Re: [Vo]:Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test

2016-05-16 Thread Robert Dorr
Jed, Why would it matter what the person using the heat does with it. All you should be concerned with is the temperature of the out flowing fluid/steam and it's rate of flow and the temperature of the incoming water and it's rate of flow. You could have a wall with two holes and two

Re: [Vo]:Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test

2016-05-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: > No importance?!? Any person with a half a brain would inspect the > customer's equipment and confirm that it is actually using 600 kW of > process heat as claimed. > I meant 1 MW, not 600 kW. 600 is the number of square meters in the customer's side of the plant, which was reportedly

Re: [Vo]:Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test

2016-05-16 Thread Lennart Thornros
Jed, I think you take the prize. Mats has produced a report from interviewing one of the parties in the conflct. Insane and an idiot - maybe as Peter Gluck suggested you don't really mean what you say. It is a metaphor. I hope so. There are two interviews one by Mats with open references to whom

Re: [Vo]:Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test

2016-05-16 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Quoting Mats Lewan's report: > > "IH never had access to the customer’s area. At the end of the test, an > expert hired by IH, insisted that it was important to know where the water > came from and where it was used.

Re: [Vo]:Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test

2016-05-16 Thread Jed Rothwell
Quoting Mats Lewan's report: "IH never had access to the customer’s area. At the end of the test, an expert hired by IH, insisted that it was important to know where the water came from and where it was used. The ERV explained that this had no importance." This is flat out insane. This is one of

[Vo]:CONTRIBUTION FROM V. VYSOTSKII, NEW DISPUTE GENERATOR LAUNCHED<,

2016-05-16 Thread Peter Gluck
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-16-2016-opinion-about-andrea-rossi.html the dispute generator is paper 10) by Mats Lewan but it is more today.. best peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test

2016-05-16 Thread a.ashfield
This got left off my original post. Read Mats full report here. https://animpossibleinvention.com/2016/05/16/rossi-makes-offer-on-swedish-factory-building-plus-more-updates/

[Vo]:Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test

2016-05-16 Thread a.ashfield
The threads about whether the I MW plant have got long and convoluted so I’m starting another one.Also my comment there keep being moved down to the bottom of the list that makes following the answers difficult. Mats Lewan has met with Rossi in Sweden and has reported a number of new facts.

<    1   2