Remi Cornwall wrote:
It won't be ZPE: "Comment on Zero-point Fluctuations and The Cosmological
Constant", Michel F.C., Astrophysical Journal, 466:660-667, (1996).
Does this author say that if someone demonstrates O U energy production,
it, (the energy), won't be comming from the ZPE? Hal Pu
John,
I have heard that the scale utilized was
digital. There should also be a mechanical scale. The stiffness of the
power supply wires may be a concern. There are several possible artefacts that
may or may not have been eliminated. If you wish you can request the
experimental papers but
Q:
Will the operators of the microwave propulsion method shield the device
with a double wall and air space between the wall MAGNETICALLY permeable
shunt?
If not, then how will they know there is not coupling with or to the horizontal and
vertical fields from the earth?
Q: What
In reply to Remi Cornwall's message of Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:55:51
+0100:
Hi,
It is well known that when magnetic field lines are broken, and
reconnect, considerable energy is released. Where does this energy
come from, and why should it not be equally true here on Earth as
it is in the Solar corona
I'm no expert in reverse speech. I did forward the links to the discoverer,
David Oats.
To interpret the reversals, you should have both the forward and reverse
phrases lined up to get the context.
You can get a free trial version of David's software that does that.
I didn't have time to do that.
Remi,
> Now when people start talking about violating the *1st Law* it can only
> mean:
>
> 1) The constants of nature have changed over the timescale of your
> experiment.
> 2) That some new force has been found.
Your faith in the first law is strong.
Is it stronger than your religious faith
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/5324750.stm
May be more ‘discoverers’ should use this ;)
-Original Message-
From: Remi Cornwall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 September 2006 15:46
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:
Colin,
Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence...
There's an art to doing science. One has the knack or not...
Stick with hardball experimental f
We're cosseted in the West. We can entertain all kind of decadent irrational
beliefs and not face the facts: you're better off over here than over there.
See how far you'd get doing FE research or just speaking out in an oil rich
middle-eastern country.
As citizens we should fight to hold that whi
Colin,
Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence...
There's an art to doing science. One has the knack or not...
Stick with hardball experimental fact (peer reviewed facts) not conjecture
if you want to engineer something new. Eg. the stuff I do, independent flux
criterion is old-old EM, EPR/B
10 matches
Mail list logo
