That is great news!
I have not listened to the interview.
All the more likely they have done what they claim.
Mark
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Steorm
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:54:36 +1000
In reply to
I hope you're right, IMO if it isn't closed loop they shouldn't have released it until they have that covered.It will only really be useful once they have it power it's self, this will also mean that the sceptical jury is far far more likely to come back with a positive result, not that I think
Some numbers to ponder, Jones.
It takes less than 2.5 eV to electrolyze water as opposed to the 498 kJ/mole
(5.17 eV) H-OH bond energy.
OTOH, theAg-O bond energy is 2.38 eV and the Ag-H bond energy
is 2.23 eV.
It has been experimentally verified that water dissociates to
adsorbed H and OH on
On 8/26/06, John Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are indicators against this being a scam though,
Not a scam; but, a well chiseled lead-in to the next season of Lost.
Do you remember the magnetic effect in the last episode? eg
Terry
Robin, Harry, Clocks run by turning gears having force applied to the gear train, and if a gear starts skipping teeth from vibration, the clock will loose time or not operate as the only way to skip a tooth is if that tooth is missing. Vibration has nothing to do with the timekeeping ability
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:22:50 -0700, Mark Goldes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When ABC News published critical comments by Dr. Michio Kaku, McCarthy
invited him to participate.To my knowledge he has not yet indicates if
he will.
Mark
Kaku isn't an experimental physicist -- he's theoretical.
Fred,
Recombination of 2 OH to form HOOH is 2.2 eV per bond (213
kJ/mole) is lost energy ...
But it isn't lost if it supplies the energy (recycling the
catalyst) needed to dissociate the O from the M-O, for instance.
Or, from you original post about your experience with Manganese
Title: Re: [Vo]: Half baked idea
Here is a more accurate account:
http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/14766
Harry
Christopher Arnold wrote:
Robin, Harry,
Clocks run by turning gears having force applied to the gear train, and if a gear starts skipping teeth
At 03:47 pm 27/08/2006 -0500, you wrote:
Here is a more accurate account:
http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/14766
Harry
Well done. There's no arguing with that one, eh! 8-)
Frank
Harry,Very good link. What I was commenting on was "ALL the clocks in a clock shop self synchronizing" - which the link specifically referred to only two clocks on the same plank if the conditions were just right and the cases were not heavy, the pendulums would swing in opposite - which is
In reply to Christopher Arnold's message of Sun, 27 Aug 2006
14:57:21 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
Harry,
Very good link. What I was commenting on was ALL the clocks in a clock shop
self synchronizing - which the link specifically referred to only two clocks
on the same plank if the conditions were
Robin
In other words the list in general has ignored the
main features of my original post, and concentrated on the
trivia.
Not at all. Lack of comment from the list on good ideas seldom
implies either.
In reply to John Berry's message of Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:54:42
+1200:
Hi,
I hope you're right, IMO if it isn't closed loop they shouldn't have
released it until they have that covered.
It will only really be useful once they have it power it's self, this will
Not only do they claim that is
13 matches
Mail list logo
