[Vo]:Under our feet

2009-03-23 Thread mixent
Hi,

Most of the Earth is composed of Silicon dioxide combined with other metal
oxides, frequently in the form of silicates.

Consider the nuclear reaction:-

Si28 + 2 O16 - 4 H + Fe56 +0.478 MeV

If this occasionally became possible near the core, then it would slowly convert
abundant SiO2 into Iron, causing the core to grow at the expense of the rest,
while releasing both heat and Hydrogen, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin
.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html



[Vo]:Off topic biological problem

2009-03-23 Thread fznidarsic

My water tank broke about 3 months ago.  A new one was put in.  After that I 
noticed what appeared to be bite marks on my legs.  Some nights I got 20 or 
more bites. I thought that bugs came into the apartment while the tank was 
being installed.  Maybe they left the door open. Maybe bed bugs from the next 
apartment.  Yes, thay can live in an upscale neighborhood.  Maybe there were 
bugs in my car or office.  I cleaned vacuumed, put out sticky traps, slept on a 
sticky tape enclosed rubber batter, spread diatomaceous earth around, washed my 
clothes in bleach and ruined them, put dubble sided sticky tape in a square on 
the cealing above my bed, and had the exterminator come in.  He sprayed the 
apartment with Stera Fab.  The problem persisted.  I searched and found  no 
bugs except for a few ear wigs.  I even got up at night with a bright 
flashlight and looked for them.  I was tormented. Upon the advice of Ron 
Anderson, I had the temperature turned up on my hot water tank.  The results 
were immediate.  The bite marks went away.  Apparently in the combination hot 
water / heating tanks bacteria can grow if the temperature is set to low.  Iron 
from the failure of the last tank my have contributed to the problem.  Maybe 
there is something going on in Lake Norman.  I am now happy again.  The water 
is a bit hot but I’ll leave it go for now.  I hope the new tank does not 
overheat and I will g
o through the same thing again.   If I could open the utility door I could 
adjust the thing myself.  What next?  Dont turn down your tank too much.

Frank Znidarsic



[Vo]:ref QED

2009-03-23 Thread fznidarsic

The reason that the electron does not spiral into the nucleus has been a 
fundamental mystery. It is currently accepted that the angular momentum cannot 
be lees that h/2pie.? This has been accepted because the result agrees with 
experimental spectra.? Puthoff came up with some ideas about the emission and 
absorption of zero point energy.? I believe that I have solved this problem.? 
The orbits of the atoms exist as point of electromagnetic and gravitomagnetic 
accessibility.? The ground state orbit is a point where the transitional 
frequency ( 1.094 megahertz-meters ) equals the natural frequency of the 
electron.

?

?

?

I have a paper coming out on this in Infinite Energy in Sept of 09.? I hope the 
paper proves to be epic.

?

Frank Znidarsic


[Vo]:Several anniversary news items

2009-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Today is the 20th anniversary of the 1989 announcement of cold 
fusion. There are several news items about it, most of them negative 
I am sorry to say. Here is an example:


http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2009/03/dayintech_0323

- Jed



[Vo]:Red Letter Day

2009-03-23 Thread Jones Beene

History in the re-making today - March 23, 2009, when the ACS (American 
Chemical Society) conference takes place in the birthplace of cold fusion, Salt 
Lake City UT on the 20th anniversary of its ill-fated announcement.

In an alternative universe, somewhere in a more progressive galaxy, where 
society rose up to meet the challenge of finding scientific truth in the face 
of entrenched negativity from the mainstream, millions of homes are being 
heated cheaply with a perfected version of the LENR water-heater (at least 
in my new SciFi novel).

Unfortunately, here on a wayward planet formerly ruled and nearly bankrupted by 
a Confederacy of hawkish Dunces - we cannot quip you've come a long way, baby 
... more like you've come the wrong way, baby 



[Vo]:Kalte Fusion und die Zukunft

2009-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell

Article in German (obviously) by Haiko Lietz:

http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/29/29969/1.html

You can translate it with remarkable accuracy here:

http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.heise.de%2Ftp%2Fr4%2Fartikel%2F29%2F29969%2F1.htmlsl=detl=enhl=enie=UTF-8

- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Off topic biological problem

