Re: [Vo]:Santilli "neutrons"

[Che]

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Jones Beene  wrote:

> http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/06/05/
> 1008093/0/en/Thunder-Energies-Receives-Down-Payment-on-
> Equipment-Producing-a-Directional-Neutron-Flux-and-
> Predicts-Profitability-for-its-Construction.html
>

'Directional neutron flux'..? Sounds like someone wants a ray gun weapon.

Re: [Vo]:Santilli "neutrons"

[Jones Beene]

There are many reasons to be skeptical of Santilli. He does use a 
variety of neutron detection devices, however. Whatever he is making 
looks like neutrons.


This press release makes one think that he could have something valid 
this time.


http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/06/05/1008093/0/en/Thunder-Energies-Receives-Down-Payment-on-Equipment-Producing-a-Directional-Neutron-Flux-and-Predicts-Profitability-for-its-Construction.html

... but it just a press release for a device not yet in service, but it 
seems closer to reality than anything he has done before.



Bob Higgins wrote:
The trouble with these type of experiments is that it is extremely 
difficult to prove that electronic measurement of neutrons is valid in 
the presence of the "mini-EMP" arc pulses.  A much better test for 
neutrons would be to use the BubbleTech (non-electronic) neutron 
detectors and show bubbles being produced at a significant rate 
compared to control periods with the same detectors.


 Jones Beene wrote:

Of interest:

A video which purports to show neutrons being created from arcing
through hydrogen gas

This seems to fit into the concept of dense hydrogen masquerading
as a virtual neutron...


https://www.globenewswire.com/Tracker?data=p5l_Ag1pSky4LmG9KpKRbX3ayWu0Cnp9SmLl7BlillCm_qJcvnonV1XYOS-S_NGOkH73UUat9mh69JyoXUXvFk1rTLypqP_zKJl8zQwi3BohM6RimKFx8m8CPU97XW4RpbZ4Bg1oJVNzoQVA9aOnkkpGOoFNRB1A7SXNnr_lHP0=