[VO]: Year 2008 predictions in science
BlankHowdy Vorts, Predictions for the year include a new theory in the fundamental understanding of electricity and it's potential implications. Richard Blank Bkgrd.gif
Re: [VO]: Year 2008 predictions in science
And maybe magnetism by 2012? :-) Terry On Feb 1, 2008 8:22 AM, R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy Vorts, Predictions for the year include a new theory in the fundamental understanding of electricity and it's potential implications. Richard
Re: [Vo]:cold running
On Jan 31, 2008 5:39 PM, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A regular poster to Vo, who will remain unnamed, may want to chime-in with an appropriate anecdote here, about a magnetic motor being developed which shows a much greater dT than what JLN has shown... or not. Odd, I just finished discussing this topic with a colleague less than one hour ago. There is a lot of discussion on the web these days about permanent magnets and work. There is no question that a permanent magnet can perform work; but, there is a great deal of discussion about whether there can be a net energy gain in any magnetic cycle. If indeed there is a net energy gain in any permanent magnetic cycle from whence does this energy come? Soon, I hope to be placed in contact with Horst Stormer (1998 Nobel physics - fractional quantum hall effect) to discuss the defense of a European patent application for such a magnetic cycle. I actually used Hotson's first treatise as a talking point for the electron being capable of acting as a negative entropy pump. I am hoping that Dr. Stormer can provide some insight as to the physical structure of the electron (or all fermions for that matter). It is conjectured at this time that a net energy gain in a magnetic cycle may come from the angular momentum of half-integer spin particles. A seriously outlandish idea is that a negative energy photon is moved from beyond the zero energy point into our 3 space. However, it would explain some experimental evidence of which I am not presently at liberty to discuss. Terry
Re: [Vo]:cold running
On 1/2/2008 11:30 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: On Jan 31, 2008 5:39 PM, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A regular poster to Vo, who will remain unnamed, may want to chime-in with an appropriate anecdote here, about a magnetic motor being developed which shows a much greater dT than what JLN has shown... or not. Odd, I just finished discussing this topic with a colleague less than one hour ago. There is a lot of discussion on the web these days about permanent magnets and work. There is no question that a permanent magnet can perform work; but, there is a great deal of discussion about whether there can be a net energy gain in any magnetic cycle. If indeed there is a net energy gain in any permanent magnetic cycle from whence does this energy come? Does it really matter? I mean shouldn't we be more concerned with the _effects_ of energy production and distribution rather than trying to balance the energy books all the time. Harry Soon, I hope to be placed in contact with Horst Stormer (1998 Nobel physics - fractional quantum hall effect) to discuss the defense of a European patent application for such a magnetic cycle. I actually used Hotson's first treatise as a talking point for the electron being capable of acting as a negative entropy pump. I am hoping that Dr. Stormer can provide some insight as to the physical structure of the electron (or all fermions for that matter). It is conjectured at this time that a net energy gain in a magnetic cycle may come from the angular momentum of half-integer spin particles. A seriously outlandish idea is that a negative energy photon is moved from beyond the zero energy point into our 3 space. However, it would explain some experimental evidence of which I am not presently at liberty to discuss. Terry
Re: [VO]: Year 2008 predictions in science
Howdy Terry, The ever increasing understanding of both electricity and magnetism may allow us to merge what was in the past, considered different. Nature is full of clues, take the color spectrum for example. The early indians of the western hemisphere considered the color blue and green to both be the same color.. The same may be so in sound. Consider that sound research demonstrate sound may be entirely cancelled by.. what else? .. Sound.That may not seem important to the casual viewer, however it is most profound to consider. When studying there type relationships we may consider that sound. like electricity may be released by cancellation whereas the power released is greater than the cancelling power. Within this comment lurks another thought lurks regarding the identifying marker we describe as LENR. Beyond the close kin between electricity amd magnetism, we may find much of what we perceive as different not so, but extremely close kin.. some elements may be transmuting before our eyes. At present we view many chemical reactions as reactions when we may began to view them as tranmutation phenomena. Frank Grimer has an inkling of a thought that will be expanded as time goes by regarding chemistry and transmutation. Now if I could just get the Dime Box ancient alchemy home brew kits we sell to turn water into wine,.. well .. err.. maybe not go that far.. Richard And maybe magnetism by 2012? :-) Terry On Feb 1, 2008 8:22 AM, R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy Vorts, Predictions for the year include a new theory in the fundamental understanding of electricity and it's potential implications. Richard -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.18/1255 - Release Date: 2/1/2008 9:59 AM
Re: [VO]: Year 2008 predictions in science
