What I mean by do nothing is leave the CO2 production rates as they are. You talk of cutting man made CO2 to zero like it is possible and desirable. You are literally saying that doing nothing is contributing no manmade CO2 to the environment which means the extinction of the human race!
No fossil fueled power plants, no cooking fires to support the resulting cave man existence, and finally, no breathing. I used to think like this back in junior high school, that the biggest problem on earth is people, and that if we eliminate all people the planet would be perfect. I outgrew those thoughts. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: leaking pen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 1:47 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Not what Algore wanted to hear The thing is, we are ALREADY doing something. If we want to do nothing, then we cut all manmade co2 sources instantly. doing SOMETHING is doing just what we are doing already. On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Jeff Fink <[email protected]> wrote: > It appears from your analysis that the earth has more self regulating > capability than most "experts" give it credit for. Further, it seems to me > that it will be better to observe and collect more data for a while instead > of rushing off to do something. Better to do nothing than to do the wrong > thing, especially if that wrong thing is massively expensive. Misguided, > high priced environmental repairs could collapse an already weakened world > economy. > > Jeff >
