Your neighbor may be interested in:
http://jlnlabs.imars.com/plasma/index.htm
-john
-Original Message-
From: thomas malloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:43 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Sing the Sun Electric
Terry Blanton posted;
>Not everyone bel
well, ive made ball lightning in a glass before (see bills wonderful
website) but in metal?
On 4/28/05, thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Terry Blanton posted;
>
> >Not everyone believes fusion powers the sun:
>
> Excellent post Terry. I have a neighbor, John T Nordberg,
> www.granduni
Mr. Bush on Social Security...tonite.
/ Mr Bush sez:
In a reformed Social System, voluntary personal retirement
accounts would offer workers a number of investment options
that are simple and easy to understand.
I know some Americans have reservations about investing
in the stock market, so
Observing the vortex produced in a clear plexiglas tank of water by a high
speed rotating member facing down with a clockwise rotation I notice the cone of
the vortex is at the surface and counterclockwise due to the vortex
curling 180 degrees from the face of the rotating member up to the
Terry Blanton posted;
Not everyone believes fusion powers the sun:
Excellent post Terry. I have a neighbor, John T Nordberg,
www.grandunification.com , well he lives in the western burbs, who
has the intention to create a "light ball", in a metallic container.
If I see a bright flash coming fro
This is hilarious...
The Economist article is titled: "Cold fusion -
Honest!"
I haven't seen the Science article yet, but the title looks like it too,
is relating the story to cold fusion.
The UCLA team should have given their work a nifty name like
"Crystal Fusion" to give the press something t
Could this similarity to sonofusion be part of
Putterman's nefarious agenda... you remember, in his
recent downplaying of normal sonofusion. This guy
could end up being a "bad actor" in terms of
intellectual-greed, so to speak... but thanks to the
internet his past deeds will likely catch up with
In the May 2005 issue of IEEE Spectrum, Taleyarkhan and
Lahey discuss their latest experiments in detail and also explain how they plan
to turn their tabletop apparatus into a full-scale electricity-generating
device. "If this proves possible--and it's still a big 'if'--sonofusion
could bec
--- Jed Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Beaty wrote:
>
> That is what I love about computers. They never
> forget! If we ever win the
> CF wars, all of the stupid comments by harsh
> opposition skeptics will be
> preserved for posterity.
Hi Jed,
You once posted me a copy of the S
Hey Mike,
Good point; it's just that I was staring at an old
x-ray xformer when I posted that's about 100KV or so; even my
solid state 50KV Glassman is kinda hefty, but as you
say it's the current that adds the bulk. I do sort
of regret buying that old boat anchor; but you
know sometimes you just
Looks like Taleyarkhan and Lahey are coming through
with additional peer reviewed proof that so many seemed sure they would never be
able to provide.
In the May 2005 issue of IEEE Spectrum, they
discuss their latest experiments in detail and also explain how they plan to
turn their table
Hello Keith,
Well yes, but I don't think it would take anywhere
near 50lbs of power supply to reach the tiny
currents generated by lithium tantalate. For
that matter, why not just use the PZT from one of
those gas flame lighters. PZT is a slightly
better pyroelectric, no? And besides, why no
yeah, well, this is a topic for humor and a bit ot, so hey.
/didnt know that though. makes one wonder, then mary wasnt really the
mother of christ. wait... nicean... yeah, constantine can go jump in
a lake.
On 4/28/05, Stephen A. Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> leaking pen wrote:
leaking pen wrote:
but, as a son of adam and eve in part, would jesus not also hold some
aspect of original sin? in fact, his creation would never have been
neccesary if not for that bite from the fruit of knowledge of good and
evil, yes no?
No. Check out the Nicene Creed. Jesus was begotten,
but, as a son of adam and eve in part, would jesus not also hold some
aspect of original sin? in fact, his creation would never have been
neccesary if not for that bite from the fruit of knowledge of good and
evil, yes no? (which, btw, was a fig, not an apple) so why not the
mac?
/jesus loves y
am i the only one laughing at the irony of that statement?
/looking up irony to be sure it was in fact ironic. still not sure.
On 4/28/05, Jed Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> leaking pen wrote:
>
> >i will say this once again, and then i will ignore you. this is a
> >SCIENCE discussion lis
Hi Michael,
About 50 pounds of iron, and a wall outlet.
You could warm the pyroelectric crystal with your
hands and generate neutrons.
But there is no new physics here, sadly. You are
not missing anything.
K.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thurs
Am I missing something? What is the advantage of
using the pyroelectric crystal as a high voltage
source over some other more conventional power
supply?
M.
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
Terry,
I'm searching without results for the "think different" ad
with Anton LaVey. You know the one, you animal... Can
you work your linking magic It's gotta be out
there somewhere.