Turn the water into beer, or better still, tequila. I'm sure both will sell better at the Dime Box than wine. Speaking of Grimer. His response to a recent post of mine on the B-Atm group: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Frank Grimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:20:40 - Subject: [Beta-atmosphere_group] Re: Electric Field Contains B-Atm Interesting. In effect the negative electrons in the metal are the equivalent of the pore water in clay and it is the electrical pressure difference between the inside and the outside of the metal which gives the metal its strength. Putting a positive charge outside increases the pressure difference and so squeezes the metal more closely together sealing up the cracks. The corollary is that if you put a negative charge outside you would open up the cracks and cause the metal to break up. I wonder if this is related to the Hutchison effect in some way or other. --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Science/2008/01/30/new_way_found_to_stop_metal_stress_cracks/8493/ New way found to stop metal stress cracks Published: Jan. 30, 2008 at 1:19 PM AMHERST, Mass., Jan. 30 (UPI) -- U.S. engineers have discovered a strong electrical field can stabilize the surface of metals, inhibiting the formation of stress fractures. The University of Massachusetts researchers said the technology, which can also be applied to other conductive solids, could improve the function and reliability of a wide variety of machines, including aircraft and electronic devices. In metals and other crystalline solids that conduct electricity, stress is generally concentrated on the surface of the material, the scientists said, noting stress also builds up at interfaces where two types of material are joined. The study showed the action of an electric field, properly applied while a material is under stress, can stabilize the surface or interface, inhibiting the formation of cracks and healing cracks that have already started. Traditionally, improving crack resistance has relied on improving the physical properties of the surface through polishing and coating, or strengthening the interfaces, said Professor Dimitrios Maroudas, who led the research. Our study proposes a drastically different approach to improving crack resistance and increasing the lifetime of components and devices. Results of the study, which included doctoral student Vivek Tomar and Associate Research Professor M. Rauf Gungor, appear in the journal Physical Review Letters. end On Feb 1, 2008 3:20 PM, R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy Terry, The ever increasing understanding of both electricity and magnetism may allow us to merge what was in the past, considered different. Nature is full of clues, take the color spectrum for example. The early indians of the western hemisphere considered the color blue and green to both be the same color.. The same may be so in sound. Consider that sound research demonstrate sound may be entirely cancelled by.. what else? .. Sound.That may not seem important to the casual viewer, however it is most profound to consider. When studying there type relationships we may consider that sound. like electricity may be released by cancellation whereas the power released is greater than the cancelling power. Within this comment lurks another thought lurks regarding the identifying marker we describe as LENR. Beyond the close kin between electricity amd magnetism, we may find much of what we perceive as different not so, but extremely close kin.. some elements may be transmuting before our eyes. At present we view many chemical reactions as reactions when we may began to view them as tranmutation phenomena. Frank Grimer has an inkling of a thought that will be expanded as time goes by regarding chemistry and transmutation. Now if I could just get the Dime Box ancient alchemy home brew kits we sell to turn water into wine,.. well .. err.. maybe not go that far.. Richard And maybe magnetism by 2012? :-) Terry On Feb 1, 2008 8:22 AM, R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy Vorts, Predictions for the year include a new theory in the fundamental understanding of electricity and it's potential implications. Richard -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.18/1255 - Release Date: 2/1/2008 9:59 AM
Re: [Vo]:cold running
No, Harry it really does not. No more than it matters why cold fusion works. I was merely responding to a comment on this thread with my own hair-brained ideas. Regardless of *how* it works, the principles have now decided that they must throw down the gauntlet. Scrutiny is being brought to bear from various reputable sources. I just hope we fare better than Brian Josephson with *our* heretical claims. All test equipment has been calibrated, traceable to NIST. Alternative verifications are prepared. And here come da judge(s). A 60 day clock is ticking. Watch this space. The evidence can not be sequestered. Watch this space for any advance notices. :-) Terry On Feb 1, 2008 3:03 PM, Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/2/2008 11:30 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: On Jan 31, 2008 5:39 PM, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A regular poster to Vo, who will remain unnamed, may want to chime-in with an appropriate anecdote here, about a magnetic motor being developed which shows a much greater dT than what JLN has shown... or not. Odd, I just finished discussing this topic with a colleague less than one hour ago. There is a lot of discussion on the web these days about permanent magnets and work. There is no question that a permanent magnet can perform work; but, there is a great deal of discussion about whether there can be a net energy gain in any magnetic cycle. If indeed there is a net energy gain in any permanent magnetic cycle from whence does this energy come? Does it really matter? I mean shouldn't we be more concerned with the _effects_ of energy production and distribution rather than trying to balance the energy books all the time. Harry Soon, I hope to be placed in contact with Horst Stormer (1998 Nobel physics - fractional quantum hall effect) to discuss the defense of a European patent application for such a magnetic cycle. I actually used Hotson's first treatise as a talking point for the electron being capable of acting as a negative entropy pump. I am hoping that Dr. Stormer can provide some insight as to the physical structure of the electron (or all fermions for that matter). It is conjectured at this time that a net energy gain in a magnetic cycle may come from the angular momentum of half-integer spin particles. A seriously outlandish idea is that a negative energy photon is moved from beyond the zero energy point into our 3 space. However, it would explain some experimental evidence of which I am not presently at liberty to discuss. Terry
