RE: [Vo]: Dark Matter
So, you subscribe to the hollow earth theory? We need to get off this hollow rock and spread our DNA... Stewart https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaPtq8F2hUc Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson svjart.orionworks.com zazzle.com/orionworks
Re: [Vo]: Dark Matter
Not really hollow, probably a 6-D brane of vacuum at the core On Friday, February 20, 2015, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote: So, you subscribe to the hollow earth theory? We need to get off this hollow rock and spread our DNA... Stewart Hollow Earth, The Biggest Cover Up - Full Documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaPtq8F2hUc Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson svjart.orionworks.com zazzle.com/orionworks
Re: [Vo]:Explosion May Be Out of Control LENR
In reply to AlanG's message of Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:44:26 -0800: Hi Alan, Have you taken account of Hydrogen absorption by the rod? My final report on the pressure is now available at http://tinyurl.com/pdrd224 It includes corrections for thermal expansion and the van der Waals effect. Your comments and suggestions will be welcome as always. AlanG On 2/20/2015 8:28 AM, Bob Higgins wrote: Yes Bob, Thanks. The effect due to thermal expansion has been evaluated by Alan Goldwater to be a fraction of a percent. This pales in comparison to the ~40% effect of the 2-volume 2-temperature calculation, the ~12% effect of van der Walls vs. ideal gas, and the uncertainties in the actual mass of LiAlH4. But, it should be a part of the calculation. Another effect that could be at least as large is the mechanical expansion of the alumina tube under the forces of the high pressure. Thermal expansion increases the size of both the displacement rod and the tube, but mechanical strain would only increase the tube diameter, causing a bigger change in the dead volume. Bob Higgins Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Re: [Vo]:Explosion May Be Out of Control LENR
No. We discussed absorption by Ni and concluded that it would be minimal given the short duration of the test. I'd love to see evidence to the contrary, and our next test series will include a pressure sensor to watch for it. AlanG On 2/20/2015 4:01 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to AlanG's message of Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:44:26 -0800: Hi Alan, Have you taken account of Hydrogen absorption by the rod? My final report on the pressure is now available at http://tinyurl.com/pdrd224 It includes corrections for thermal expansion and the van der Waals effect. Your comments and suggestions will be welcome as always. AlanG On 2/20/2015 8:28 AM, Bob Higgins wrote: Yes Bob, Thanks. The effect due to thermal expansion has been evaluated by Alan Goldwater to be a fraction of a percent. This pales in comparison to the ~40% effect of the 2-volume 2-temperature calculation, the ~12% effect of van der Walls vs. ideal gas, and the uncertainties in the actual mass of LiAlH4. But, it should be a part of the calculation. Another effect that could be at least as large is the mechanical expansion of the alumina tube under the forces of the high pressure. Thermal expansion increases the size of both the displacement rod and the tube, but mechanical strain would only increase the tube diameter, causing a bigger change in the dead volume. Bob Higgins Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Re: [Vo]:Explosion May Be Out of Control LENR
Yes Bob, Thanks. The effect due to thermal expansion has been evaluated by Alan Goldwater to be a fraction of a percent. This pales in comparison to the ~40% effect of the 2-volume 2-temperature calculation, the ~12% effect of van der Walls vs. ideal gas, and the uncertainties in the actual mass of LiAlH4. But, it should be a part of the calculation. Another effect that could be at least as large is the mechanical expansion of the alumina tube under the forces of the high pressure. Thermal expansion increases the size of both the displacement rod and the tube, but mechanical strain would only increase the tube diameter, causing a bigger change in the dead volume. Bob Higgins On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote: Bob and Mark-- One potential minor correction to the volume should account for the increase (or decrease)in volume with temperature due to thermal expansion of the alumina tube and the added materials inside the tube. Bob - Original Message - *From:* Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com *Sent:* Thursday, February 19, 2015 2:08 PM *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Explosion May Be Out of Control LENR Mark, Alan Goldwater is working on a complete description of this that is being reviewed. One thing I recently added was the 2-volume, 2-temperature calculation, which, even with the ideal gas formula cuts the theoretical pressure to about 60%. I think Alan may be planning to discuss with you the 2-volume, 2-temperature calculation extended with the van der Walls formulation. So, Alan created a document walking through the volumes and mass calculations for the fuel and it is being reviewed at this time - it still is not ready with all of the effects. However, there is no reason not to give you what he is starting with to see if you come up with the same pressure estimates. The primary heated volume having the fuel was calculated to be 0.844ml, and the cooler dead volume was 0.611ml. The best estimates of the fuel (by Alan) was 0.565g of Vale T255 Ni + 0.105g of LiAlH4. The initial fuel volume displacement estimate was 0.177ml which reduces the internal volume of the heated area. The alumina tube ID was 3.81mm, and the OD of the rod taking up the dead space was 3.17mm. The OD was slightly under 6.35mm (1/4), leaving a wall thickness of about 1.25mm. The sintered Ni rod that remained was about 3.15mm diameter. The Li-Al film on the ID of the tube is estimated to be 25-100 microns in thickness. Aside from the dimensions, there is no way to estimate the proximity of the OD of the sintered Ni and the ID of the alumina. Bob
Re: [Vo]:Explosion May Be Out of Control LENR
Bob and Mark-- One potential minor correction to the volume should account for the increase (or decrease)in volume with temperature due to thermal expansion of the alumina tube and the added materials inside the tube. Bob - Original Message - From: Bob Higgins To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 2:08 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Explosion May Be Out of Control LENR Mark, Alan Goldwater is working on a complete description of this that is being reviewed. One thing I recently added was the 2-volume, 2-temperature calculation, which, even with the ideal gas formula cuts the theoretical pressure to about 60%. I think Alan may be planning to discuss with you the 2-volume, 2-temperature calculation extended with the van der Walls formulation. So, Alan created a document walking through the volumes and mass calculations for the fuel and it is being reviewed at this time - it still is not ready with all of the effects. However, there is no reason not to give you what he is starting with to see if you come up with the same pressure estimates. The primary heated volume having the fuel was calculated to be 0.844ml, and the cooler dead volume was 0.611ml. The best estimates of the fuel (by Alan) was 0.565g of Vale T255 Ni + 0.105g of LiAlH4. The initial fuel volume displacement estimate was 0.177ml which reduces the internal volume of the heated area. The alumina tube ID was 3.81mm, and the OD of the rod taking up the dead space was 3.17mm. The OD was slightly under 6.35mm (1/4), leaving a wall thickness of about 1.25mm. The sintered Ni rod that remained was about 3.15mm diameter. The Li-Al film on the ID of the tube is estimated to be 25-100 microns in thickness. Aside from the dimensions, there is no way to estimate the proximity of the OD of the sintered Ni and the ID of the alumina. Bob On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Mark Jurich jur...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Bob: Thank you so much for the rather concise/informative update involving the Dog Bone Explosion Run. I have a couple comments and questions to ask and I am hoping you know the answers to them or can direct me or this note to someone who might know. The “hoped” (or planned) weight % of Ni Powder in the fuel/charge was indeed 90%. My current estimate puts it at slightly above 84%. I realize that when you wrote 90% the implied error is +/- 10%, but I believe we are narrowing in to this value. Of course, this is based on the latest MFMP Information and is still subject to review. We are all anxiously awaiting the next update concerning the fuel/charge amount. Do you know what Alumina Tube Inside Diameter and Wall Thickness is? I would like to verify these values and attempt to determine whether the Hydrogen Gas Pressure (or what Hydrogen Gas Pressure) might cause the Alumina Tube to fracture. A link to the Alumina Tube Material Data Sheet would be extremely helpful. If you follow some of the links here at Vortex-L, my current estimate for the maximum pressure is 9641 psi +/- at least 10% error. Do you know what the Outside Diameter of the Sintered Ni Rod was? I know it may have been mentioned before. I am curious if there was any noticeable gap between the rod and the Alumina Wall. FYI: Here are the links to the fuel/charge materials used in this experiment, as far as I know: http://www.vale.com/EN/business/mining/nickel/NickelProducts/T255%20-%20Premium.pdf http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/199877 