RE: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report--
What I find most interesting is that Elforsk, Gullstrom and Dr. Myron Evans have begun corresponding… Go to this site and do a search for LENR: https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/ https://drmyronevans.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/a226thpaper.pdf https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/for-posting-uft226-sections-1-and-2/ https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/for-posting-background-notes-to-uft226/ Evans’ opinion about where fizzix took a wrong turn… “QED and QCD have their hidden adjustable parameters and their unobservables (virtual particles). They are not precise theories at all, and they are plagued with artificially removed infinities (renormalization). With the benefit of forty years of experience in chemical and theoretical physics I think that QED was a wrong turning entirely.” -mark iverson From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:34 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report-- Mats Lewan in a revised addition to his book on Rossi earlier this year has added a comment about a paper from Carl-Oscar Gullström. He mentions that Carl-Oscar Gullström’s paper, “Low Radiation fusion through bound neutron Tunneling” got some positive attention from Bo Höistad, one of the authors of the Lugano report who told Mats: “It is very interesting. It fits like a glove with our results, both the isotopic changes and the absence of radiation. It is the first time that I see a scenario that could explain the results—it has not existed before!” The paper can be found form E-Cat World here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/244393652/Low-radiation-fusion-through-bound-neutron-tunneling This may be the answer to the Rossi effect that the Swedes are looking for. Carl-Oscar is a student at Uppsala University-- Bravo, Bob Cook
Re: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report--
Solved, I think it is grape power https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCNNqgKqnaQ On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Neutron as produced, but the question is when. Are they primary to causation or are these neutron formed as an stabilizing adjustment of the nucleus after the LENR reaction takes place? The question is what gets through the coulomb barrier: neutrons, EMF, protons? On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote: Mats Lewan in a revised addition to his book on Rossi earlier this year has added a comment about a paper from Carl-Oscar Gullström. He mentions that Carl-Oscar Gullström’s paper, “Low Radiation fusion through bound neutron Tunneling” got some positive attention from Bo Höistad, one of the authors of the Lugano report who told Mats: “It is very interesting. It fits like a glove with our results, both the isotopic changes and the absence of radiation. It is the first time that I see a scenario that could explain the results—it has not existed before!” The paper can be found form E-Cat World here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/244393652/Low-radiation-fusion-through-bound-neutron-tunneling This may be the answer to the Rossi effect that the Swedes are looking for. Carl-Oscar is a student at Uppsala University-- Bravo, Bob Cook
[Vo]:Ballistic spin transport
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/123 Viewpoint: Spin Transport Goes Ballistic Ballistic spin transport has been observed in a two dimension electron gas forms between two semiconductors. This two dimensional electron gas situation is very much like what is happening in surface plasmon polariton formation. For LENR, one of the powerful EMF amplification factors is directional and highly focused spin projection. Magnetic EMF is projected in a tight beam in which the inverse square law does not dilute the power of the beam. A new theory is forthcoming in the ballistic projection of spin. Here is a case where progress in LENR RD is progressing unbeknownst to the rank and file in science.
Re: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report--
These papers identified by Mark reveal how Standard Physics used fudge factors in complex Dirac equations to fit nature. This issue has not been addressed very well in standard physics classes in the US and elsewhere, to my knowledge. I wonder why not? We have the computational capability of modern computers to thank for the revelation, since they do not need the introduction of fudge factors to solve the Dirac equation for various testable physical systems. I think this is what Evans, etal., are saying. Also Evans has taken action to set up a conference (Skype, I think) to review the published theories by the wordpress.com with Elforsk and Gullstrom relative to the Lugano results. Apparently, Axel Westrenius has been instrumental in setting up the conference and suggested the connection of the Lugano results, the Gullstrom paper and the wordpress.com theory cited by Mark. He apparently has been in communication with Evans for some time. It is interesting to note who else is involved and/or participates in the conference. It may have already happened. The plot thickens, as more people are throwing their hat in the ring and hoping for fame associated with explaining the Rossi Effect. Bob From: MarkI-ZeroPoint To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 12:06 AM Subject: RE: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report-- What I find most interesting is that Elforsk, Gullstrom and Dr. Myron Evans have begun corresponding… Go to this site and do a search for LENR: https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/ https://drmyronevans.