Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

LENR will redefine a goodly amount of our current science. Unfortunately because of this new paradigm in science, LENR is very esoteric. To support my assertion, this following reference shows that the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) quasiparticle produces a monopole magnetic field.

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

He didn't seem to display 2017-04-01 22:20 GMT-03:00 Daniel Rocha : > Useless aggressiveness. It's not impossible, it is just that he seem to > display this kind of knowledge before. So, working with a specialist, did > good to him. He seemed to answer in a more casual way

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

Useless aggressiveness. It's not impossible, it is just that he seem to display this kind of knowledge before. So, working with a specialist, did good to him. He seemed to answer in a more casual way about some nuclear phenomena than before. 2017-04-01 21:43 GMT-03:00 a.ashfield

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

Axil, So you say, and I don't mean that disparagingly. I don't know and don't have the time to investigate those esoteric theories well enough to understand if they are right. As far as I know, no one has ever demonstrated a magnetic monopole but some talk about them as real. The proof is

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

Partly true. A lot of your professors probably went to school about that time. I went to college before that. I suppose it is impossible for you to consider that one could keep up to date in a subject if motivated to do so. In passing. General Relativity was discovered 1905 - 1915. AA

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

There is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and a magnetic field formatted to support monopole flux lines. The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a monopole formated magnetic field). This SmCo5 type

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

I mean, not after the theory of neutrinos was conceived in the standard model. 2017-04-01 19:42 GMT-03:00 Daniel Rocha : > That's philosophy of relativity. And that's from the 70's, not long after > it was inventive. Moreover, you don't need to know particle physics to >

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

That's philosophy of relativity. And that's from the 70's, not long after it was inventive. Moreover, you don't need to know particle physics to study relativity. 2017-04-01 16:39 GMT-03:00 a.ashfield : > Rossi got a PhD in Philosophy with a thesis on relativity. I have

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

Axil, I am not able to judge the properties of many of these smaller particles. They seem to be more a matter of the individual's belief than pinned down by experiment. Let me know when someone /proves/ the existence of a magnetic monopole. AA On 4/1/2017 3:39 PM, Axil Axil wrote: Rossi

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

Rossi et al are confusing cause and effect. The strong and the weak force produce nuclear change and the subatomic particles are the effects of how those forces function. The strong and the weak force produce the pion, muons, and mesons that Rossi is now factoring into his theory. But these

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

Rossi got a PhD in Philosophy with a thesis on relativity. I have no reason to think he didn't know something of atomic physics for many years. AA On 4/1/2017 3:13 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: I am not being snarky. I am just stating something evident. And you seem to forget that I side with Rossi

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

I am not being snarky. I am just stating something evident. And you seem to forget that I side with Rossi and I think all is wrong with IH "evidences". 2017-04-01 13:51 GMT-03:00 a.ashfield : > Why be so snarky? You have no clue when Rossi learnt that. Jumping to >

[Vo]:about the Ssmell...and info

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-01-2017-lenr-about-smell-and-info.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

Why be so snarky? You have no clue when Rossi learnt that. Jumping to conclusions on such flimsy evidence does nothing for your credibility. AA On 3/31/2017 6:10 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: Not really a big deal. That's a merely cursory knowledge of particle physics. He probably learned about

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

This conjecture also gives new meaning to the phrase 'cold fusion', if the adjective 'cold' qualifies the output rather than the input. ;-) Harry On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:46 AM, H LV wrote: