RE: E Fields From Spinning Electromagnets Magnets

2005-01-22 Thread Keith Nagel
Hi Fred.

I googled and still disagree with the author, a self exciting
homopolar generator can contain no permanent magnet
material and yet when spun, will generate a current.
The authors explanation that a spinning electromagnet
cannot generate the E field seems just plain wrong
to me based on experimental evidence. 

K.

-Original Message-
From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 7:37 PM
To: Keith Nagel; vortex-l
Subject: RE: E Fields From Spinning Electromagnets  Magnets



Keith Nagel wrote:

 Hey Fred,

 I'm curious how they explain the functioning of the self exciting
 homopolar generator, N. Tesla (1891). Where are the translating
 current loops?

Googling Guala-Valverde brings up a lot of related stuff, Keith.

Eddys?

Frederick

 K.

 -Original Message-
 From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 6:07 PM
 To: vortex-l
 Subject: Re: E Fields From Spinning Electromagnets  Magnets


 What if the electromagnet is wound with high turn pitch. It should
translate wrt your frame like
 the stripes on a rotating barber pole.  :-)



http://www.maxwellsociety.net/PhysicsCorner/CurrentLoopPolarization/ElectroA
ndPermanentMagnets.html

 It has been quantitatively demonstrated that the net charge density is
not everywhere zero when the current loop of Sect. 1
 translates along a line in its plane. Indeed a simple proof qualitatively
indicates that uncharged current loops are electrically
 polarized when they translate. At any given moment the translating loop
has an excess of positive or negative charge on one side,
 and an excess of negative or positive charge on the other. In brief, the
translating loop has an electric dipole moment (as well as
 a magnetic moment), and consequently there is a nonzero electric field.
 This effect is only present when the loop translates. It is not present
when the loop merely spins.
 Frederick

 More:

http://www.maxwellsociety.net/PhysicsCorner/Electrodynamics/GualaValverde%20
Explanation.html






Re: E Fields From Spinning Electromagnets Magnets

2005-01-21 Thread Frederick Sparber



I Googled it before going to the trouble of trying it. 

OTOH, a large needle on a foot of thread swung past a stationary vertical "Cow Magnet" 
goes into rotational oscillation above the tip of the CM.

http://www.maxwellsociety.net/PhysicsCorner/CurrentLoopPolarization/ElectroAndPermanentMagnets.html

"The results obtained by Guala-Valverde and others suggest a sort of rotational relativity. That is, it seems that the emf across the load depends only upon the motion of magnet and load relative to each other. (Obviously there is a nonzero emf when the magnet is at rest and the load rotates.)
The problem with this conclusion is that Maxwell’s equations (like Newton’s laws) apply only in inertial frames of reference. The contention of this article is that the experimental results are consistent with the electric polarization of translating current loops. In brief, spinning permanent magnets have spin-induced electric fields with radial components. Such radial electric fields can produce emfs across resting loads, quite as the magnetic forces produce emfs when the load moves through the B field of a resting magnet.
It is worth noting another explanation suggested for the zero emf observed when magnet and load rotate in tandem. It has been theorized that the spinning magnet "drags" its B field along, so that the (also moving) load is not cutting across any B field lines. However, the emf is nonzero when the load spins within an enclosing electromagnet, regardless of whether the electromagnet spins or remains at rest. And the emf is zero when the load is at rest and the electromagnet spins! It seems somewhat ad hoc to suppose that a spinning permanent magnet drags its magnetic field along, whereas a spinning electromagnet does not."
Frederick

Re: E Fields From Spinning Electromagnets Magnets

2005-01-21 Thread Frederick Sparber



What if the electromagnet is wound with high turn pitch. It should translate wrt your frame like
the stripes on a rotating "barber pole". :-)


http://www.maxwellsociety.net/PhysicsCorner/CurrentLoopPolarization/ElectroAndPermanentMagnets.html


"It has been quantitatively demonstrated that the net charge density is not everywhere zero when the current loop of Sect. 1 translates along a line in its plane. Indeed a simple proof qualitatively indicates that uncharged current loops are electrically polarized when they translate. At any given moment the translating loop has an excess of positive or negative charge on one "side," and an excess of negative or positive charge on the other. In brief, the translating loop has an electric dipole moment (as well as a magnetic moment), and consequently there is a nonzero electric field."
"This effect is only present when the loop translates. It is not present when the loop merely spins."
Frederick

More:
http://www.maxwellsociety.net/PhysicsCorner/Electrodynamics/GualaValverde%20Explanation.html

Re: E Fields From Spinning Electromagnets Magnets

2005-01-21 Thread Harry Veeder
Frederick Sparber at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 What if the electromagnet is wound with high turn pitch. It should translate
 wrt your frame like
 the stripes on a rotating barber pole.  :-)



Would such a rotating electromagnet self-accelerate along the axis of
rotation if its axis of rotation could be maintained?

Harry



Re: E Fields From Spinning Electromagnets Magnets

2005-01-21 Thread Frederick Sparber
Harry Veeder wrote:

 Frederick Sparber at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
  What if the electromagnet is wound with high turn pitch. It should
translate
  wrt your frame like
  the stripes on a rotating barber pole.  :-)



 Would such a rotating electromagnet self-accelerate along the axis of
 rotation if its axis of rotation could be maintained?

You might have trouble keeping it on the ground.   :-)

BTW, there should be another field due to v^2/r acceleration.  Gravity?

Frederick

 Harry





RE: E Fields From Spinning Electromagnets Magnets

2005-01-21 Thread Frederick Sparber

Keith Nagel wrote:

 Hey Fred,

 I'm curious how they explain the functioning of the self exciting
 homopolar generator, N. Tesla (1891). Where are the translating
 current loops?

Googling Guala-Valverde brings up a lot of related stuff, Keith.

Eddys?

Frederick

 K.

 -Original Message-
 From: Frederick Sparber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 6:07 PM
 To: vortex-l
 Subject: Re: E Fields From Spinning Electromagnets  Magnets


 What if the electromagnet is wound with high turn pitch. It should
translate wrt your frame like
 the stripes on a rotating barber pole.  :-)



http://www.maxwellsociety.net/PhysicsCorner/CurrentLoopPolarization/ElectroA
ndPermanentMagnets.html

 It has been quantitatively demonstrated that the net charge density is
not everywhere zero when the current loop of Sect. 1
 translates along a line in its plane. Indeed a simple proof qualitatively
indicates that uncharged current loops are electrically
 polarized when they translate. At any given moment the translating loop
has an excess of positive or negative charge on one side,
 and an excess of negative or positive charge on the other. In brief, the
translating loop has an electric dipole moment (as well as
 a magnetic moment), and consequently there is a nonzero electric field.
 This effect is only present when the loop translates. It is not present
when the loop merely spins.
 Frederick

 More:

http://www.maxwellsociety.net/PhysicsCorner/Electrodynamics/GualaValverde%20
Explanation.html





Re: E Fields From Spinning Electromagnets Magnets

2005-01-21 Thread Harry Veeder
Frederick Sparber at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Harry Veeder wrote:
 
 Frederick Sparber at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 What if the electromagnet is wound with high turn pitch. It should
 translate
 wrt your frame like
 the stripes on a rotating barber pole.  :-)
 
 
 
 Would such a rotating electromagnet self-accelerate along the axis of
 rotation if its axis of rotation could be maintained?
 
 You might have trouble keeping it on the ground.   :-)
 
 BTW, there should be another field due to v^2/r acceleration.

Is 'r' the radius of the barber pole?


 Gravity?

Not sure what you mean.


Harry