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/a226thpaper.pdf https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/for-posting-uft226-sections-1-and-2/ https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/for-posting-background-notes-to-uft226/ Evans’ opinion about where fizzix took a wrong turn… “QED and QCD have their hidden adjustable parameters and their unobservables (virtual particles). They are not precise theories at all, and they are plagued with artificially removed infinities (renormalization). With the benefit of forty years of experience in chemical and theoretical physics I think that QED was a wrong turning entirely.” -mark iverson From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:34 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report-- Mats Lewan in a revised addition to his book on Rossi earlier this year has added a comment about a paper from Carl-Oscar Gullström. He mentions that Carl-Oscar Gullström’s paper, “Low Radiation fusion through bound neutron Tunneling” got some positive attention from Bo Höistad, one of the authors of the Lugano report who told Mats: “It is very interesting. It fits like a glove with our results, both the isotopic changes and the absence of radiation. It is the first time that I see a scenario that could explain the results—it has not existed before!” The paper can be found form E-Cat World here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/244393652/Low-radiation-fusion-through-bound-neutron-tunneling This may be the answer to the Rossi effect that the Swedes are looking for. Carl-Oscar is a student at Uppsala University-- Bravo, Bob Cook
Re: [Vo]:Ballistic spin transport
Spin coupling is finally being identified along with its transfer of energy from one place to another in a coherent system. Changes in the mass of stable systems and mechanism for this will be next. My guess it will be as if the coherent system wants to reach its lowest stable energy state and it does using spin interactions and the conservation of angular momentum. The local B magnetic field will be the key to allowing such transitions to occur in the solid state. The magnetic field associated with the plasmon polariton condition provides the necessary local B field. Bob Cook - Original Message - From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 9:29 AM Subject: [Vo]:Ballistic spin transport http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/123 Viewpoint: Spin Transport Goes Ballistic Ballistic spin transport has been observed in a two dimension electron gas forms between two semiconductors. This two dimensional electron gas situation is very much like what is happening in surface plasmon polariton formation. For LENR, one of the powerful EMF amplification factors is directional and highly focused spin projection. Magnetic EMF is projected in a tight beam in which the inverse square law does not dilute the power of the beam. A new theory is forthcoming in the ballistic projection of spin. Here is a case where progress in LENR RD is progressing unbeknownst to the rank and file in science.
RE: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report--
Morning Bob, Vorts, Evans has a pretty large following, and has been a *very* productive theorist, but is still marginalized by the mainstream… gee, don’t know why! ;-) I am encouraged by having some newbie theorists take a shot at LENR… can only help raise awareness. ATTN: ZPF/Casimir fans… For those who are looking at a possible connection with the ZPF/vacuum, you might want to check out my posting on 11/22, “Water, out with the old, in with the new? U-tube vid” He discusses possible interaction with the vacuum to explain some water anomalies… RE: missing neutrons and non-dead grad students… Also, the scientist mentions how an absorbed photon may not be emitted as usual when quantum coherence is present. -mark From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 9:42 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report-- These papers identified by Mark reveal how Standard Physics used fudge factors in complex Dirac equations to fit nature. This issue has not been addressed very well in standard physics classes in the US and elsewhere, to my knowledge. I wonder why not? We have the computational capability of modern computers to thank for the revelation, since they do not need the introduction of fudge factors to solve the Dirac equation for various testable physical systems. I think this is what Evans, etal., are saying. Also Evans has taken action to set up a conference (Skype, I think) to review the published theories by the wordpress.com with Elforsk and Gullstrom relative to the Lugano results. Apparently, Axel Westrenius has been instrumental in setting up the conference and suggested the connection of the Lugano results, the Gullstrom paper and the wordpress.com theory cited by Mark. He apparently has been in communication with Evans for some time. It is interesting to note who else is involved and/or participates in the conference. It may have already happened. The plot thickens, as more people are throwing their hat in the ring and hoping for fame associated with explaining the Rossi Effect. Bob From: MarkI-ZeroPoint mailto:zeropo...@charter.net To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 12:06 AM Subject: RE: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report-- What I find most interesting is that Elforsk, Gullstrom and Dr. Myron Evans have begun corresponding… Go to this site and do a search for LENR: https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/ https://drmyronevans.