RE: [Vo]: MIB persuasions now vladimir b ginzburg
Hi Esa, hi so what do you lot think of vladimir b ginzburg? seems to be slightly touched in the head about vortices! Interesting comment to be made on a list called vortex-l. I have corresponded with him and have one of his books. Unlike my work, which is completely dimension based and derives straight from the empirical constants, Ginzburg tries to work within the SM and Relativity theories. He is actually quite scholarly and gives a properly referenced history of vortex structures in ancient and modern physics theories. He then goes on to show his own work with regard to modern physics. Far from being touched in the head, if anybody on this list is truly interested in vortices with regard to physics, they will want to read his book Prime Elements of Ordinary Matter, Dark Matter Dark Energy. Dave
Re: [Vo]: MIB persuasions now vladimir b ginzburg
i didnt mean touched in the head as in whacked out - i just thought maybe there'd be some people who have studied what he has published regards vortex theories and spirals, and then wouldve, you know, ended that mib conversation. he seemed to be a nice person :) and i loved that properly referenced history-list that he had in one of his books, obviously my own interest in that wouldve been to see lots on walter russell and viktor schauberger, but the rest of the list seemed to be quite fun. shame again that helicola.com is offline. On 14/03/07, David Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Esa, hi so what do you lot think of vladimir b ginzburg? seems to be slightly touched in the head about vortices! Interesting comment to be made on a list called vortex-l. I have corresponded with him and have one of his books. Unlike my work, which is completely dimension based and derives straight from the empirical constants, Ginzburg tries to work within the SM and Relativity theories. He is actually quite scholarly and gives a properly referenced history of vortex structures in ancient and modern physics theories. He then goes on to show his own work with regard to modern physics. Far from being touched in the head, if anybody on this list is truly interested in vortices with regard to physics, they will want to read his book Prime Elements of Ordinary Matter, Dark Matter Dark Energy. Dave
Re: [Vo]: MIB persuasions now vladimir b ginzburg
back onlist: On 14/03/07, David Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and i loved that properly referenced history-list that he had in one of his books, obviously my own interest in that wouldve been to see lots on walter russell and viktor schauberger, but the rest of the list seemed to be quite fun. Yes, although Ginzburg mentioned Schauberger in glowing terms, he didn't go into much detail. This is probably because Viktor Schauberger didn't explain his theory mathematically, but only practically. Ginzburg's work is mathematical in nature. i did try to give ginzburg some stuff on walter schauberger (who took great pains to take viktor's realizations back into mathematics and physics and, well, science), lets see what happens. after all, walter schauberger did publish quite a bit on the hyperbolic open-path geometry that seemed to mesh in with everything else. should be interesting to see how the two walters coincide, walter russell and schauberge.r shame again that helicola.com is offline. I wonder what the problem is? Everything seemed fine last fall when we were emailing back and forth. Maybe he got a government contract? one idea comes to mind, maybe the server has just xpired.
Re: [Vo]: MIB persuasions now vladimir b ginzburg
hi so what do you lot think of vladimir b ginzburg? seems to be slightly touched in the head about vortices! its a shame his website helicola.com is offline - but he has published 3 books, 3 of which are on amazon. seems fun, he even has a thing called the 3 dimensional spiral super-string theory! seems like a fun person! On 14/03/07, nothing of worth was said by two or twenty people fighting amongst themselves