Thanks, Mark Jurich From: Bob Higgins Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:35 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Explosion May Be Out of Control LENR I received the broken shards of the alumina tube from the MFMP Parkhomov-like experiment from Ryan Hunt. The intent was to have analyzed the metal film on the inside of the alumina to see if it is Li-Al alloy and to try to re-assemble the pieces to form at least one full circumference of the tube. So far, piecing the tube together has been unsuccessful; however, I have found 2 pieces each having a large portion of the circumference - in one case 94 degrees of an arc and in another 106 degrees. In both cases, the ID of the alumina tube is completely covered with the metal film with no visual evidence at the boundaries of the metal tapering in thickness. Statistically, there is nothing to suggest that these pieces were centered on the bottom of the tube. Also, none of the shards show any transition from covered to uncovered with metal. Based on this, I surmise that the interior of the tube at 1057C had a complete circumferential ring of liquid Li-Al in a thin continuous layer. It appears that the liquid Li-Al wetted to the alumina, perhaps with the hydrogen and high temperature cleaning of the alumina surface. With the wetting, the surface tension of the liquid metal,
[Vo]:3 phase Voltage Compression and Expansion
Here we compare what is delivered when the series combinations of air core secondaries are all connected from a method delivering 60 degrees which vectorially sums to appear as an equilateral triangle producing near zero voltage in that combination; to that opposite circuit connection whereby the vector summation is made with two 120 degree angle separations in time. Here that theorized opposite result is actually in deviance to what is expected by the internal compressive voltage measurement made as the standard reference frame. I have made extensive mental inpections of the possibilities involved with taking three coils in series and applying the double negative solution. The double negative is simply a wiring compensation made by spatial reversal. In this situation we have three spiral sets of coils in series, each recording a magnetic flux change from its directly adjacent three phase primary source of vibration. When all of these connection methods on identically wound spirals across the three phase source are made from an identical wiring method they can be shown to be in relative symmetry whereby an average 4.4 volts/phase sums to a cancellation showing a third of a volt. By turning the middle seriesed coil in space over now the triple voltage summation reads 9.7 volts. This is about 10% more then what is predicted by the vector analysis assuming that the opposite of the standard reference frame will in fact appear as that result, which in this case it does not. It does not because it does not appear as the supplemental phase angle in time that adds to 180 degrees to the initial measurement being used as the standard reference frame. In this case the measurement employing 60 degree angles to determine the distance in time between them does so for the primary signals themselves mirroring a copied action on the secondaries. But when the measurement is made differently using the same 120 degree primary phase input it records the addition of the secondary to secondary mutual induction. The two methods of measurement give different results...These measurements are made from the top three poles of the 666 machine where each starting phase voltage measurement is made from a 50 ft spiral spool of Radio shack Megacable speaker wire. ~ 5 volt stator phase voltage input /delta phase. Three phase air core secondaries each record 4.3, 4.3 and 4.5 volts.https://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/16570768661/The phase angles are calculated by a triple voltage meter triangulation employing both single and double series measurements of voltage across the three element chain. The three voltage magnitudes are geometrically shown as drawn measurements using a drawing program derived from information of angles between vectors derived by applying the law of cos. The drawing program confirms the law of cos angle predictions as any three magnitudes can be formed into a triangle with the Atrix drawing program, and the resultant properties will show the inside phase angles, again corroborating what has already been derived using the law of cos. So here we see a drawing of this symmetry test of voltage compression athttps://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/15952171743/Triple seriesed voltage expansion from 3 phase symmetryhttps://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/16571697322/In order to PROOVE a time distortion