The problem I have with this analysis is that in the Lugano reaction, whose
fuel/ash analyses are the basis of the hypothesis, the Ni seemed to have
been largely converted to 62Ni and the Li converted almost completely to
6Li; yet in the experiment, the excess heat showed no signs of abatement.
See:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/18/business/energy-environment/coal-miners-struggle-to-survive-in-an-industry-battered-by-layoffs-and-bankruptcy.html
This is in response to cheap natural gas and the increase in wind and solar
power. This will happen to all conventional and alternative energy
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
It appeared that the reaction heat continued even though the fuel had been
converted to 6Li and 62Ni. How is this explained in your theory?
Some thoughts here:
- It's an open question as to whether and how much
In thinking about the large iron oxide particles in the Lugano fuel and
what role they may have played, it struck me that they could possibly have
created a small thermite reaction (see Wikipedia). The thermite reaction
is between the Fe2O3 particle and the liquid aluminum. In this thermite
Dear Friends
It is this
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/07/ferocious-lenr-editorial-anorexic-cow.html
for today.
A fine weekend to you all!
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
The paper makes no mention of neutrons. There should be as many neutrons
produced as protons (10^13), but there is no record of neutrons. And after
all these years of research, Holmild is not dead yet. With 10^13 neutrons
produced per shot, this guy should have died long ago, There is not
mention
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The paper makes no mention of neutrons.
I think that might be one of the obvious emissions of which Jones spoke.
Another nail in hot fusion’s coffin—in the traditional magnetic confined
version at least. The goose will stop laying golden eggs pretty quick now
IMHO.
Bob Cook
From: Terry Blanton
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 10:00 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Land of Fire and Ice
Sveinn did a radio interview
and following a request by Ecco, a follower, Sveinbjörn, made a translation
for the community - it is here:
https://goo.gl/RT71Sa
Sveinbjörn Höskuldsson Q: What is cold fusion?
A: Conventional release of hydrogen power, such as in hydrogen powered cars
is a
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 17 Jul 2015 22:39:48 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
In that detection method, Lithium ions cannot remain without electrons
through an acid bath.
Take another look at the binding energy of the new particle. (See the last
column in the table at the bottom of the pdf
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Sat, 18 Jul 2015 08:34:52 -0600:
Hi,
The problem I have with this analysis is that in the Lugano reaction, whose
fuel/ash analyses are the basis of the hypothesis, the Ni seemed to have
been largely converted to 62Ni and the Li converted almost completely to
I wrote:
If there's neutron stripping along the lines of 7Li → 6Li, giving rise to
58Ni → ... → 62Ni, this process might not be the only neutron stripping one
going on, and perhaps not even the primary one.
There is a further problem with explaining the excess heat in the Lugano test
as
From: Terry Blanton
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8mt4mJOTGvBU3dMU3Q3UWp6czg/view?usp=sharing
This is an enhancement of a string of similar papers – many of which we have
talked about before … getting more impressive all the while, and now certain
details are coming out which may have
This looks like a free precursor paper:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8mt4mJOTGvBU3dMU3Q3UWp6czg/view?usp=sharing
I would expect that the laser fusion method per the Leif Holmild reaction
should produce nuclear radiation because of the 3 and 14MeV protons it
produces. Holmild does not mention this in his paper. The Holmild reaction
is much like what Joe Papp produced to drive his pistons. This type of
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:58:59 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:57:12 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
There is very little Li7 in the ash, so the high masses based on Li7 might be
below the detection threshold.
The values for Li
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 18 Jul 2015 20:15:31 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
What Is not clear in common sense terms... if the fuel has more lithium than
the ash, why does the fuel need to wait to be loaded into the reactor for the
reaction to take hold. placing some nickel powder into
From the interview it sure sounds like the researchers did not see any
significant gamma radiation. This seems unlikely given 14 MEV protons.
Another direct question would be what neutron detection instrument they used.
It seems given the technology associated with what the claim to have
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sun, 19 Jul 2015 08:25:08 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
resistant to temperatures up to half a million degrees Kelvin. An acid bath is
just going to wash them nice and clean, if there are any left. ;)
Actually I may be wrong about this. It may be possible for the
If a lithium atom were to replace 1-3 electrons with hydrinohydrides as a
stable molecule, this surely would show up in the SIMS of the fuel in the
Lugano report. SIMS measures mass and you would see a spectrum of
6Li+(1,2,3) and 7Li+(1,2,3), or m/z=8,9,10 should show up and they don't.
A
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Another nail in hot fusion’s coffin—in the traditional magnetic
confined version at least. The goose will stop laying golden eggs pretty
quick now IMHO.
Never under estimate the power of political inertia.
What Is not clear in common sense terms... if the fuel has more lithium
than the ash, why does the fuel need to wait to be loaded into the reactor
for the reaction to take hold. placing some nickel powder into lithium
should get te reaction going if reaction is all up to hydrinos.
On Sat, Jul 18,
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:57:12 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
There is very little Li7 in the ash, so the high masses based on Li7 might be
below the detection threshold.
The values for Li + 3 hydrinos can indeed be ruled out as you suggest.
That leaves Li6 + 1 or Li6 + 2 with
23 matches
Mail list logo
