Hello group,
Here's a video that will generate MUCH discussion, filmed by Steven
Krivit during his visit in Bologna on June 14th:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrTz5Bq6dsA
Cheers,
S.A.
Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Here's a video that will generate MUCH discussion, filmed by Steven
Krivit during his visit in Bologna on June 14th:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrTz5Bq6dsA
I do not see anything controversial about it. He almost forgot to
multiply the mass of water times 7 kg,
For such a routine-routine calculation he supposedly made hundreds of...he
seems a bit slow. Or too pedagogical? And the output/input ratio( 6.7) has
to be divided with at least 3 if we speak about the value of energy- 1kW
electric = 3 kW thermal energy.
The Defkalion brochure speaks about
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
And the output/input ratio( 6.7) has to be divided with at least 3 if we
speak about the value of energy- 1kW electric = 3 kW thermal energy.
Considering the temperature of only 100C of the ecat output, the value of
Peter Gluck wrote:
For such a routine-routine calculation he supposedly made hundreds
of...he seems a bit slow. Or too pedagogical?
I have done that calculation many times, but if I were doing it on a
blackboard for a video audience in Japanese I doubt I would be as smooth
as Rossi was.
My only complaint it is that Rossi needs glasses. He finds it
difficult to read his own notes.
THe ratio HAS to be made much higher. The story has started from 200:1
according to Focardi.
Peter
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter Gluck wrote:
For such a routine-routine calculation he supposedly made hundreds of...he
seems a bit slow. Or
It is, but it is either explosive or the power is too slow, like with
the experiments that you mention of Focardi.
Peter Gluck wrote:
THe ratio HAS to be made much higher. The story has started from 200:1
according to Focardi.
The ratio has been made infinite in some cases. Rossi has run the cells
with no power input. As I am sure you know he says this is dangerous.
Assuming that is true, it still means
Excuse me I don't get exactly what you are saying.\
It seems there are 2 problems;
a) we don't know exactly how the system has to be controlled to give maxim
performance i.e. intensity and efficiency (output/input0;
b) Rossi is not mastering perfectly the same parameters - he has made scale
down
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 2:34 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:[Video] Andrea Rossi Crunches the Numbers for His
Energy Catalyzer (June 14th)
Excuse me I don't get exactly what you are saying.\
It seems there are 2 problems;
a) we don't know exactly how the system
What fluid would you suggest?
The best heat transfer liquid is water, any organic heat transfer liquid
(Defkalion speak about glycol but this has to be a glycol of higher moleculr
weight) is dangerous- comustible toxic and is degrading and fouling the very
hot surfaces as in this case.I have worked long years with Diphyl, not
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
What fluid would you suggest?
Jones suggests therminol which is used in solar power applications;
but, as Peter points out about glycol, there are also disadvantages.
The system would have to be securely closed.
T
a mixture of ground coffee and water should do the trick. ;-)
Harry
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc:
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 5:10:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[Video] Andrea Rossi Crunches the Numbers for His Energy
Joshua Cude,
Are you conceding that the Rossi device produces some anomalous excess
heat -- in a fully reproducible setup, capable of explosions, that
would imply important, accessible new physics...
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com wrote:
Joshua Cude,
Are you conceding that the Rossi device produces some anomalous excess
heat -- in a fully reproducible setup, capable of explosions, that
would imply important, accessible new physics...
I make no definite
17 matches
Mail list logo