process, first you have to demonstrate that your sources of 3 phase voltages divided in time three ways are in fact symmetrical with one another, and this requirement is secured when we show those sources placed in series to show the closest to zero voltage cancellation the system approaches. Then we can PREDICT what the voltages will be if no time distortion occurs when we reverse all the wiring connections in the chain. The prediction will be the supplemental angle adding to 180 degrees to the one found on the compression test. Here we find that the actual test of wire reversal produces a result showing phase angles expanded in time reference points in triplicate. A total of 30 degrees has been added to a 240 degree time referenced one. The simple vastly overlooked aspect in the building and discovery involved with three phase air core transformers is the fact that an EXTRA magnetic reaction occurs between those three phase secondaries themselves; where by an accidental or beneficial consequence of the arrangement becomes the fact now two and not one magnetic influences ensue one each secondary, first the main primary coupling one, now added by a secondary to secondary one, each making the cyclic voltage appearance of unobvious energy to appear further apart in time then their primary designations designed them to be. In the laws of primary designations, only two of three series segments could contribute the totality of their voltages on the triple series voltage output as referenced from the middle phase in the chain. Now more then twice is obtained as the
[Vo]:LENR is not pseudo-science, is pre-science
Dear Friends, It is here: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/02/a-tragic-and-expensive-confusion.html and it is true To be believed by all honest people, we have to add some certainties- experimental to what exists now. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]: Dark Matter
Another one for Stewie: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-dark-mass-extinctions-geologic-upheavals.html On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:41 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote: Scientists believe they might have detected dark matter for the first time – streaming from our very own Sun. If confirmed, it would be one of the biggest breakthroughs in the quest to better understand the universe. Read more: http://www.3news.co.nz/world/astronomers-claim-dark-matter-breakthrough-2014102211#ixzz3Gu8tGFYT Wait until they find out it is inflating into Dark Energy and causing our weather...
Re: [Vo]:Explosion May Be Out of Control LENR
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:08:57 -0700: Hi, Note that the alumina tube will expand somewhat with heating. Alan Goldwater is working on a complete description of this that is being reviewed. One thing I recently added was the 2-volume, 2-temperature calculation, which, even with the ideal gas formula cuts the theoretical pressure to about 60%. I think Alan may be planning to discuss with you the 2-volume, 2-temperature calculation extended with the van der Walls formulation. So, Alan created a document walking through the volumes and mass calculations for the fuel and it is being reviewed at this time - it still is not ready with all of the effects. However, there is no reason not to give you what he is starting with to see if you come up with the same pressure estimates. The primary heated volume having the fuel was calculated to be 0.844ml, and the cooler dead volume was 0.611ml. The best estimates of the fuel (by Alan) was 0.565g of Vale T255 Ni + 0.105g of LiAlH4. The initial fuel volume displacement estimate was 0.177ml which reduces the internal volume of the heated area. The alumina tube ID was 3.81mm, and the OD of the rod taking up the dead space was 3.17mm. The OD was slightly under 6.35mm (1/4), leaving a wall thickness of about 1.25mm. The sintered Ni rod that remained was about 3.15mm diameter. The Li-Al film on the ID of the tube is estimated to be 25-100 microns in thickness. Aside from the dimensions, there is no way to estimate the proximity of the OD of the sintered Ni and the ID of the alumina. Bob On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Mark Jurich jur...