2009-03-23 Thread leaking pen
You can adjust it yourself, and there are hot water bacteria that will
also grow, which is why its wiser to heat cold tap water than to use
hot water from teh taop for drinking and such.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:19 AM,  fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
 My water tank broke about 3 months ago.  A new one was put in.  After that I
 noticed what appeared to be bite marks on my legs.  Some nights I got 20 or
 more bites. I thought that bugs came into the apartment while the tank was
 being installed.  Maybe they left the door open. Maybe bed bugs from the
 next apartment.  Yes, thay can live in an upscale neighborhood.  Maybe there
 were bugs in my car or office.  I cleaned vacuumed, put out sticky traps,
 slept on a sticky tape enclosed rubber batter, spread diatomaceous earth
 around, washed my clothes in bleach and ruined them, put dubble sided sticky
 tape in a square on the cealing above my bed, and had the exterminator come
 in.  He sprayed the apartment with Stera Fab.  The problem persisted.  I
 searched and found  no bugs except for a few ear wigs.  I even got up at
 night with a bright flashlight and looked for them.  I was tormented. Upon
 the advice of Ron Anderson, I had the temperature turned up on my hot water
 tank.  The results were immediate.  The bite marks went away.  Apparently in
 the combination hot water / heating tanks bacteria can grow if the
 temperature is set to low.  Iron from the failure of the last tank my have
 contributed to the problem.  Maybe there is something going on in Lake
 Norman.  I am now happy again.  The water is a bit hot but I’ll leave it go
 for now.  I hope the new tank does not overheat and I will go through the
 same thing again.   If I could open the utility door I could adjust the
 thing myself.  What next?  Dont turn down your tank too much.

 Frank Znidarsic

 
 The Average US Credit Score is 692. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps!



[Vo]:Cheap cars (from Tata)

2009-03-23 Thread OrionWorks
The World's Cheapest Car Debuts in India

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1887070,00.html?cnn=yes
http://tinyurl.com/ccjjx8

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



[Vo]:The ghost of free energy

2009-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell

The ghost of free energy

by Jon Cartwright

See:

http://www.groundreport.com/Health_and_Science/The-ghost-of-free-energy

- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Red Letter Day

2009-03-23 Thread Terry Blanton
Your novel, or one you are reading?

I am reading Variable Star published posthumously by Heinlein and
they have a ZPE drive!

Terry

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:

 History in the re-making today - March 23, 2009, when the ACS (American 
 Chemical Society) conference takes place in the birthplace of cold fusion, 
 Salt Lake City UT on the 20th anniversary of its ill-fated announcement.

 In an alternative universe, somewhere in a more progressive galaxy, where 
 society rose up to meet the challenge of finding scientific truth in the face 
 of entrenched negativity from the mainstream, millions of homes are being 
 heated cheaply with a perfected version of the LENR water-heater (at 
 least in my new SciFi novel).

 Unfortunately, here on a wayward planet formerly ruled and nearly bankrupted 
 by a Confederacy of hawkish Dunces - we cannot quip you've come a long way, 
 baby ... more like you've come the wrong way, baby 





Re: [Vo]:Off topic biological problem

2009-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell

Frank Znidarsic wrote:


Iron from the failure of the last tank my have contributed to the problem.


Before they put the new tank in they should have flushed out the 
pipes. I got gobs of crud out of the pipes when they did that. Also, 
once or twice a year you should turn off the heater, attach a hose to 
the faucet at the bottom of the tank, and dump out one or two 
tank-fulls of water. This should wash out some of the sand and mud 
that settles at the bottom of the tank. It should improve heating 
performance and make the hot water more hygienic.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Off topic biological problem

2009-03-23 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence


leaking pen wrote:
 You can adjust it yourself, and there are hot water bacteria that will
 also grow, 

And they make quite a stink when they really get going.

Hot water smells like a fart ('scuse me, I can't think of a 'polite'
word for it), cold water smells fine...  totally weird, never heard of
it until our hot water heater got infected.  I was convinced we had
some strange problem with the drains until we had a guy from the gas
company come in to look at the hot water heater.  And he looked at it,
sadly, and explained about superchlorination and how it's what to do to
get rid of the bugs, but then he added that they'll probably just come
back anyway...

If you're on town water, with chlorine in the water, I'd guess that you
most likely will never encounter this.


 which is why its wiser to heat cold tap water than to use
 hot water from teh taop for drinking and such.
 