K.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:
See:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Savvatimovresultsofa.pdf
This may need some additional editing. If anyone here finds a mistake in
it, please let me know toot-sweet, as they say in the South of France.
- Jed
Not that this topic is likely to have anything to do with "CF", "OU", "LENR" or
other kool vortexian acronyms... Never the less, I just couldn't help sharing
it with all of you:
I give you: Exploding TOADS
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7654561/?GT1=6428
spontaneous toadie combustion?
Regards,
>
> From: "Keith Nagel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/04/28 Thu PM 01:42:49 EDT
> To:
> Subject: RE: Computers and Religion
>
> But Hank,
>
> You're neglecting the key theological issue.
>
> Did Jesus or Satan use the Mac?
Uh, you can look at the Mac logo and ask that question?
Jesus sav
But Hank,
You're neglecting the key theological issue.
Did Jesus or Satan use the Mac?
/
Some important theological questions are answered if we think of god as a
computer programmer.
Q: Does God control everything that happens in my life?
A: He cou
Jesus and Satan were having an
on-going argument about who was better on the computer. They had been going
at it for days, and frankly God was tired of hearing all the bickering.
Finally fed up, God said, "THAT'S
IT! I have had enough. I am going to set up a test that will run for two
--- Keith,
> The voltages quoted seem lower than what we
> were looking at yesterday, 120KV is something you
> could do in the dentists office.
The Farnsworth fusor puts out 10 orders of magnitude
more neutrons than this device does, and at only 20-40
kV... BUT it benefits from **spherical conver
Hi Jones,
Here's some fresh links for ya.
http://www.aip.org/pnu/2005/split/729-1.html
http://technocrat.net/article.pl?sid=05/04/27/2025254&mode=thread
And your link,
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/28/science/28fusion.html?
The voltages quoted seem lower than what we
were looking at yesterday,
There is an excellent story in the NY Times (Kenneth
Chang) today on the UCLA device, which, although
developed in the acoustics lab by sonofusion expert
Putterman, is basically just a small deuterium
accelerator and ICF target.
side note: ...is "putterman" a great name for a
sonofusion guy or wha
leaking pen wrote:
i will say this once again, and then i will ignore you. this is a
SCIENCE discussion list. you wish a religous debate, join a list
designed for religious debate.
Amen.
- Jed
William Beaty wrote:
Vortex-L archives have your original message announcing successful
closed-loop operation. And successful rotating-wheel-device operation!
See below.
That is what I love about computers. They never forget! If we ever win the
CF wars, all of the stupid comments by harsh opposit
once again, you have FAILED TO ANSWER THE QUESTION. a statement that
is patently false has been made, and no explanation has been given.
i toe no party line, and will not argue the shortcomings of many of
darwins thoughts. i simply do not like seeing obvious falsehoods
about ANYONES work. as for
Not everyone believes fusion powers the sun:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/050427sun.htm
"More than 60 years ago, Dr. Charles E. R. Bruce, of the Electrical Research
Association in England, offered a new perspective on the Sun. An electrical
researcher, astronomer, and expert on
http://cbs2.com/water/watercooler_story_116173449.html
Apr 26, 2005 2:13 pm US/Pacific
BREMERTON, WA (AP) A company in Washington State wants to send an elevator into
space.
The LiftPort company says it will open a plant this summer in Millville, New
Jersey, to start producing nanotube fibers,
William Beaty wrote:
Vortex-L archives have your original message announcing successful
closed-loop operation. And successful rotating-wheel-device operation!
See below.
To all: while reading this, keep in mind that it all happened eight
years ago and we've yet to see evidence that his devices ev
Not Greg, but an imposter?
Or more likely, you are actually Greg Watson, but you lied on vortex-L
years ago about closing the loop on SMOT, and now you don't remember the
number of seconds/hours/days that you told us the device ran back then.
> However when I finish the single
> ramp return dev
Vortex-L archives have your original message announcing successful
closed-loop operation. And successful rotating-wheel-device operation!
See below.
To all: while reading this, keep in mind that it all happened eight
years ago and we've yet to see evidence that his devices ever existed.
Keep ask
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Prometheus Effect wrote:
>
> > I can only report on what I achieved and from memory
> > it was not stable.
So then, stable or not, what was *your* record for
number of closed-loop roll-arounds?
> Sorry but I don't have my original notes so I can't
> give you more info.
Hm
--- Bob Fickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not just dispense with the ramps altogether,
and instead mount the"ball" on the rim of a
bicycle-size wheel- using the smoothest bearingsyou
can find, and very lightweight construction? That way
the "return" is free, with less friction than you've
please, dont refer to my "teachers". i based my statements off my own
reading of darwins work. only way to interpret or critique someones
work is to actually read it yourself. in addition, you assume much,
that i agree with all darwins theories, that i dont speak other
languages, the form of my
38 matches
Mail list logo
