Interesting references. It reminded me of something I recalled from one of
my EM classes many years ago where the professor injected that adding a 5th
Dimension allowed for the unification of EM and Gravity and the basis for a
theory of everything. Later learning that it was Kaluza-Klien theory
Kaluza-Klein has been started by Einstein too but it/he failed due to
misunderstanding the nature of time in mass.
As in GR where S^3 is the solution topology he did go to S^4 the other
failure in thinking as a simply connected surface cannot carry/ be
smoothly covered by flux due to
It is referred to as 5th density; not 5th dimension. Torsion, (or toroidal,)
fields were actually expounded upon by Russian scientist, (Shipov, Heim,
Kozarev, etc.) who did EXTENSIVE research and experimentation on torsion
fields. This throws string theory out the window and explains the
Cosmic strings in a garage-lab?
The main thing seemingly missing from Maxwell is ...closed ring-defects or
"smoke rings." They appear in fluids, but not in fluid-analogy for EM
fields. Some amperes trapped in a superconducting ring are similar, but
b-fields are not EM Torsion. Hugo
The main problem with classic thinking is people cannot escape their
mind or what they are able to see.
The full extent of EM theory can only be grasped in higher dimension than 4.
As a starter you can dig into Maxwell on S^3 :
https://www.math.upenn.edu/grad/dissertations/ParsleyThesis.pdf.
5 matches
Mail list logo
