RE: [Vo]:Storms comments on Rossi

2011-03-04 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 06:37 PM 3/3/2011, you wrote: BTW - If you haven't seen it, here is the preliminary WIPO rejection notice of most of the claims of the Rossi patent http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/36/Rossi-Patent-Application-WO-2009-125444-PrelimReport.pdf Just not surprising at all. My

Re: [Vo]:Storms comments on Rossi

2011-03-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Just not surprising at all. My hypothesis would be that Rossi expected this, and filed the patent only to create publicity. Bad publicity. Frankly, it makes him look stupid. I cannot think of any reason why he would want to do that. The disclosures in the patent

[Vo]:Storms comments on Rossi

2011-03-03 Thread Jed Rothwell
Here is a message Ed sent to Abd and me, reprinted with permission -- This debate of whether to believe Rossi ignores two very important facts. We now know that chemically assisted nuclear reactions are possible, thanks to the CF work. This not like the claims for over unity based on odd

RE: [Vo]:Storms comments on Rossi

2011-03-03 Thread Jones Beene
BTW - If you haven't seen it, here is the preliminary WIPO rejection notice of most of the claims of the Rossi patent http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/36/Rossi-Patent-Application-WO-20 09-125444-PrelimReport.pdf