Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers.

[Daniel Rocha]

This is over optimism based on the moderate success of translation of non
creative writing.Most science and news reports, is very mechanical. We are
born with mechanism that universally holds for every language, in terms of
organizing adjectives, substantives, agreements. What the machine does is
to identify this elements in a language using statistics based on
collections, and parse the equivalent to another language, also based on
statistics.

Now writing, specially creative writting relies on context. Guessing what
will happen, as it is alleged in the text, won't make anything worth.

Re: [Vo]:Robots to replace writers.

[H LV]

​The Precariat and Class Struggle By Guy Standing

Abstract: The world economy is in the midst of a Global Transformation that
is producing a new global class structure. A new mass class is emerging –
the precariat – characterised by chronic uncertainty and insecurity.
Although the precariat is still a class-in-the-making, divided within
itself, its elements are united in rejecting old mainstream political
traditions. To become a transformative class, however, the precariat needs
to move beyond the primitive rebel stage manifested in 2011 and become
enough of a class-for-itself to be a power for change. This will involve a
struggle for redistribution of the key assets needed for a good life in a
good society in the twenty-first century –not the “means of production”,
but socioeconomic security, control of time, quality space, knowledge (or
education), financial knowledge and financial capital.​

http://www.guystanding.com/files/documents/Precariat_and_Class_Struggle_final_English.pdf


On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Che  wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>
>> https://thenextweb.com/contributors/2017/05/19/artificial-
>> intelligence-will-impact-professional-writing/
>>
>> How Artificial Intelligence will impact professional writing
>>
>
>
> As I keep pointing out: such technological developments could only
> constitute a 'crisis' in a society where every Human being is NOT
> guaranteed a lifetime quality-of-life. And Capitalism -- being a system of
> institutionalized *artificial* scarcity, benefiting ONLY a tiny,
> self-interested elite -- IS that infernal society.
>
> Therefore we NEED and REQUIRE *Socialism* in order to advance as a species.
>
> But as things stand -- the U.S. Imperialists are working overtime to snuff
> us all, at the moment...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:
>>
>>> http://nypost.com/2017/08/29/artificial-intelligence-is-writ
>>> ing-the-next-game-of-thrones-book/
>>>
>>> Artificial intelligence is writing the next ‘Game of Thrones’ book
>>>
>>
>>
>

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Google’s AI is Learning to Make Other AI

[H LV]

Alain wrote

"help you earn your life"

This is an expression of subservience . Everyone seeks a master, but
individual people differ in who or what they choose as their master. Some
people prefer a boss, some prefer church, some prefer the master of
science, some prefer the marketplace, etc. Each person should have the
economic security to choose or reject a master.

Harry

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Alain Sepeda 
wrote:

> there are already software, using advance mathematical technique to
> replace programmer who code software with assembler, even for parallel code.
>
> We call that compilers, and I use it, even if there was hard resistance at
> the beginning.
> This did not kill IT work, who now develop complex system with real time
> optimizer executing bytecode created from specifications...
>
> the future of AI is like the future of donkey, that you use one to help
> you earn your life.
>
> the tragedy of AI, like the tragedy of donkey, would be that common people
> refuse to buy a share of an AI, to run an AI, to exploit an AI, and prefer
> to stay subordinate of a boss.
>
>
> By the way sometime I think that using an AI to replace a journalist would
> improve the results, because sometime I see "journal de reference" behave
> worst than Breitbart News or facebook algorithm, because they are more
> activists than relays and analysts.
>
> When you see what have been the blackswan TOP50, I suspect that an AI
> would be more creative than many producers, or at least less expensive for
> same result.
> Best producer for me is the audience.
>
>
> 2017-10-11 8:09 GMT+02:00 Axil Axil :
>
>> https://futurism.com/googles-ai-is-learning-to-make-other-ai/
>>
>> Google’s AI is Learning to Make Other AI
>>
>> "Even more, as this development indicates, not just low-skill jobs are
>> on the chopping block. There are currently AI systems being developed that
>> can replace film editors
>> 
>> , songwriters
>> 
>> , journalists
>> ,
>> and much more. And now, with AI that is capable of creating AI better than
>> humans, we all need to be a little more observant and aware of what’s on
>> the horizon."
>>
>
>