 On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:19 AM,  fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
 My water tank broke about 3 months ago.  A new one was put in.  After that I
 noticed what appeared to be bite marks on my legs.  Some nights I got 20 or
 more bites. I thought that bugs came into the apartment while the tank was
 being installed.  Maybe they left the door open. Maybe bed bugs from the
 next apartment.  Yes, thay can live in an upscale neighborhood.  Maybe there
 were bugs in my car or office.  I cleaned vacuumed, put out sticky traps,
 slept on a sticky tape enclosed rubber batter, spread diatomaceous earth
 around, washed my clothes in bleach and ruined them, put dubble sided sticky
 tape in a square on the cealing above my bed, and had the exterminator come
 in.  He sprayed the apartment with Stera Fab.  The problem persisted.  I
 searched and found  no bugs except for a few ear wigs.  I even got up at
 night with a bright flashlight and looked for them.  I was tormented. Upon
 the advice of Ron Anderson, I had the temperature turned up on my hot water
 tank.  The results were immediate.  The bite marks went away.  Apparently in
 the combination hot water / heating tanks bacteria can grow if the
 temperature is set to low.  Iron from the failure of the last tank my have
 contributed to the problem.  Maybe there is something going on in Lake
 Norman.  I am now happy again.  The water is a bit hot but I’ll leave it go
 for now.  I hope the new tank does not overheat and I will go through the
 same thing again.   If I could open the utility door I could adjust the
 thing myself.  What next?  Dont turn down your tank too much.

 Frank Znidarsic

 
 The Average US Credit Score is 692. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps!
 
 



[Vo]:ACS press release

2009-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell

See:

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-03/acs-fr031709.php



Re: [Vo]:Several anniversary news items

2009-03-23 Thread Esa Ruoho
hahah, i am very amused. today, without me or the label having any
knowledge of the cold fusion announcement from 1989, a new mp3 ep came
out called Cold Trail EP.. fun synchronicities:)

yours, esa


On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
 Today is the 20th anniversary of the 1989 announcement of cold fusion. There
 are several news items about it, most of them negative I am sorry to say.
 Here is an example:

 http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2009/03/dayintech_0323

 - Jed





-- 
--
a hundred million dollar gamble into alternative energy research in
the form of stipends and donations from the worldwide population
could completely alter the face of the planet.



[Vo]:Mizuno reports from ACS

2009-03-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
I am in Atlanta. Mizuno called me from the ACS conference in Salt 
Lake City to say hello. He is going to present this afternoon.


He says there are many people attending the sessions, including young 
people. He says Kitamura et al. independently replicated Arata, and 
will report on his findings today. They used better calorimetry than 
Arata did. The abstract is here:


http://oasys2.confex.com/acs/237nm/techprogram/P1218224.HTM

Copy of abstract (which Steve  I already uploaded):


Deuterium gas charging experiments with Pd powders for excess heat evolution

Akira Kitamura,, Takayoshi Nohmi, Yu Sasaki, Tatsuya Yamaguchi, Akira 
Taniike, Akito Takahashi, Reiko Seto, and Yushi Fujita.


Graduate School of Maritime Sciences, Kobe University, 5-1-1 
Fukaeminamimachi, Higashinadaku, Kobe, 658-0022, Japan


Technova Inc, 1-1-1 Uchisaiwaicho, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, 100-0011, Japan

We have started a series of deuterium (and hydrogen) gas charging 
experiments with Pd nano-powders to study possible heat evolution and 
D (or H)-loading characteristics by using a revised Arata-type twin 
system. The twin system is made of identically designed A1 and A2 
systems, in each of which an inner gas-charging cell with flow 
calorimeter and an outer vacuum chamber are set up. The A1 system is 
used for D-gas foreground run, and the A2 system is for the H-gas 
blank run. Our first data with two commercially available Pd powders 
(0.1 micron Pd particles and Pd-black) are already meaningful. 
Experiments with Pd-black sample gave 2.6 kJ/g-Pd excess heat for the 
second phase of 1,300 minutes operation and D/Pd=0.85 for the first 
phase (about 100 min interval from start) with zero D-gas pressure. 
No excess heat with H-gas charging was seen with H/Pd=0.78. 
Experiments with 0.1 micron Pd powders gave D/Pd =0.45 for the first 
phase and much less excess heat for the second phase. We are 
extending experiments for nano-fabricated Pd samples to be reported 
at the meeting. In situ radiation monitors are for neutron and 
gamma-ray. Elemental analysis of before/after samples is done by 
PIXE. He detection will be also tried.



