http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a67cf72fe27770f9ec992da18169937d.a1show_article=1
Scientists in possible cold fusion breakthrough
Mar 24 11:49 AM US/Eastern
Researchers at a US Navy laboratory have unveiled what they say is
significant evidence of cold fusion, a potential
Mizuno called me yesterday with a few more details about the
presentations at the ACS conference.
The paper by Kitamura (which I believe was presented by Takahashi)
described a replication of Arata's older technique with the double
structured cathode (DS cathode) and Pd-black. The Pd black
I forgot to mention --
A television production crew from the Asahi Television Corporation
accompanied Mizuno to the ACS conference, and they filmed his
presentation. (Maybe it was local stringers working for Asahi?) They
are supposed to broadcast a segment about him in the near future. He
I do not see any problem with Krivit's characterization of cold fusion.
In a sense, all man-made nuclear systems are a hybrid of either
chemical or mechanical systems plus nuclear power. In a bomb, a
chemical reaction triggers a fission reaction which in turn triggers
a fusion reaction. In a
Actually the issue is more complicated than Jed describes.
Conventional belief is that the chemical environment has very little
or no effect on whether a nuclear reaction will occur. The cold
fusion process challenges this belief.
Normally, nuclear processes require too much energy to
Edmund Storms wrote:
Actually the issue is more complicated than Jed describes.
I had in mind more of an analogy than a physical description. Plus I
had in mind that some of the key breakthroughs in the Manhattan
Project were in chemical explosives and the timing of triggering
explosions,
To our knowledge, this is the first scientific report of the
production of highly energetic neutrons from a LENR device, added the
study's co-author in a statement.
Really? REALLY really?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:
The press coverage of the ACS meeting and the 20th anniversary has
increased the number of visits and downloads.
Date, Downloads, Visits
03/19/2009 728519
03/20/2009 374568
03/21/2009 247406
03/22/2009 649494
03/23/2009 1,008 2,034
Theory mavins with enquiring minds may want to see:
Frisone, F. The Coulomb Barrier not Static in QED, A correction to
the Theory by Preparata on the Phenomenon of Cold Fusion and
Theoretical hypothesis. in ICCF-14 International Conference on
Condensed Matter Nuclear Science. 2008.
It's interesting and rather gratifying that the ACS provided the press
coverage and interest that the APS failed to do.
Ed
On Mar 25, 2009, at 12:49 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
The press coverage of the ACS meeting and the 20th anniversary has
increased the number of visits and downloads.
Edmund Storms wrote:
It's interesting and rather gratifying that the ACS provided the press
coverage and interest that the APS failed to do.
Yes. They did a bang up job. We owe Michael Bernstein our thanks. I
hope that the skeptics are not bothering him.
- Jed
On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:05 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I think the electron doesn't spiral into the nucleus because it
doesn't have
enough angular momentum to create a photon, hence it can't radiate,
which means
it can't lose energy.
This argument must not be true. There is a finite
Even Fox News sez: Navy Chemist May Have Rediscovered 'Cold Fusion'
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510589,00.html\
On the 20th anniversary of PF's announcement it's nice to see the
amount of positive exposure that has has been coming out. Granted, not
all of it is positive, but encouraging
Not sure if Robert Park's recent publication Superstition has been
mention here or not. I saw a copy at Barns and Noble last week.
http://www.amazon.com/Superstition-Science-Robert-L-Park/dp/0691133557/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1238011611sr=1-1
http://tinyurl.com/d6vzd5
I immediately flipped
Remove backslash from URL:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510589,00.html
I clicked on the natural science link here and found a mind-boggling article:
Scientists: Animals Probably Enjoy Sex Too
. . .
Animals obviously hook up, at least during mating season. But do they like it?
Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
Not sure if Robert Park's recent publication Superstition has been
mention here or not. I saw a copy at Barns and Noble last week.
http://www.amazon.com/Superstition-Science-Robert-L-Park/dp/0691133557/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1238011611sr=1-1
Ah, but a
Jed sez:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510589,00.html
I clicked on the natural science link here and found a mind-boggling
article:
Scientists: Animals Probably Enjoy Sex Too
. . .
Animals obviously hook up, at least during mating season. But do they like
it?
According to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
Remove backslash from URL:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510589,00.html
I clicked on the natural science link here and found a mind-boggling
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner
In fact, some molecular orbitals exist in a figure 8 configuration, where
the center of the 8 is the nucleus, thus guaranteeing constant nuclear
traverses.
[JB:] Understanding the figure 8 configuration is perhaps the most important
basic
OrionWorks wrote:
Scientists: Animals Probably Enjoy Sex Too
. . .
Animals obviously hook up, at least during mating season. But do they like
it?
Do they like it
Well... I can only go by my own observations.
This is getting seriously off topic, but perhaps someone should fund
a
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:56:45 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Theory mavins with enquiring minds may want to see:
Frisone, F. The Coulomb Barrier not Static in QED, A correction to
the Theory by Preparata on the Phenomenon of Cold Fusion and
Theoretical hypothesis. in
Instead of asking why the electron doesn't spiral into the nucleus,
perhaps one should question the law(s) that lead one to expect it should
spiral into nucleus.
The mathematical strategy of quantizing energy saves the law(s) and
avoids the latter question.
Harry
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:46:46 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:05 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I think the electron doesn't spiral into the nucleus because it
doesn't have
enough angular momentum to create a photon, hence it can't radiate,
- Original Message - From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 4:50 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:ref QED -Original Message- From: Horace HeffnerIn fact, some molecular orbitals exist in a figure 8 configuration, where the center of the 8 is the nucleus,
Jones Beene wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner
In fact, some molecular orbitals exist in a figure 8 configuration, where
the center of the 8 is the nucleus, thus guaranteeing constant nuclear
traverses.
[JB:] Understanding the figure 8 configuration is
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:14:41 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Remove backslash from URL:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510589,00.html
[snip]
It isn't clear to me why a triple track necessarily implies energetic
*neutrons*.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
26 matches
Mail list logo
