On Feb 23, 2010, at 9:48 PM, Rich Murray wrote:
for Extraordinary Error, with the blog, click on the Go to
Homepage: while for #42, use http://groups.yahoo.com/group/
AstroDeep/messages and then go to #42: Rich Murray, Santa Fe, New
Mexico 2010.02.23
Sometimes yahoogroups is slow to make
I wrote:
You can see that the power levels are really not that varied, and
there is practically no real-time correlation to the helium.
Also bear in mind those are instantaneous power levels, and there is
no telling what it was doing in the instant before they were taken.
For example, data
On Feb 23, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
Consider Frick's first law of steady state diffusion, which states
the flow vector J_i for species i is proportional to the
concentration vector (d c_i)/( d x) in typical cell conditions,
i.e., one dimensionally speaking:
J_i = - D
Hi Horace,
Another typo: Frick instead of Fick.
All these macroscopic phenomena you discuss regarding the motion of
ions in an electrolyte boil down, at the atomic scale, to the electric
force, don't you agree?
In any case, in a dense conductor, whether liquid or solid or even a
dense gas such
Jed,
Without seeing a lot more heat data, I have to agree, it is difficult to
derive any meaning from this and that there is, as you say, practically no
real-time correlation to the helium. We also are missing a lot of
information about their method of helium sampling.
Steve
At 08:29 PM
Steven Krivit wrote:
Without seeing a lot more heat data, I have to agree, it is
difficult to derive any meaning from this and that there is, as you
say, practically no real-time correlation to the helium.
I have no difficulty deriving meaning from this. Again, maybe I am
missing something
(I was amused to see a skeptic the other day suggest that when Rob
Duncan visited Energetics Technology, he should have surreptitiously
attached a flask to the cell and taken a sample of helium to see if it
really is fusion. I told the skeptic you have to design the experiment
from the
Has Naudin just made his transformer more efficient...or is it really a
generator?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xS6Fknxv18
Harry
__
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot
with
ALTERATE MODEL/Solar White-Hole-Core: From the posit that we are surrounded
and ubiquitously permeated by an Parent Aexocosmos whole-energy density--speed
level which is that of a Black-Hole-Singularity nexus point. The
Black-Singularity is indeed the fluid dynamic egress-point of our
MASS GRAVITY IS A SINGULARITY FUNCTION; period. . .///Re:
Star/Sun:CoreWhiteHole-Model--(correction)
ALTERATE MODEL/Solar White-Hole-Core: From the posit that we are surrounded
and ubiquitously permeated by an Parent Aexocosmos whole-energy density--speed
level which is that of a
On Feb 24, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Hi Horace,
Another typo: Frick instead of Fick.
That's a funny one! Must have been a Freudian slip. 8^)
All these macroscopic phenomena you discuss regarding the motion of
ions in an electrolyte boil down, at the atomic scale, to the
On Feb 23, 2010, at 9:51 AM, Steven Krivit wrote:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/SRI-Expt-HH/SRI-Experiment-
HH.shtml
Vorts,
I have deliberately not provided any explanation, analysis or
interpretation.
Instead, I'd like to hear your thoughts first.
In particular, I'd like to
On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Has Naudin just made his transformer more efficient...or is it
really a generator?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xS6Fknxv18
Harry
The site says Wooww, the power at the OUTPUT is greatly increased
without significant change at the DC
A variation. Pulse in primaries P1 or P2 cuts permanent B through
secondaries S1 or S2.
inline: sketch.jpg
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
From: Horace:
...
The site says Wooww, the power at the OUTPUT is greatly increased
without significant change at the DC input , yet there is no
effort made to measure input power, only current. It would make more
sense to get the I and V traces for the input coil.
It pretty obvious
A silly variation, but closer in nature.
inline: 100_2469.jpg
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
On Feb 24, 2010, at 5:58 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From: Horace:
...
The site says Wooww, the power at the OUTPUT is greatly increased
without significant change at the DC input , yet there is no
effort made to measure input power, only current. It would make more
inline: 100_2470.jpg
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
100_2470.JPG
On Feb 24, 2010, at 5:58 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From: Horace:
...
The site says Wooww, the power at the OUTPUT is greatly increased
without significant change at the DC input , yet there is no
effort made to measure input power, only current.
The above should
I haven't taken the time to look into this in detail, but my first
impression is that, unless there is a typo, it makes no sense at all
to attempt to draw the 23.82 MeV line through Fig. 1, or to draw any
conclusions from the graph as to energy per helium atom produced.
Perhaps I'm misreading
- Original Message
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, February 24, 2010 9:30:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Naudin's improved generator
On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Has Naudin just made his transformer more
The Edge-on Grid Method document, describing a variation of the
SPAWAR cell, has been edited and a drawing included:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/EdgeOnGrid.pdf
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
- Original Message
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, February 24, 2010 9:30:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Naudin's improved generator
On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Has
23 matches
Mail list logo
