Re: [Vo]: Henry Paul Sprain Magnetic Motor

At 09:24 pm 21/06/2006 -0400, Stephen wrote: Patrick Vessey wrote: [snip covered previously] OK, I picked a poor msg to illustrate my point. Try this one: ---quote--- [snip] Have you even seen my motor? Because your questions make no sense. There is no flywheel at all. What the

RE: [Vo]: Paul Sprain Magnetic Motor (Y! mails)

Stephen wrote: And if he's really got a working perpetual motion machine of the first kind, why's he wasting his time arguing about it on the internet? Surely there's some better way to apply it? A couple of points: 1) It's obviously possible to spoof someone's identity via mail. Somebody

[Vo]: Re: More Waterfuel videos

Jones wrote: I am planning on trying to prove/disprove that part of the equation (pretreatment) soon. A simple but meaningful test would be something like this: Prepare several batches of 100 gram (or more) water samples - and then heat for exactly one minute each in a microwave oven -

Re: [VO]:Re: Vortex fields

-Original Message- From: RC Macaulay Give us a suggestion on how you imagine  creating interference.. Interesting thought! If you had two synchronous sources of energy you could have them interfere constructively (combine) by adjusting the distance between them. However, I know

[Vo]: Pensioner's UFO plans scuppered

Vorts, See: http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/216/216371_pensioners_ufo_plans_scuppered.html or http://tinyurl.com/lb449 Worth commenting on? Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.Zazzle.com/orionworks

Re: [Vo]: Read it again

Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: A successful exchange in a science group is, IMHO, one in which I learn something. This one's been successful ;-) Ditto! Remember, E and B fields (apparently!) follow the law of superposition, which means overlapping fields themselves don't interact; they

Re: [Vo]: Pensioner's UFO plans scuppered

I agree with the judge and the Patent Office, which demanded to see a working model. People who make this kind of claim are obliged to prove it, unless they have some legitimate excuse. For example, if a prototype would cost millions of dollars, the inventor cannot be expected to make one, but

[Vo]: [VO];Re: Vortex fields

Richard wrote.. Give us a suggestion on how you imagine creating interference.. Interesting thought!If you had two synchronous sources of energy you could have them interfere constructively (combine) by adjusting the distance between them. However, I know of no way to synchronize

[Vo]: Re: Read it again

- Original Message - From: George Holz Stephen Lawrence If my mental picture is right, then a free electron's dipole must be aligned with the external field (parallel or antiparallel). This is experimentally observed but is something that I find extremely strange. Although one of

Re: [Vo]: Re: Read it again

Jones Beene wrote: - Original Message - From: George Holz Stephen Lawrence If my mental picture is right, then a free electron's dipole must be aligned with the external field (parallel or antiparallel). This is experimentally observed but is something that I find extremely

[Vo]:

vgqWyh1dYIIh6LByeS03SZl1Hf6gheQYpT2Hd9jp76o4KDQ2gkU9xXZSV62jcM7KXgIfWkg0pHy4 wqstmnWBjEtxjO5vTNiovQzFlN0BZqcuRNJ3WKpXNO02TlTaTLUAI38oSG7MX2j15U7scunYKB80OKP sW2z2tMtZLclxwfTCiwlev3P1vd4XxHoEbcApkxDSmIc6mpaXhXrh78xUSclHxyRquZVEi