I tell ya what, Lennart. Because I am so magnanimous in spirit and to
demonstrate that I have "grown out of the sandbox", I will give you the
last word. Have at it.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Lennart Thornros
wrote:
> Kevin I hope you will grow out of the sandbox one day.
> On Aug 11, 2
Click on the link, sit back and listen to some good music and watch
the time elapse video of the sky, I believe that is our quantum vacuum
field(gravity) inflating right above our heads and interacting with
gasses in our atmosphere and creating water vapor. That is why the
atmosphere also bends and
Yes, more magnetic flux more decay. Oscillating magnetic fields induce
electrical currents which can cause decay.
I think gravity(quantum vacuum) and magnetic fields are related. I've
tried to fit it to M Theory and relate it to what you and Jones and Ed and
Fran are all sharing.
I think our gra
Agreed and you will find that there is no difference.
GW is the new Darwinism religion. Pseudo-science that can not stand up to
closer scrutiny.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: leaking pen
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 12:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Pa
More gravitational flux, more decay.
Don't you mean more magnetic flux, more decay?
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:16 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote:
> Everything is decaying faster around pulsed microwave radar towers, I am
> convinced of that. As I mentioned before, I think "time" is really a rate
> of
Everything is decaying faster around pulsed microwave radar towers, I am
convinced of that. As I mentioned before, I think "time" is really a rate
of decay. More gravitational flux, more decay. "Time is really the decay
it takes to go from one place to the other", which varies.
Just my take on
It looks to me like magnetism speeds up the march of time by straitening
out the curved space imposed by matter on space/time. The larger that the
density of matter is, the greater is the effects of magnetism to accelerate
time.
Does anybody has an opinion one way or the other?
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 27 Jul 2014 07:08:39 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Steve You probably do not take this too seriously, so you are not missing
>the fact that it is not science it is hucksterism with a dose of
>sophistication. The 40% conversion ratio should make it clear to an
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> This
> emphasis on Aspect is the perfect example of this lack of competence. QED.
>
Cute.
so run it again with a fan inside. issue fixed!
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:18 AM, H Veeder wrote:
>
> Paper proves Bill Nye's faked 'greenhouse effect' experiment is also based
> on the wrong 'basic physics'
>
>
> http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.ca/2014/08/paper-proves-bill-nyes-faked-greenhouse
Paper proves Bill Nye's faked 'greenhouse effect' experiment is also based
on the wrong 'basic physics'
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.ca/2014/08/paper-proves-bill-nyes-faked-greenhouse.html
"Although not an accurate demonstration of the physics of climate change,
the experiment we have considered
Kevin I hope you will grow out of the sandbox one day.
On Aug 11, 2014 11:57 PM, "Kevin O'Malley" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Lennart Thornros
> wrote:
>
>> I do not know that I intended to provoke.
>>
> ***Weasel words from a weasel. You know your own intention, but here yo
There are bad mistakes or possibly wrong interpretation. But, I already
summarized, people did not seem to care.
2014-08-12 11:10 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell :
>
> Assuming Gamberale's report is accurate, I would say that rises to the
> level of criminal fraud. I assume it is accurate. I have no reas
From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe
entangelment ...
Just to note, I have a few issues with Mills CQM.
1. Transients seam to not be covered by the theory, only the
eigen states
2. I don't know how you do com
Kevin O'Malley wrote:
> I do not know whether they are fraudulent because I'm not a police
> detective and I do not have the power of subpoena. They seem suspicious. I
> would not do business with them.
> ***Isn't that a bit sideways, considering that you DID do business with
> them and they wen
15 matches
Mail list logo
