Re: [Vo]:Self Runner

2008-06-05 Thread Nick Palmer
Suppose, just suppose that you had a generator that self powered and lit a couple of 200 W light bulbs at the same time. What would you do tomorrow? I'm not sure what I would do if I had one but as it's you, I would kidnap you ASAP and ask for nothing to let you go but a piece of paper saying

Re: [Vo]:Self Runner

2008-06-05 Thread Terry Blanton
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With an IPO that raised say $10 billion (which alone would drag things out an additional 6 months) you could count on the first product capable of powering a home coming to market in 4 years- at the very least. Has there

[Vo]:Littlefoot on Mars

2008-06-05 Thread Terry Blanton
A footprint on an alien landscape: http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,23796269-5001021,00.html?from=public_rss

[Vo]:STEORN still alive, at least in the legal sense

2008-06-05 Thread OrionWorks
Sort of amusing: http://dispatchesfromthefuture.com/2008/04/steorn_still_alive.html http://tinyurl.com/4wk4qe Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks

Re: [Vo]:The Science of Intention

2008-06-05 Thread thomas malloy
Edmund Storms wrote: . Regardless of the difficulty in accepting the claims and observations, when thousands of people keep experiencing the same reproducible events, something real must be happening. I don't want this to be a discussion of Sai Baba. Nevertheless, his existence raises some

Re: [Vo]:Self Runner

2008-06-05 Thread Jed Rothwell
leaking pen wrote: Patent schmatent. Creative commons license. My thoughts exactly. This thing is much too big to patent. You wouldn't make any money patenting it. Every industrial corporation on earth would simply steal from you. Give it to the world and then, after you become famous,

Re: [Vo]:The Science of Intention

2008-06-05 Thread Edmund Storms
thomas malloy wrote: Edmund Storms wrote: . Regardless of the difficulty in accepting the claims and observations, when thousands of people keep experiencing the same reproducible events, something real must be happening. I don't want this to be a discussion of Sai Baba. Nevertheless, his

Re: [Vo]:Self Runner

2008-06-05 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
Jed Rothwell wrote: Terry Blanton wrote: Okay, so, say you have a machine which puts out 500 Watts with 50 Watts input and the model cost $5,000. Would anyone buy one? I would, in a heartbeat. Especially if you can arrange to eliminate the 50 W input after she revs up, and self-sustain.

RE: [Vo]:Self Runner

2008-06-05 Thread Jeff Fink
The first practical LENR device will not be the best or the only method. There will be a thousand patentable variations. Any successful design will have teams of competing engineers feverishly designing around the patents, and in the process, they will quite often develop a vastly superior

Re: [Vo]:Self Runner

2008-06-05 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
Terry Blanton wrote: On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With an IPO that raised say $10 billion (which alone would drag things out an additional 6 months) you could count on the first product capable of powering a home coming to market in 4 years- at the

Re: [Vo]:Self Runner

2008-06-05 Thread Mike Carrell
A machine with the properties proposed has existed for decades, creating great puzzles and legends all its own. Use Google and look up Testatika. At a forum at Temple University some years ago, I talked to a lecturer who had actually seen the device and watched it operate. reportedly it

Re: [Vo]:The Science of Intention

2008-06-05 Thread OrionWorks
Thanks for bringing Sai Baba back to my attention, Ed. How foolish of me to have temporarily forgotten him. Isn't it interesting that someone with his unique perception on reality, combined with his ability to manipulate reality (seemingly the fundamental laws of physics) as Sai does remains, for

Re: [Vo]:The Science of Intention

2008-06-05 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
OrionWorks wrote: Thanks for bringing Sai Baba back to my attention, Ed. How foolish of me to have temporarily forgotten him. Isn't it interesting that someone with his unique perception on reality, combined with his ability to manipulate reality (seemingly the fundamental laws of physics) as

Re: [Vo]:The Science of Intention

2008-06-05 Thread OrionWorks
Hi Stephen, I'm sorry, but I have to ask this... If he can work miracles, and if he's here to fix up the mess in any way shape or form, what's he actually doing to fix things up? No apologies are necessary. ;-) IMO: I suspect the phrase fix up the mess is being taken out of context. Please

Re: [Vo]:Self Runner

2008-06-05 Thread Terry Blanton
The Testatika's technology is guarded by a European sect as I recall. This is the device which taps static electricity? Terry On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Mike Carrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A machine with the properties proposed has existed for decades, creating great puzzles and

[Vo]:More on Chlorine photo-reactivity

2008-06-05 Thread Jones Beene
This video could be a hoax. Or it could be a more complex situation than meets the eye, so to speak... The only reason it is posted here, given its probably high level of bogosity -- is the wrt the Scragg patents. Not to mention Kanzius patent and Mills recent inclusion of chlorine as a

[Vo]:150 million

2008-06-05 Thread Harry Veeder
Perhaps CF researcherscould ask Mike Lazaridis for funding. Harry http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/06/05/lazaridis-perimeter.html RIM co-founder donates $50M to Waterloo physics centre Research in Motion co-founder Mike Lazaridis has donated an additional $50 million to the Waterloo,

Re: [Vo]:The Science of Intention

2008-06-05 Thread Harry Veeder
alternatively... God created us to fix his mistakes. [Sometimeschildren do end up fixing their parents mistakes] ;-) Harry - Original Message - From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, June 5, 2008 5:18 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Science of Intention Hi Stephen,I'm sorry,

Re: [Vo]:The Science of Intention

2008-06-05 Thread PHILIP WINESTONE
Ed, I wonder if you've ever heard of a man they called the Backwoods Buddha... Look him up on the 'Net if you're interested... P. - Original Message From: Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2008 7:30:26 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Science of

Re: [Vo]:The Science of Intention

2008-06-05 Thread OrionWorks
Harry sez: alternatively... God created us to fix his mistakes. [Sometimes children do end up fixing their parents mistakes] ;-) Harry LOL! Metaphorically speaking: Even G_d is surprised at what is occasionally manifested. Whoa! You did what Regards Steven Vincent Johnson

Re: [Vo]:The Science of Intention

2008-06-05 Thread Edmund Storms
Thanks for pointing this out, Philip. I have not read of Richard Rose, but I know of many other people who have acquired extraordinary insight. In addition, some people have also been able to master some of the abilities Sai Baba exhibits. As with all things, these talents occur throughout the

Re: [Vo]:The Science of Intention

2008-06-05 Thread PHILIP WINESTONE
Ed, Yes - I know something of Sai Baba, the latest in a lineage of Sai Babas. I also know a disciple who spent 25 years at his ashrama. But Sai Baba is also part of the dream... I'm not fixated on Richard Rose, nor anyone for that matter; been there, done all that. This thread runs a long