaneous fission becomes energetically possible at atomic masses greater than 92." Do mean "masses" or "numbers". IOW are you talking about Uranium and up, or upward of about Zirconium? >For those