[Vo]:some experiments completed
EXPERIMENTS COMPLETED THROUGH JAN 31, 08 I got called back to work in Charlotte next week. What happened to my promised break? I will have no more time to conduct experiments. I completed the following in January. Added Powdered Nickel to heavy water. Stimulated the suspension with a laser pencil. No anomalous thermal energy was detected. Added nano colloid gold to heavy water. Stimulated the suspension with a laser pencil. No anomalous thermal energy was detected. Loaded a nickel wire with heavy water through electrolysis. This wire was connected in a series loop with a radio frequency turning capacitor. I salvaged this capacitor form an old multiband radio quite a few years ago. The capacitor is a fine piece of craftsmanship.One side of the loop was grounded and connected to the cathode of an electrolysis power supply The anode was connected to the + connection of the power supply. I stimulated the tuned circuit with sparks from an automotive spark coil. I did this at a rate of 200 sparks per second with a square wave coil driving circuit. I observed the waveform on an oscilloscope. The circuit rang in a range for 5 to 50 megacycles depending on the tuning capacitor was adjusted and jumped You have to make sure the ground and the circuit is tight or you may damage the scope with sparks of high voltage. No anomalous RF energy was detected. EXPERIMENT NOT COMPLETED The last experiment with a palladium wire. I did not have the wire. The experiment requires an 6 inch length of very thin wire. Its easy to theorize about cold fusion. It is even easier to reject it. It is difficult to produce a positive experimental verification. I wish Ed would repeat the last experiment with a palladium wire. Ed if you want to do this I can send you my hand built coil sparking device. You can also drive a spark coil through a two stage transistor amplifier. The input to the transistors is a square wave signal generator. You have to boost the signal generators output current by a factor of 100 to drive the coil. Frank Z **Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300025 48)
Re: [Vo]:some experiments completed
Thanks for the offer, Frank. However, I have my hands full exploring the radiation produced by gas discharge. The beauty of this method is that the radiation gives a window into the process and mechanism. Once this understanding is achieved, it will be easy to predict what will work and what won't, without guessing. Regards,Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EXPERIMENTS COMPLETED THROUGH JAN 31, 08 I got called back to work in Charlotte next week. What happened to my promised break? I will have no more time to conduct experiments. I completed the following in January. Added Powdered Nickel to heavy water. Stimulated the suspension with a laser pencil. No anomalous thermal energy was detected. Added nano colloid gold to heavy water. Stimulated the suspension with a laser pencil. No anomalous thermal energy was detected. Loaded a nickel wire with heavy water through electrolysis. This wire was connected in a series loop with a radio frequency turning capacitor. I salvaged this capacitor form an old multiband radio quite a few years ago. The capacitor is a fine piece of craftsmanship. One side of the loop was grounded and connected to the cathode of an electrolysis power supply The anode was connected to the + connection of the power supply. I stimulated the tuned circuit with sparks from an automotive spark coil. I did this at a rate of 200 sparks per second with a square wave coil driving circuit. I observed the waveform on an oscilloscope. The circuit rang in a range for 5 to 50 megacycles depending on the tuning capacitor was adjusted and jumped You have to make sure the ground and the circuit is tight or you may damage the scope with sparks of high voltage. No anomalous RF energy was detected. EXPERIMENT NOT COMPLETED The last experiment with a palladium wire. I did not have the wire. The experiment requires an 6 inch length of very thin wire. Its easy to theorize about cold fusion. It is even easier to reject it. It is difficult to produce a positive experimental verification. I wish Ed would repeat the last experiment with a palladium wire. Ed if you want to do this I can send you my hand built coil sparking device. You can also drive a spark coil through a two stage transistor amplifier. The input to the transistors is a square wave signal generator. You have to boost the signal generators output current by a factor of 100 to drive the coil. Frank Z Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp0030002548
Re: [Vo]:Richard Boyland UFO newsletter