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/a226thpaper.pdf https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/for-posting-uft226-sections-1-and-2/ https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/for-posting-background-notes-to-uft226/ Evans’ opinion about where fizzix took a wrong turn… “QED and QCD have their hidden adjustable parameters and their unobservables (virtual particles). They are not precise theories at all, and they are plagued with artificially removed infinities (renormalization). With the benefit of forty years of experience in chemical and theoretical physics I think that QED was a wrong turning entirely.” -mark iverson From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:34 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report-- Mats Lewan in a revised addition to his book on Rossi earlier this year has added a comment about a paper from Carl-Oscar Gullström. He mentions that Carl-Oscar Gullström’s paper, “Low Radiation fusion through bound neutron Tunneling” got some positive attention from Bo Höistad, one of the authors of the Lugano report who told Mats: “It is very interesting. It fits like a glove with our results, both the isotopic changes and the absence of radiation. It is the first time that I see a scenario that could explain the results—it has not existed before!” The paper can be found form E-Cat World here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/244393652/Low-radiation-fusion-through-bound-neutron-tunneling This may be the answer to the Rossi effect that the Swedes are looking for. Carl-Oscar is a student at Uppsala University-- Bravo, Bob Cook
[Vo]:today's info re LENR and surroundings
just published: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/12/shared-daily-lenr-discoveries-dec-4-2014.html From Legendary CF Events to the unexpected new energy future Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:RE: Plasma: Casimir and Yukawa mesons
My analysis have found that the fields of matter are pinned into its structure at an elastic discontinuities. Fields are pinned into superconductores at defects. Why not use the same principle universally. -Original Message- From: Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wed, Dec 3, 2014 2:20 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: Plasma: Casimir and Yukawa mesons Fran-- Some Vorts are bred to stay on point. You and Axil seem to have good breeding. Bob - Original Message - From: Roarty, Francis X To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: Plasma: Casimir and Yukawa mesons Bob, they mention 2 items I took careful note of 1 - an old problem coined the Casimir mousetrap [snip] The problem we intend to revisit is similar in spirit to the old story called the Casimir mousetrap for the stability of charged electrons. [10, 13] The negative charges on an electron surface give rise to a repulsive force between the different parts of the surface that has to be counteracted by an attractive force in order for the electron to have a finite radius. Casimir proposed that such attractive Poincaré stresses could come from the zero-point energy of electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations. [9] A number of attempts have been made to compute such Casimir energies. [1013] However, all concluded that while the magnitude of the interaction was correct, it had the wrong sign. Further it gave a repulsive force. [1013] [/snip] I think this reinforces my segregation theory where the negative energy reservoir in a Casimir cavity is always balanced by a positive energy reservoir being produced by the geometry.. the math is solving for an equal but opposite force spread inside and throughout the lattice geometry forming the plates. IMHO this explains how Casimir effect can be incorporated into an energy source by virtue of Maxwellian like demon, sorting reservoirs of opposite vacuum densities from the isotropy instead of the classic Maxwellian reservoirs of hot and cold atoms. 2 Time, Temperature and plasmons [snip] At extremely small distances - also tantamount to very high temperatures - the formulae are equivalent to the effect of the force of an electron-positron plasma in the space between the interacting ideal plates, according to the study. In this context, the mesons of the nuclear interaction theory become plasmons, which are collective excitations in the sea of electron-positron pairs in the vacuum.[/snip] Interesting that this paper indicates plasmons are induced from the vacuum by Casimir effect. Note I added time to issue 2 even though it is not mentioned in the snip because I think this relates again to Naudts paper regarding the effect upon hydrogen of Casimir geometry in his 05 paper on relativistic hydrogen as explanation for the hydrino my point is that lowering vacuum density is equivalent to what the near C twin observes but without the need for dx instead lowering the density below the isotropy instead of trying to compress it. IMHO analogous to employing displacement to float a boat in the ocean instead of the energy and tech required to compress water to several fathoms of pressure and since vacuum engineering is only now being born we do not yet even have the tech to compress it other than near C dx or deep gravity wells. We do however have the ability to employ skeletal cats and/or nano powders to create displacements/ segregations in vacuum density but we still await the first simple McGiver like demonstration that exploits this force to convince the world. Fran From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 12:43 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:RE: Plasma: Casimir and Yukawa mesons Fran-- Another good bit of theroy. Note all the authors from Sweden and Norway. They must know about the recent LENR events including the visit of McKubre to Norway. The rings in LENR's nose are taking effect. Bob Cook - Original Message - From: Roarty, Francis X To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:19 AM Subject: [Vo]:RE: Plasma: Casimir and Yukawa mesons The arix pdf Casimir forces in a Plasma: Possible Connections to Yukawa Potentials appears to be free http://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.1032v1.pdf
