At 2:39 PM 10/8/4, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Honestly, I just glanced at the Hydrogen Program Plan and did some very
quick back-of-the-envelope estimates. I came up with 15 or 20 nuke plants.
Jones Beene estimated 7, which is probably closer to the mark. I forgot
that a nuclear plant produces three
Horace Heffner wrote:
I found it surprising that the DOE Annual Energy Review:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pdf/03842002.pdf
shows a steady INCREASE in nuclear power generation in the US. Somehow I
was under the (wrong) impression nuclear power generation was on the wane,
due to plant
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 22:09:09 -0500, you wrote:
BlankWylie asks if I have an interesting viewpoint on the subject.
No, just the ongoing dialogue mentioned with a since passed geologist
friend.
Your interest leads me to believe that you have some views. Please
feel free to express them here.
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 12:35:41 -0500, you wrote:
Oops...
Hit the wrong button; sorry!
--
John Fields
Wasn't itMark Twain who, in a long letter to someone, apologized for
its length by stating that he didn't have enough time to write a shorter note?
Well, consider this to be a similar apology in the era of email where with the
availability of "cut and past," it seems thatshort but meaningful
Dear Vortexians,
I am quite sorry I ever got into this thing, and if I
have wasted bandwidth, I do apologize. This will
likely be my last message on this subject.
snip Iraq did not attack us, etc.
period.
The addition of the word 'period' makes it that much
clearer then? No, Iraq did not
Jones wrote:
Interesting point from M.C. :
With all this talk about ethanol and hydrogen, let me take
note of the water
bath calorimetry experiments of Mills which showed a heat
release from
hydrogen 100 times greater than by combustion of the same
amount of
hydrogen.
The only
7 matches
Mail list logo
