There is a big difference between a certain physical process being valid
and the commercial viability of a product based on that process.
Just because a spark will explode gasoline vapor does not imply that a
Lamborghini can be designed to use that principle or that the car will sell
in the
That's why I coupled the two probabilities upthread. Did you read the
thread?
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg93531.html
Let's say you think there's a 66% chance that Rossi's real and a 50%
chance that CYPW will be in the right commercial place to take advantage.
That means
From ECAT World
Rossi on His Anxiety Over E-Cat Test Results
Posted on June 9, 2014 by admin http://www.e-catworld.com/author/admin/ • 62
Comments
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/06/09/rossi-on-his-anxiety-over-e-cat-test-results/#comments
Yes, but just because there are some things that are real but not very
commercially viable, and just because in our ignorance we may be unable to
say if it is commercially viable or not does not change the fact of what it
is.
It either is real and useful, real and useless to some degree and
Axil, Good point regarding proof of the effect and actual construction of a
useful product. The lack of evidence to date suggest the effect, if real, is
extremely self destructive making replication at low power density difficult
enough but extracting high power density is exponentially more
John, I agree this is an etheric effect and has the same difficulties MM
encountered trying to prove a spatial based ether. IMHO Naudt’s paper
describing hydrinos as relativistic hydrogen holds a key to much of this –
and puts the fractional/shrinking hydrogen on a plane 90 degrees to our
Here is a new/old spin on LENR.
Executive summary: the energy gain in LENR can be described as retained
spin energy - involving the Higgs particle as an energy sink.
We speculated about the Higgs - LENR connection some time ago - and the
elements xenon, cesium barium, lanthanum and cerium - all
On 24.05.2014 02:58, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to MarkI-ZeroPoint's message of Sun, 18 May 2014 17:27:53 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Just a FYI for those interested in superconductors and gravity.
http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/05/update-on-podkletnov-gravity.html
The propagation time of
“*John, I agree this is an etheric effect and has the same difficulties MM
encountered trying to prove a spatial based ether.”*
*An in depth understanding of the LENR mechanism will show that LENR is an
etheric effect. LENR implies non-locality.*
*Nonlocality*
*Definition: a direct
How do you split the electron?
At one time this was considered impossible, then it became a mathematical
abstraction, then a controversial experiment and later: let me count the
ways... :-)
Aside from the FQHE, we should consider that two years ago an accredited
research team observed an
Axil, I think you need to add ether or aether to your spell check
dictionary.
Either or both, but not neither or you end up with 'either' ;)
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
“*John, I agree this is an etheric effect and has the same difficulties
MM
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Any electron getting close to the gateway will be tightly confined at
temperatures close to absolute zero and the result could be that only the
spinon is retained in 3-space, while the holon and orbiton become properties
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:09 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Axil, I think you need to add ether or aether to your spell check
dictionary.
Either or both, but not neither or you end up with 'either' ;)
Or 'aeither'. :-)
In reply to linuxball's message of Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:56:41 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Hi Robin,
this is most likely a copy-and-paste error. It should read: The delay
was 63±1 ns,
corresponding to a propagation speed of 64c.
See chapter 8 of the following PDF sample document on page 32-34:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:09 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Axil, I think you need to add ether or aether to your spell check
dictionary.
Either or both, but not neither or you end up with 'either' ;)
reading the article... shoot. That soundsalmost identical to a gravity
shielding experiment I created fictionally for my webcomic... Zounds!
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 5:58 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to MarkI-ZeroPoint's message of Sun, 18 May 2014 17:27:53 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
16 matches
Mail list logo
