Re: [Vo]:Outreach for discussion on Znidarsic-Smith genuine UFO reverse engineering using causal reasoning
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Kevin O'Malley wrote: If you really want to get down to the "natural forces" behind flying saucers, just read ONE book: Renato Vesco's "Intercept UFO". https://www.amazon.com/Intercept-UFO-Renato-Vesco/dp/B0006WI572 Normally I avoid UFO stuff, but a really kick-ass book, revealing some actual secrets (but not the physics/devices,) is: American Cosmic DW Pasulka https://www.amazon.com/American-Cosmic-UFOs-Religion-Technology/dp/019069288X Still no paperback. I actually bought the hardcover. Twice! Note that Tyler D. is "Tyler Durden" ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) William J. Beatyhttp://staff.washington.edu/wbeaty/ beaty, chem washington edu Research Engineer billb, amasci com UW Chem Dept, Bagley Hall RM74 x3-6195 Box 351700, Seattle, WA 98195-1700
Re: [Vo]:photons
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Sun, 10 Oct 2021 13:58:12 -0600: Hi Bob, [snip] >I believe photons to be corpuscles having more than one cycle (sort of like >a gaussian envelope) but finite in size. The envelope is a soliton >solution supported by the nonlinearity of the aether; which is different >from a linear EM excitation of the aether. Each photon contains a fixed >energy as a corpuscle. You cannot ascribe an energy/cycle because the >waveform is not sine. Then what are frequency/wavelength related to in such an entity? >Also, within the nonlinearity of the photon >excitation of the aether, the velocity is different due to the >nonlinearity. Photons must have a fixed size, commensurate with the >electron orbital that can absorb it. Try assuming that absorption depends on frequency not size. Take the swing example. A push at the right moment leads to large oscillations, even though the length of the "push" is much smaller than the amplitude of the oscillation. IOW frequency (timing), not size, determines energy transfer. >Photons propagate completely >differently than normal linearly excited EM waves. So where is the frequency dividing line? IOW If radio waves are EM waves, and light is photons, then at what frequency does that change over from EM waves to photons occur? > >Photons don't arise from Maxwell's equations because Maxwell's equations >are a linear description of space. Maxwell believed there IS an aether and >his equations reflect this. Even though the aether was not measured, they >continued to use Maxwell's equations for normal EM excitation because they >worked (proving there is an aether). Those that believe there is no aether >cannot understand the possibility of a soliton solution for a photon. >Soliton solutions require a nonlinear medium. From their perspective, if >space is empty, how can "nothing" be nonlinear? From my perspective, the >existence of photons provides another proof that there is an aether and it >is nonlinear. ...only if photons are indeed Solitons. [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk
Re: [Vo]:photons
I believe photons to be corpuscles having more than one cycle (sort of like a gaussian envelope) but finite in size. The envelope is a soliton solution supported by the nonlinearity of the aether; which is different from a linear EM excitation of the aether. Each photon contains a fixed energy as a corpuscle. You cannot ascribe an energy/cycle because the waveform is not sine. Also, within the nonlinearity of the photon excitation of the aether, the velocity is different due to the nonlinearity. Photons must have a fixed size, commensurate with the electron orbital that can absorb it. Photons propagate completely differently than normal linearly excited EM waves. Photons don't arise from Maxwell's equations because Maxwell's equations are a linear description of space. Maxwell believed there IS an aether and his equations reflect this. Even though the aether was not measured, they continued to use Maxwell's equations for normal EM excitation because they worked (proving there is an aether). Those that believe there is no aether cannot understand the possibility of a soliton solution for a photon. Soliton solutions require a nonlinear medium. From their perspective, if space is empty, how can "nothing" be nonlinear? From my perspective, the existence of photons provides another proof that there is an aether and it is nonlinear. Bob Higgins On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 1:00 PM Robin wrote: > Hi, > > Photons have a cycle time(T) = 1/frequency. > Planks constant has the dimension of energy x time. > So the energy of single cycle photon would be h/T = h x frequency, which > is the formula for photon energy. > What does this mean? > It means that either the photon energy formula only describes the minimal > energy of a photon, or that all photons only > comprise a single cycle. > If multi-cycle photons also exist, then their energy would be a multiple > of the base photon energy. > > Comments? > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > >
[Vo]:photons
Hi, Photons have a cycle time(T) = 1/frequency. Planks constant has the dimension of energy x time. So the energy of single cycle photon would be h/T = h x frequency, which is the formula for photon energy. What does this mean? It means that either the photon energy formula only describes the minimal energy of a photon, or that all photons only comprise a single cycle. If multi-cycle photons also exist, then their energy would be a multiple of the base photon energy. Comments? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk
[Vo]:Bosenova of electron clusters
Some unrelated independent third party research might serve to validate Rossi's reaction theory positing high energy electron production coming from a Bosenova of what Rossi calls electron clusters embedded in his plasma. We know these clusters to actually be polariton condensates. In the video below, Sveinn Ólafsson is shining a laser spot onto some Ultra dense hydrogen (UDH) and seeing some interference patterns that he cannot account for. https://youtu.be/sZHVG5NYLyQ?t=372 In the article about polaritons lasers, the same interference patterns are seen in the article as follows: https://phys.org/news/2019-05-scientists-polariton-nano-laser-room-temperature.html https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/800a/2019/4-scientistsat.jpg also from the underlying source document https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aau9338 https://www.science.org/cms/10.1126/sciadv.aau9338/asset/633596a6-17bf-4994-8948-c14a073e0277/assets/graphic/aau9338-f3.jpeg What Sveinn is doing is producing what we call an EVO (aka polariton condensate) from an UDH seed when Sveinn excites the UDH with the laser spot. Sveinn also reports the appearance of high energy particles coming from the area where the interference pattern appears corresponding with the laser spot. We see at 8:31 in the video, that high energy particles are produced that we know from Rossi's paper are electrons. These electrons have an energy of 1.5 MeV. This same energy was the maximum energy that we saw in the radiation burst that came from the MFMP LENR experiment upon activation of heat production. That gamma ray burst was called the "signal" and took the form of breaking radiation whose top energy was 1.5 MeV from a Bosenova of an electron cluster. In addition, Sveinn also sees material degradation at the spot of high energy particle production on the substrate.
