fyi --
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Electrostatic_Generator_by_Walter_Owens_and_Company
A stringed instrument in the symphony of power generation.
Harry
On 16/10/2007 7:37 AM, OrionWorks wrote:
This looks promising and cheap to build.
http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/10/turbine-free-wi.html
Works efficiently (no bearings) in extremely light wind conditions as
well. They
Not unless it's properly earthed. I don't see the ground.
Terry
On 10/16/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hold onto your hats ... We are getting close to Wonderland, Alice
To silence the skeptics, Dr. Stiffler has just now added the Faraday
cage to his circuit
Right, but wetting does not look like a problem.
I was thinking on good rotating parabolic mirrors and MHD applications.
It came to my mind that dynamo effects and effects from Earth's magnetic
field would alter the shape of the mirror.
Galinstan is practically too expensive to buy. It sells in
Terry
It is grounded, but the meaning of 'Properly' is open to interpretation.
If I myself were to question grounding I would have to go back to my early
days in radio. I had an FM site in an old Nike underground bunker. This
bunker had 2x2 brass buss bars running crisscross through. The bars
Todd Hathaway wrote:
fyi --
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Electrostatic_Generator_by_Walter_Owens_and_Company
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Electrostatic_Generator_by_Walter_Owens_and_Company
He's producing AC power through an inverter, from the output of a
Terry Blanton wrote:
Not unless it's properly earthed. I don't see the ground.
Time for a dumb question...
An ungrounded Faraday cage doesn't block a static E-field caused by a
source inside the cage, of course. It can't, because it would need to
be non-neutral to cancel the static
On 10/16/07, EnergyLab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what would you call a proper ground?
A low enough resistance to earth so that the potential remaining on
the surface of the Faraday cage could not possibly be supplying the
circuit.
(Smartass answer)
I would suggest a tie to building steel
Stephen wrote..
I'd bet a box of donuts this is one more example of same.
A nice quote from the peswiki page that kind of says it all:
...he presently does not have a running prototype, as he was working on
the next improvement. The previous unit was burning up batteries...
Howdy
Okay, but herein is the rub, (again my radio days) its not resistance its
reactance. Zero ohms and 107 gets you close to a 1/4 wave in the old CB
band.
When I talk about ground loops I'm speaking of different lengths of a
particular ground circuit that are terminated in different impedances and
The Faraday cage won't block time varying magnetic fields, I suggest a
mumetal shield as well.
Hoyt Stearns
Scottsdale Arizona US
http://HoytStearns.com
-Original Message-
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 10:42 AM
To:
Assuming there is sufficient material available to build all the
necessary components could one not construct multiple arrays (I'm
probably using incorrect terminology here) in order to multiply the
power. The objective would be to increase the amount of power that is
being recorded to the point
See http://green-salon.com/Trend_Tracker.doc - it is real time data, with
absolutely nothing in place to shift gears away from a hyperinflationary
cycle and a catastrophically degraded environment...except a solution to our
dependency on hydrocarbon fuels.
Perhaps it is time for folks to stop
First off - the ground thing is not a factor, as the good Doctor says.
Were talking 50 milliwatts to power the LED to that brightness, right?
Well, the new feature here, even newer than a few days ago, is the
*double* open-ended system, with no transistor Two unconnected
wires, instead
On 10/16/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Surprised Terry has not jumped in on a replication yet... Hey aren't
ramblin' wrecks supposed to enjoy this kind of thing ... and speaking of
one-wire antennas and (makeshift) capacitors, all Terry needs to do is
re-rig his multi-plate Don
This company claims to have some interesting energy production products,
can anyone comment on their efficacy.
http://www.inri.us
--- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! --
http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
Brian Josephson on CF :-)
http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/articles/PF_fire.html
Terry
Thomas wrote..
This company claims to have some interesting energy production products,
can anyone comment on their efficacy.
http://www.inri.us
Howdy Thomas,
Obvious they have little offshore experience. Harsh ocean environments are
killers of anything that moves, rusts or gathers
On Oct 16, 2007, at 2:26 PM, thomas malloy wrote:
This company claims to have some interesting energy production
products, can anyone comment on their efficacy.
http://www.inri.us
This alternative looks good to me:
http://www.oceanpowertechnologies.com/
Other things to consider:
19 matches
Mail list logo
