LENR will redefine a goodly amount of our current science. Unfortunately because of this new paradigm in science, LENR is very esoteric.
To support my assertion, this following reference shows that the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) quasiparticle produces a monopole magnetic field. Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 9:01 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil, > So you say, and I don't mean that disparagingly. I don't know and don't > have the time to investigate those esoteric theories well enough to > understand if they are right. As far as I know, no one has ever > demonstrated a magnetic monopole but some talk about them as real. The > proof is less convincing to me than that Rossi 's E-Cat works. In both > cases I'd rather wait and see. > > AA > > On 4/1/2017 7:30 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > There is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a monopole > quasiparticle like the SPP, and a magnetic field formatted to support > monopole flux lines. > > The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field > (almost a monopole formated magnetic field). > > This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force. > > That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction. > > To refresh your memory, see > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg108069.html > > > On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 6:36 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Axil, >> I am not able to judge the properties of many of these smaller >> particles. They seem to be more a matter of the individual's belief than >> pinned down by experiment. Let me know when someone *proves* the >> existence of a magnetic monopole. >> >> AA >> >> >> On 4/1/2017 3:39 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >> >> Rossi et al are confusing cause and effect. The strong and the weak force >> produce nuclear change and the subatomic particles are the effects of how >> those forces function. The strong and the weak force produce the pion, >> muons, and mesons that Rossi is now factoring into his theory. But these >> particles are just the effects of what the strong force is doing in LENR. >> LENR is a condition where the strong force changes the way it behaves. The >> particles are the results of this change in behavior. >> >> Professional science states the the fundamental forces of nature cannot >> change unless they are affected by the application of extremes in energy. >> If enough energy is present, then the fundamental forces will gradually >> become unified. This is the main tenet in supersymmetry. >> >> But as witnessed by LENR, the fundamental forces do not behave in this >> way. As Rossi states, these forces change when a special type of magnetism >> is applied to the fundamental forces of nature. Rossi has picked the >> quadrupole magnetic force as the factor that changes the action of the >> fundamental forces. This pick is wrong. But informed by other LENR >> experimentation, we know that the proper LENR active magnetic force format >> is the monopole magnetic force. >> >> But we must give him his due, Rossi is very close to having LENR theory >> correct in its most basic aspects. >> >> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I am not being snarky. I am just stating something evident. And you seem >>> to forget that I side with Rossi and I think all is wrong with IH >>> "evidences". >>> >>> 2017-04-01 13:51 GMT-03:00 a.ashfield <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Why be so snarky? You have no clue when Rossi learnt that. Jumping to >>>> conclusions on such flimsy evidence does nothing for your credibility. >>>> >>>> AA >>>> >>>> On 3/31/2017 6:10 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: >>>> >>>> Not really a big deal. That's a merely cursory knowledge of particle >>>> physics. He probably learned about this when writing his last paper. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>> [email protected] >>> >> >> >> > >