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 10:26, OrionWorks wrote: Thomas sez: I didn't notice the date, wouldn't it be great if The Others did show up, in mass, on election day? OTOH, they have shown up, Phoenix being a classic case in point, and the main stream press just ignored it. Given the source of this story, I'm sure that the author is serious. This dovetails with reports that I heard on C to C AM about the sightings of huge craft. Then the military showed up and claimed they were experimental craft and that they were dropping flares. Like they would operate experimental aircraft or drop flares over a city! When it comes to UFO abduction opinions such as those recently expressed by Dr. Boyland, it is probably wise to seek a second opinion. Just to clarify an important but often (IMO) intentionally misdirected matter, the military most certainly did NOT drop flairs over the city of Phoenix. They dropped their flairs beyond a mountain range. This was irrefutably established when a video specialist superimposed a video of the flairs taken the evening of the UFO flap with day time imagery taken at the same location. In the day time video the distant mountain range was clearly visible. When both videos were superimposed on top of each other one can clearly determine how the flairs systematically disappeared - as they slowly floated down and dropped below the distant mountain range. Regarding (intentional and/or unintentional) obfuscation and misdirection of the UFO facts, whenever the Phoenix UFO incident is continuously brought up in the media the famous video clip of the distant military flair drop tends to be the only imagery shown to the public, imagery that was clearly established, scientifically, to have been the result of military maneuvers. IMO, it's not due to some nefarious attempt to show this video to intentionally inject additional disinformation misdirection of the facts. It's due to the fact that the population in general remains incredibly ignorant of the actual facts, ESPECIALLY the news media. The news media out of laziness just shows stock footage, whatever they can scrounge up from their library of UFO footage. Meanwhile, hundreds of Phoenix residences clearly witnessed something extraordinary, something exotic flying quietly through the evening skies that evening, something that was far less prosaic than the run-of-the-mill dropped military flairs activity. This was recently confirmed on the Larry King Live show by the then AZ Governer, Symington, who at the time of the incident tried his best to downplay the situation in order to prevent what he personally feared might turn into a panic among some of his constituents. . Move along... Move along... nothing to see here. I gather the object was very large, black for the most part, triangular shaped, and opaque in the sense that it blocked out starlight as it flew over the gazing eyes of astonished witnesses, including the eyes of Governor Symington. It would appear that no one got a decent photograph of the object. This is understandable since the object was opaque, and it was in the evening. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks Remember that incident. It was described in the press that would print the story as a 'boomerang shaped ship of immense size, probably a half a mile long. Inasmuch as it obscured stars and was witnessed by thousands, convoluted reasoning calling it a so called 'projection' strains credibility. We don't have the equipment to 'project' something like that. That kind of 'projection' would be like a 'Star Trek' 'hologram' inasmuch as it imitated a solid object, the ship! A disinformation campaign that stupid that was allowed to pass without serious public challenge smacks of government coverup with media participation. Most folks would know a dropping flare from a light that showed slow steady controlled movement across the sky. As for large accelerations, a space compression and expansion technology could have effectively translated that ship without it having to accelerate within its reference frame, circumventing Einstein.ooops did I say some kind of 'heresy' to the worshipers of that fella. Incidentally that kind of movement would also circumvent inertia. Neat way to travel. Now we should work on THAT instead of trying to lie to people. But then again maybe we ARE working on just that. The public seems to be its own worst enemy in these cases. Most read the stories, then turned to the tawdry capers of the likes of Paris Hilton or somebody like her, as she had not made her mark on the world yet when that incident happened. Like any other story it had its fifteen minutes of fame and then sunk out of sight and out of mind. Most of these visitations sound like we are on somebody's tour group itinerary. Here lets see the aboriginals in their natural state. Most involve
[Vo]:OT: NASA to beam Beatles tune into space
Speaking of aliens... Harry NASA to beam Beatles tune into space 'Send my love to the aliens,' says McCartney Last Updated: Friday, February 1, 2008 | 11:12 AM ET CBC News U.S. space agency NASA plans to send a Beatles hit across the universe on Monday, saying it is the first song ever to be beamed directly into deep space. The song chosen is, appropriately, Across the Universe, and it will be sent out 40 years to the day after it was recorded. The track will be transmitted through the Deep Space Network, an international array of antennas that supports space exploration missions, at 7 p.m. ET on Feb. 4. The network will direct the song toward Polaris, the North Star, 431 light years away. The event marks the 50th anniversary of NASA and the 45th anniversary of the Deep Space Network. Former Beatle Paul McCartney sent a message of congratulations to the space agency, adding Send my love to the aliens. All the best, Paul. John Lennon's widow Yoko Ono also hailed the achievement. I see that this is the beginning of the new age in which we will communicate with billions of planets across the universe, she said. It's not the first time NASA has beamed up a Beatles tune. In 2005 McCartney performed the song Good Day Sunshine during a concert that was transmitted to the International Space Station. Here Comes the Sun, Ticket to Ride and A Hard Day's Night have also been played to wake astronaut crews in orbit. The public around the world has been invited to participate in the event by simultaneously playing the song at the same time it is transmitted by NASA.