Here is a recent paper from this group about an Iwamura replication:

http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/YamaguchiTinvestigat.pdf

- Jed


[Vo]:Science News: 'Cold Fusion' Rebirth? New Evidence For Existence Of Controversial Energy Source

2009-03-23 Thread Ron Wormus

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090323110450.htm



Re: [Vo]:ref QED

2009-03-23 Thread mixent
In reply to  fznidar...@aol.com's message of Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:43:37 -0400:
Hi Frank,
[snip]

The reason that the electron does not spiral into the nucleus has been a 
fundamental mystery. It is currently accepted that the angular momentum cannot 
be lees that h/2pie.? This has been accepted because the result agrees with 
experimental spectra.? Puthoff came up with some ideas about the emission and 
absorption of zero point energy.? I believe that I have solved this problem.? 
The orbits of the atoms exist as point of electromagnetic and gravitomagnetic 
accessibility.? The ground state orbit is a point where the transitional 
frequency ( 1.094 megahertz-meters ) equals the natural frequency of the 
electron.
[snip]
I think the electron doesn't spiral into the nucleus because it doesn't have
enough angular momentum to create a photon, hence it can't radiate, which means
it can't lose energy.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html



[Vo]:Fear and Loathing in Las Vortex

2009-03-23 Thread Kyle Mcallister

. . . . 

Alright, I don't really know how to start this, so I
won't. I'll just start hacking away into it. What's
the deal?

Now maybe I'm reading this wrong, but there's a bias
it seems against any results, theoretical or
experimental, that have a superluminal result. What's
so %^$%# bad about FTL? My tax dollars can pay for
scientists (so-called) who are not worth the gunpowder
it would take to blow them to hell, to come up with a
bunch of unprovable theoretical/religious garbage, and
everyone loves this. I assume this is because it takes
some motivation for these people to get off their
asses to do an experiment. So fine. BTW, the scientist
I am thinking of is Lawrence Krauss. A dumbass, who
believes that conjecturing that looking through a
telescope will alter the universe is a good bit o'
science. While, of course, killing the Breakthrough
Propulsion Physics program (there's that hatred of FTL
again...)

You can publish about time travel. But you can't talk
FTL, because it causes causality violations, and by
extension, time travel. blink Does anyone besides me
see how stupid this is?

I will wager this: one day, we will figure out how to
go faster than light (assuming the lazies are dead and
out of our way). It will never, ever, result in a
causality violation. You will just get there quicker.

I'm not dragging Van Flandern into this, don't worry.
I don't much go in for exploding planets. But someone
ought to take note that there's a perfectly valid
alternative for the disaster that is special
relativity, as brought forth by Tangherlini. It isn't
mathematically pretty. But neither is the mess that we
currently accept. But you can't convince true
believers of the religion of science. Debate one of
these guys, listen to what they have to say. Then go
to Sunday School, see what they have to say, and try
to ask questions and debate. These people were cut
from the same sheet of mylar.

What's the point to all this? We don't know jack
diddly squat. Not about God, about science, about the
universe, about ourselves, about the climate and/or
its change, etc. Trouble is, we can't *not* look for
answers. But we must make sure we are finding answers,
and not just making them and the story up as we go
along.

Next...

Some scoundrel does an experiment, a real, actual
experiment, and posts it to some list called Vortex. I
guess scientific experimentation is still welcome on a
list that .

Currently it has evolved into a discussion on taboo
physics reports and research. SKEPTICS BEWARE, the
topics wander from Cold Fusion, to reports of excess
energy in Free Energy devices, gravity generation and
detection, reports of theoretically impossible
phenomena, and all sorts of supposedly crackpot
claims

Two people replied to the thread (three if you count
Horace's suggestion [and a very good one too!] made in
a different thread), no discussion except off list.
Robin van Spaandonk, let me publicly thank you for
letting me discuss the experiment with you. I
appreciate it very, very much.

But the rest of you, with the aforementioned
exceptions, chose to duke out politics, religion, and
assorted nonscientific whatsit. It makes me wonder why
Bill Beatty doesn't show up around here much any more.
Is he just disgusted with this? Maybe my science is
just amateurish? Wait a sec...oh yes. This list is
directly connected to a site called AMASCI.COM.

