In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Tue, 14 Apr 2020 01:18:59 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Te best atomic clocks are sensitive to 10cm difference in altitude.
>
>But there is one open point: Is only the Rb/Cs crystal oscillating a bit
>slower/faster or is the electronics measuring slower/faster - or
Te best atomic clocks are sensitive to 10cm difference in altitude.
But there is one open point: Is only the Rb/Cs crystal oscillating a bit
slower/faster or is the electronics measuring slower/faster - or both?
This, may be, could be tested by changing the crystal only.
Of course Leibniz is
Bob,
Time increments maybe arbitrary but I don't hold the belief that the
passage of time is just an illusion between each increment or event. This
is a perennial metaphysical question which I don't want to get into. For
example Leibniz did not think time flowed. He said time was an ordering of
Harry—
If SO(4) physics is valid, the gravitational attraction between the earth and
the pendulum may be blocked by appropriate shields and result in a different
illusion of the passage of time relative to other measurements of arbitrary
time increments—like the rotation of the earth due to
4 matches
Mail list logo
