Looks like a kind of horseshoe crab:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/artour_a/1472277507/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_crab
On Apr 25, 2009, at 7:21 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Hi,
This looks to my untrained eye like a Trilobite.
http://english.pravda.ru/img/idb/photo/3-1323.jpg
What I mean by do nothing is leave the CO2 production rates as they are.
You talk of cutting man made CO2 to zero like it is possible and desirable.
You are literally saying that doing nothing is contributing no manmade CO2
to the environment which means the extinction of the human race!
No
I'm all for replacing fossil fuel powered machines with equal or superior
nonpolluting alternatives. So far, nothing but nuclear comes close. All I
am saying is, don't shut down, dismantle, or otherwise cripple the fossil
fuel industry until a viable alternative is commercially available. Solar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Looks like a kind of horseshoe crab:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/artour_a/1472277507/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_crab
Ya, it sure loox like a horseshoe crab -- with IMO distinct throwback
characteristix of ancient bony fish: i.e.
From Ed Storms
Well, we can see the influence of the pathological skeptics in the APS.
They still insist that the phenomenon is not worthy of having the APS
show any endorsement, no matter how indirect.
From Grok:
So imagine the great fun you will have, writing the definitive
book about all
Hey, wait a minute, maybe that's Bob Park's brain that fell out.
“Techie” or tekkie not to be confused with trekkie although there is a lot
of overlap...
Appropriate for a Sunday – for those
“worshiping” at aterminal - the new “altar”
so to speak, not to mention a further tek-surprise (below) …
Techie is a ostensibly a derivative of the word “technology,”
See, theres a big difference between crippling, and causing them to
not make as big of a profit. (remember, this is the industry that has
made new record profits every quarter for the past several years.
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 5:20 AM, Jeff Fink rev...@ptd.net wrote:
I'm all for replacing
No, i speak of cutting to zero sarcastically. I used it to make a
point that doing NOTHING is just that, doing NOTHING, and that we are
already doing something by producing co2, so your statement of, we
should do nothing is meaningless. Its like saying, we are all rowing
our boat down river,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
More scientists -- in this case, biologists -- forced to the fringe by
scoffing colleagues:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanobe
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2001/12/19/444160.htm
This all ties in with the martian meteorite controversy.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So imagine the great fun you will have, writing the definitive
book about all this.
Ed Storms may have already had written his definitive book on the subject:
See:
http://lenr-canr.org/Introduction.html#StormsBook
So time for a new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Solar and wind are obviously not it for numerous reasons already posted
on this forum.
What are the main reasons, again? I'm not aware of any inherent ones,
despite claims to the contrary. For instance: AFAIC we could blanket the
Sahara with solar
Are are you the guy who writes copy for the labels on Dr. Bronner's castille
soap?
- R
_
From: Harbach Jak [mailto:ja.harc...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 9:32 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Tribute~2-Hawking~*~Newton left hitch-hiking~;-) ConceptCraft
Try this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHXOj3h6P5oNR=1
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:43 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Hey, wait a minute, maybe that's Bob Park's brain that fell out.
--
*An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
This has a link to Steve's page about Garwin, which is pretty damning:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/blog/?p=67
Take careful note of the following:
If any CF supporter should ever be even slightly dishonest, it's the most
disgusting thing
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, William Beaty wrote:
If any CF supporter should ever be even slightly dishonest, it's the most
disgusting thing imaginable, right? It damns the entire CF community! But if
a CF skeptic pulls the sort of dishonest ploy that Garwin does ...it means
that he's only human.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, William Beaty wrote:
If any CF supporter should ever be even slightly dishonest, it's the
most disgusting thing imaginable, right?
We are being treated to a general breakdown in intellectual integrity
these days in a wide range of subjects. We see this most clearly in
science, not just cold fusion, because this subject has objective ways
to decide what is true and what is not. As a result, when people are
found to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
We see a similar analogy in the financial system. If a person robs a
bank, he is punished, because a law has been broken. However, if the
banker robs
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:45:08 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
If you want a reliable and continous supply of power, solar and wind
will not give you that unless you can figure out how to store the
generated power cost effectively.
[snip]
As already discussed frequently on
- Original Message -
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Date: Monday, April 27, 2009 0:57 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Not what Algore wanted to hear
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:45:08 -
0400:Hi,
[snip]
If you want a reliable and continous supply of power, solar and
21 matches
Mail list logo