Alright, if Morton's experiment (which I seem to have
shot down in my own research, will post more if any
interest) is not worth discussing, let's talk cold
fusion. What can I do? I'm giving no one any money.
The opportunities have been essentially wasted for two
decades. Positive here, negatives here, uh, need
better calorimeter here, let's look for ash here, to
burn/recombine or not burn/recombine, x-rays here?
Neutrons? Er, what's the theory behind it?

/Can we build a damn thing that will make a cup of
warm coffee or tea?/ If not, why not???

I'll take a moment to _really_ stir the pot here, and
publicly thank Grok. He's the only one (unless I
missed a message) who responded to this. Quote, How
come no one ever answers this oft-made reasonable
request with a working device..? The lack of any known
response is what is giving all the skeptix a
field-day.

Now that all this is outta the way, who wants to warm
up their soldering irons, throw 'the main switch,'
pull some vacuum, slam some electrons,
electrolytically fuse some stuff, reactionlessly
impel, superluminally signal, test some claims, throw
some sparks, have a Martini*** at the end of the day
and say boy howdy, that was some fun, regardless of
the outcome?

Am I gonna have to go buy a video camera to prove that
I do this crap? Or at least try?

***Perfect, of course.

--Kyle



  



Re: [Vo]:Fear and Loathing in Las Vortex

2009-03-23 Thread grok
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


As the smoke cleared, Kyle Mcallister kyle_mcallis...@yahoo.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:

 /Can we build a damn thing that will make a cup of
 warm coffee or tea?/ If not, why not???
 
 I'll take a moment to _really_ stir the pot here, and
 publicly thank Grok. He's the only one (unless I
 missed a message) who responded to this. Quote, How
 come no one ever answers this oft-made reasonable
 request with a working device..? The lack of any known
 response is what is giving all the skeptix a
 field-day.
 
 Now that all this is outta the way, who wants to warm
 up their soldering irons, throw 'the main switch,'
 pull some vacuum, slam some electrons,
 electrolytically fuse some stuff, reactionlessly
 impel, superluminally signal, test some claims, throw
 some sparks, have a Martini*** at the end of the day
 and say boy howdy, that was some fun, regardless of
 the outcome?
 
 Am I gonna have to go buy a video camera to prove that
 I do this crap? Or at least try?
 
Seems to me the most direct thing anyone could do at the moment, that
wouldn't cost the family farm, would be to duplicate the work of this guy
who's just successfully demonstrated Howard Johnson's 'HoJoRotor' (what I
call it). AFAIC for a few hundred bux, *anyone* could get a rotor running
for weex and months. And I could think of all manners of small loads that
could be attached to the rotor *to do useful, demonstated work over the
course of those many months*... Which IMO would do everything to dispell
all skepticism over what exactly was going on with this device.

Because how would anyone explain this amazing magnetic phenomenon, then..?
Assuming it worx as advertized.
;


- -- grok.







- -- 
*** FULL-SPECTRUM DOMINANCE! ***
* BOYCOTT BOURGEOIS MASS-MEDIA:  *   McNews:  UNfair  UNbalanced  *
*  Get mediaworx for your group/Internet/pirate tv/radio station!  *
  Critical endorsement only    Most sites need donations ***
* http://www.venezuelaenvideos.com Venezuela en Videos *
* http://www.actupny.org/divatv DIVA TV * Che Guevara audio, songs *
* http://www.sancristobal.cult.cu/sitios/Che/Index.HTM videos *
* http://www.videonetwork.org  i-Contact Video Network *
* http://citizen.nfb.ca/onf/info?did=901 NFB film on Guatemala *
* http://www.revolutionvideo.org  Revolution Video *
* http://www.revolutionvideo.org/alavio   Grupo Alivio [Argentina] *
**  Capitalism lives on borrowed time:  the ultimate carry trade  **
GPG fingerprint = 2E7F 2D69 4B0B C8D5 07E3  09C3 5E8D C4B4 461B B771
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAknIJNMACgkQXo3EtEYbt3EKzwCgvpLBM2YGOLMz3PauBkrDxIxk
kBsAnRPWi7S3WGCUSbSWJEepy98HeRIl
=vChj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



