Well, we can see the influence of the pathological skeptics in the
APS. They still insist that the phenomenon is not worthy of having
the APS show any endorsement, no matter how indirect. The fact that
the APS has secessions about CF at their conferences, that a very
large data
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
Well, we can see the influence of the pathological skeptics in the APS.
They still insist that the phenomenon is not worthy of having the APS
show
http://cordis.europa.eu/fetch?CALLER=EN_NEWSACTION=DSESSION=RCN=30717
New research from Switzerland and the UK reveals that, somewhat
paradoxically, plants absorb more carbon dioxide (CO2) when the
atmosphere is polluted than they do under cleaner skies.
OK that is the finding. Now for the
Umm, thats been known since biosphere 2 days. They did several
experiments that showed that, but also showed that plants, especially
trees, grew taller but skinner, more knotted (bad for the logging
industry!) and that other plants grew at weird rates as well, and that
it generally caused havoc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
mounted the barricade and roared out:
So why are we waiting? Political inertia.
No, we are waiting because of capitalist vested interests -- which put
their elite interests ahead of the
It appears from your analysis that the earth has more self regulating
capability than most experts give it credit for. Further, it seems to me
that it will be better to observe and collect more data for a while instead
of rushing off to do something. Better to do nothing than to do the wrong
The thing is, we are ALREADY doing something. If we want to do
nothing, then we cut all manmade co2 sources instantly. doing
SOMETHING is doing just what we are doing already.
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Jeff Fink rev...@ptd.net wrote:
It appears from your analysis that the earth has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Jeff Fink rev...@ptd.net
mounted the barricade and roared out:
It appears from your analysis that the earth has more self regulating
capability than most experts give it credit for. Further, it seems to me
that it will be
You and many people Jeff, miss an important issue about finding ways
to reduce CO2 emission. Yes it is expensive, but so are all changes
in technology. The expense issue is only a distraction raised by
industries that will be harmed by the new technology. In contrast, the
general
Nickel crash kick-started evolution
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2009/04/09/2539904.htm
Harry
Hi,
This looks to my untrained eye like a Trilobite.
http://english.pravda.ru/img/idb/photo/3-1323.jpg
(see also http://english.pravda.ru/photo/report/creature-2804/1/)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
Harbach Jak wrote:
~*~NEWTON is LEFT HITCH-HICKING~*~Einstein Hawking Feynman brought
us here*
Anita @ Boeing Phantom Works: Since 'Spooky action @ Distance' is a
Proven; and Russia has created a functional
IN SHORT: Parallel-adjacent AEXO-DarkSpace is indeed TACHYON-FIELD SPACE.
trilos didnt have the tail
looks like a tadpole shrimp to me
http://www.caver.net/shrimp.html
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 8:21 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Hi,
This looks to my untrained eye like a Trilobite.
http://english.pravda.ru/img/idb/photo/3-1323.jpg
(see also
In reply to leaking pen's message of Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:31:53 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
trilos didnt have the tail
Perhaps the tail is soft tissue.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
14 matches
Mail list logo
