Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway

2017-02-10 Thread Axil Axil
When the lattice melts or vaporizes, the NAE stored in that portion of the lattice would according to Ed Storms theory would be removed from heat production, so the meltdown should be self limiting and terminat. In other words, when a proportion of the NAE is removed, then the LENR reaction should

Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway

2017-02-10 Thread Jed Rothwell
Axil Axil wrote: Why Peter Gluck is correct about in situ NAE production and Ed Storms is > wrong. The LENR reaction has produced meltdown conditions where all lattice > based NAE storage was destroyed and yet the LENR reactor continued to melt > through lab tables and

Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway

2017-02-10 Thread Axil Axil
Why Peter Gluck is correct about in situ NAE production and Ed Storms is wrong. The LENR reaction has produced meltdown conditions where all lattice based NAE storage was destroyed and yet the LENR reactor continued to melt through lab tables and concrete floors. ERGO, the LENR reaction can exist

[Vo]:LENR praxeology. LENR "in situ"

2017-02-10 Thread Peter Gluck
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-10-2017-lenr-keywords-for-today.html -peter Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway

2017-02-10 Thread Axil Axil
If LENR is a result of magnetic interaction with the nucleus, then the LENR reaction should behave very much like the way that the nuclear magnetic resonance reaction (NMR) behaves. First, the atoms with zero net nuclear spin should be the atoms that are most likely to allow magnetic energy

Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway

2017-02-10 Thread David Roberson
Bob, The velocity of sound within metals is quite high at 4900 meters per second in a thin rod of nickel. Travel time to pass, for instance 10 nanometers, would be approximately 2 picoseconds. That would suggest that the period of a half resonator structure could be around 4 picoseconds which

Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway

2017-02-10 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:41 PM, wrote: > Jones – > > > > Good questions and fair to midland conclusions. > http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/fair-to-middling.html Interesting; but, then again, I have always considered myself a cunning linguist. ;) Terry

Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway

2017-02-10 Thread Jones Beene
Bob Higgins wrote: The problem with the phonon is that its wavelength is extremely short. The attenuation coefficient for waves, in general, is typically quoted in dB/wavelength; and nature abhors a too small value for such a number. Come to think of it, isn't it arguable that wavelength

[Vo]:Time anomalies and LENR [crystals, decay and plasma oh my!]

2017-02-10 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Hi Russ, I changed to a new thread but wanted to include your Time Crystal observations because they share a temporal basis with anomalous radioactive decay and the strange IR light observed in experiments by Black Light and others. I was motivated by other threads where arguments are raised

Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway

2017-02-10 Thread Brian Ahern
DavidMy e-mail is: ahern_br...@msn.com From: David Roberson Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 9:01 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defining the active particle of an LENR runaway Brian, The Manelas device is an interesting