In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:52:18 -0500:
Hi,
BTW for a Hydrino based explanation, consider the possibility that 4 negatively
charged Hydrinohydride ions displace the electrons of a Lithium atom and arrange
themselves in a tight tetrahedron with Li3+ at its core. This
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:52:18 -0500:
Hi,
The sample contained many trillions of atoms. The chances of such a result
occurring accidentally are essentially non-existent. There had to be an
underlying mechanism.
I suggest you look for an SPP explanation for neutron
Transmutation being 1 in 10^6 is good enough for me.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
.
This doesn't explain why the reaction stopped at 62Ni.
The one particle is one in a million. The transmutation result is just a
result of chance.
In reply to Kevin O'Malley's message of Fri, 5 Dec 2014 17:40:29 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
This seems promising. I'm having trouble seeing the difference between
neutron tunneling and neutron capture.
[snip]
Neutron capture assumes the presence of free neutrons, which one would also
expect to turn up in
It is more probable that hydrogen provides protons which enter the nucleus
in the LENR reaction. This proton surplus excess is the function of
hydrogen in the Ni/H reactor. The Ni/H LENR reaction results in a proton
rich nucleus. This nuclear condition is stabilized through the emission of
the
https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:27064120
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:14:56 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
It is more probable that hydrogen provides protons which enter the nucleus
in the LENR reaction. This proton surplus excess is the function of
hydrogen in the Ni/H reactor. The Ni/H LENR reaction results in a proton
.
This doesn't explain why the reaction stopped at 62Ni.
The one particle is one in a million. The transmutation result is just a
result of chance.
This seems promising. I'm having trouble seeing the difference between
neutron tunneling and neutron capture.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Mats Lewan in a revised addition to his book on Rossi earlier this year
has added a comment about a paper
...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:34 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report--
Mats Lewan in a revised addition to his book on Rossi earlier this year has
added a comment about a paper from Carl-Oscar Gullström.
He mentions
Solved, I think it is grape power
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCNNqgKqnaQ
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Neutron as produced, but the question is when. Are they primary to
causation or are these neutron formed as an stabilizing adjustment of the
with explaining the Rossi Effect.
Bob
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 12:06 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report--
What I find most interesting is that Elforsk, Gullstrom and Dr. Myron Evans
have
[mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:34 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report--
Mats Lewan in a revised addition to his book on Rossi earlier this year has
added a comment about a paper from Carl-Oscar Gullström.
He
Mats Lewan in a revised addition to his book on Rossi earlier this year has
added a comment about a paper from Carl-Oscar Gullström.
He mentions that Carl-Oscar Gullström’s paper, “Low Radiation fusion through
bound neutron Tunneling” got some positive attention from Bo Höistad, one of
the
Neutron as produced, but the question is when. Are they primary to
causation or are these neutron formed as an stabilizing adjustment of the
nucleus after the LENR reaction takes place?
The question is what gets through the coulomb barrier: neutrons, EMF,
protons?
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:33
15 matches
Mail list logo