[Vo]:http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090127131654.htm

2009-03-23 Thread mixent
Dear Sir,

If you replace the Tokamak hot fusion part of your concept reactor with a muon
catalyzed fusion reactor, the whole becomes far more compact and cooler. 
It takes about 1 GeV on average to create a negative muon. Each such muon can
catalyze about 100 D-T reactions, producing 100 14 MeV neutrons, each of which
in turn can produce at least one 200 MeV fission reaction (and some neutrons may
have enough energy left over to bring about further fission reactions, after
inelastic scattering). That means you already have at least 20 GeV of energy out
compared to 1 GeV input. In practice careful design can result in more than 100
fusion reactions per muon, and the fission reactions will also produce some fast
neutrons which will also increase the output. IOW a 20 fold energy increase is
conservative. Even taking into account a 33% conversion efficiency from heat to
electricity, there is still at least a 6 fold gain (more if the waste heat can
be put to productive use).

The reactor can be cylindrical as in your design, with the D-T mix at the core,
and the muons injected down the axis of the cylinder.

This completely avoids all the problems of plasma containment, which is why it
so much more compact.

Not only would such a reactor burn sludge, it will also burn plutonium (left
over from weapons), natural un-enriched uranium, depleted uranium, or even
thorium (without conversion to U233). 

Since it is based on fast neutrons, it is better to use the actual metals rather
than the oxides, as the oxygen would just act as an unwanted moderator.

The core should be long and thin. The length ensures that all the muons are
captured, and the small radius ensures that the neutrons are not appreciably
slowed down by the D or T before leaving the core.
Such a reactor would extend current Uranium based energy reserves by a factor of
several hundred (taking the thorium into account).

BTW, somewhere in the blanket you will need to add some Li to create more T for
the fusion reactor. 

Potential problem:- I'm not sure how large the accelerator would need to be to
create the muons, however I would suggest a free electron laser combined with a
plasma to create a bench top accelerator (just guessing here).

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html



Re: [Vo]:http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090127131654.htm

2009-03-23 Thread grok
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


As the smoke cleared, mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:

 Not only would such a reactor burn sludge, it will also burn
 plutonium (left over from weapons), natural un-enriched uranium,
 depleted uranium, or even thorium (without conversion to U233). 
 
 Since it is based on fast neutrons, it is better to use the actual
 metals rather than the oxides, as the oxygen would just act as an
 unwanted moderator.

I always knew there was a way to burn up all that fission waste product
(million-year storage my hairy ass...) What about all the containment
vessels and tubing and equipment damaged by neutron bombardment? That's
some huge mass of junk by now, ain't it?


- -- grok.








- -- 
** FULL-SPECTRUM DOMINANCE! 
*BOYCOTT BOURGEOIS*   Get your news  analysis *
*  MASS-MEDIA:*   from the Best on the Web *
  Critical endorsement only  Most sites need donations  
* http://www.radio4all.org/unwelcome  Unwelcome Guests *
* http://205.201.10.12:8000/   Blast Furnace Radio *
* http://radio.portland.indymedia.org:8000/ Portland IndyMedia *
* http://helix.kfai.org:8000/kfai-mp3-24M KFAI Minneapolis *
* http://live.str3am.com:2850/   Radical Radio *
* http://www.outfarpress.com/outfarpress/shortwave.shtml SW Report *
  DEATH TO NEOLIBERALISM  **
GPG fingerprint = 2E7F 2D69 4B0B C8D5 07E3  09C3 5E8D C4B4 461B B771
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAknIMHgACgkQXo3EtEYbt3FvpwCgr1bgBVO6Ocea+WIqz/d92kvN
B68An0IQxY8+JxeY0xzteRdLay29ht0Y
=vM/x
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [Vo]:Red Letter Day

2009-03-23 Thread thomas malloy

Jones Beene wrote:


Unfortunately, here on a wayward planet formerly ruled and nearly bankrupted by a Confederacy of 
hawkish Dunces - we cannot quip you've come a long way, baby ... more like you've 
come the wrong way, baby 
 

Just remember Jones, there really are people who want to take over the 
World, and an Oligarchy who has.



--- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- 
http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---



[Vo]:LENR makes the BBC headlines

2009-03-23 Thread thomas malloy

BBC does LENR, see

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7959183.stm

I sent this feedback, It's about time, there's only been 3000+ papers 
published, see lenr-canr.org



--- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- 
http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---