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Bob: Thank you so much for the rather concise/informative update involving the Dog Bone Explosion Run. I have a couple comments and questions to ask and I am hoping you know the answers to them or can direct me or this note to someone who might know. The hoped (or planned) weight % of Ni Powder in the fuel/charge was indeed 90%. My current estimate puts it at slightly above 84%. I realize that when you wrote 90% the implied error is +/- 10%, but I believe we are narrowing in to this value. Of course, this is based on the latest MFMP Information and is still subject to review. We are all anxiously awaiting the next update concerning the fuel/charge amount. Do you know what Alumina Tube Inside Diameter and Wall Thickness is? I would like to verify these values and attempt to determine whether the Hydrogen Gas Pressure (or what Hydrogen Gas Pressure) might cause the Alumina Tube to fracture. A link to the Alumina Tube Material Data Sheet would be extremely helpful. If you follow some of the links here at Vortex-L, my current estimate for the maximum pressure is 9641 psi +/- at least 10% error. Do you know what the Outside Diameter of the Sintered Ni Rod was? I know it may have been mentioned before. I am curious if there was any noticeable gap between the rod and the Alumina Wall. FYI: Here are the links to the fuel/charge materials used in this experiment, as far as I know: http://www.vale.com/EN/business/mining/nickel/NickelProducts/T255%20-%20Premium.pdf http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/199877 Thanks, Mark Jurich *From:* Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com *Sent:* Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:35 AM *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com *Subject:* [Vo]:Explosion May Be Out of Control LENR I received the broken shards of the alumina tube from the MFMP Parkhomov-like experiment from Ryan Hunt. The intent was to have analyzed the metal film on the inside of the alumina to see if it is Li-Al alloy and to try to re-assemble the pieces to form at least one full circumference of the tube. So far, piecing the tube together has been unsuccessful; however, I have found 2 pieces each having a large portion of the circumference - in one case 94 degrees of an arc and in another 106 degrees. In both cases, the ID of the alumina tube is completely covered with the metal film with no visual evidence at the boundaries of the metal tapering in thickness. Statistically, there is nothing to suggest that these pieces were centered on the bottom of the tube. Also, none of the shards show any transition from covered to uncovered with metal. Based on this, I surmise that the interior of the tube at 1057C had a complete circumferential ring of liquid Li-Al in a thin continuous layer. It appears that the liquid Li-Al wetted to the alumina, perhaps with the hydrogen and high temperature cleaning of the alumina surface. With the wetting, the surface tension of the liquid metal, and the high interior pressure, I believe the liquid metal was forced to cover the inner circumference of the tube while it was liquid. The chemical effect of the Li on the alumina may also have been instrumental in the wetting of the metal solution to the ceramic. There is no supporting evidence for a gravity fed river of
Re: [Vo]:Explosion May Be Out of Control LENR
My final report on the pressure is now available at http://tinyurl.com/pdrd224 It includes corrections for thermal expansion and the van der Waals effect. Your comments and suggestions will be welcome as always. AlanG On 2/20/2015 8:28 AM, Bob Higgins wrote: Yes Bob, Thanks. The effect due to thermal expansion has been evaluated by Alan Goldwater to be a fraction of a percent. This pales in comparison to the ~40% effect of the 2-volume 2-temperature calculation, the ~12% effect of van der Walls vs. ideal gas, and the uncertainties in the actual mass of LiAlH4. But, it should be a part of the calculation. Another effect that could be at least as large is the mechanical expansion of the alumina tube under the forces of the high pressure. Thermal expansion increases the size of both the displacement rod and the tube, but mechanical strain would only increase the tube diameter, causing a bigger change in the dead volume. Bob Higgins
Re: [Vo]: Dark Matter
Let's assume dark matter is quantum vacuum than an increase in vacuum density will make it hard for life to exist, which fits the weak Anthropic principle. That implies we exist right now because the local vacuum levels allow it, which can/will change over time. We need to get off this hollow rock and spread our DNA... Stewart On Friday, February 20, 2015, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: Another one for Stewie: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-dark-mass-extinctions-geologic-upheavals.html On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:41 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: Scientists believe they might have detected dark matter for the first time – streaming from our very own Sun. If confirmed, it would be one of the biggest breakthroughs in the quest to better understand the universe. Read more: http://www.3news.co.nz/world/astronomers-claim-dark-matter-breakthrough-2014102211#ixzz3Gu8tGFYT Wait until they find out it is inflating into Dark Energy and causing our weather...
