[Vo]: Re: Re: Di-Ozone
On Mar 18, 2007, at 5:13 AM, R.C.Macaulay wrote: Last year we tested a high speed water vortex inducer that produced a near perfect cylinder shaped vortex. This shape differs from a parabolic tornado shape we are all familar with. The cylinder shape has an eyewall like a hurricane. This cylinder shape permits a better examination of free electrons and a host of rabbit holes one can travel and become mis-directed. Zac wrote.. Any interesting observations? Howdy Zac, Noticed when the test rig is immersed in a square tank a number of random sympathetic water vortex are generated. These form and decay over a short period. By random, I mean they may be horizontal, diagonal or parallel, however, mostly horizontal shaped hovering in the northwest quadrant of the tank. We believe they may have entirely different properties than the main cylinder. This year's plans include examining a cute trick using a pair of resonating synchronizing tuning forks for ultrasonic studies plus magnets and microwave if we can ever figure out where and how to aim. Fun stuff !! Designing a modular system of mechanical components for the next stage of the tests began late last year. Since we are a privately owned company with internal funding and make a practice of NOT patenting new designs, we can function uninhibited like a skunk works mentality. What is strange about the effort is that we spent most of the past 3 years research budget on the monster and received only indirect benefit from the work. We spent a fraction on a new combo flow metering control valve and already have it in production. Back in 1980 the businesses that were using computers wound up owning those that didn't. This decade will demonstrate the companies with active research budgets won't own firms that don't.. there won't be any other firms. Soon gone will be competitor number 3 and up. In most categories of industry there will be a sole supplier. In the auto world it will be Toyota. get the picture? The fun part is that GE Capital owns most industries worldwide now... not the stock.. just the paper, which is tantamount to ownership with out the marriage liscense. Richard
[Vo]: Re: Re: Di-Ozone
For a projectile what matters is momentum, and light does have momentum, that's what pushes solar sails. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure Michel - Original Message - From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:03 PM Subject: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone Howdy Jones, You amaze me with your ability to stretch the elastic of the mind. One must eat a heartly breakfast and tighten the safety belt before launching into one of your posts grin that can range from rail guns to Ormus... and that is a stretch. Now that light has been accepted as having particle or weight, it can be taken to the next step and think of light having projectile force qualities. A rail gun projectile would not necessarily require a socalled mass ( I have always been abhorred by the term mass). A better constructed railgun would fire a projectile of light... hmmm.. a strange beasty indeed.. Why so ? Because the projectile could be tuned to either/or focus or impact. Strange account of a battle predicted centuries ago where the flesh,eyes and tongue will rot while they are still standing ( bones remain) Zec: 14. This description seeems to indicate a type of a ray gun, however, the projectile does not knock the person off their feet.. only dissolves the flesh. You referred to Barry Carter's Subtleenergy website that mentions a new method of producing O3 and O6 but does not describe the process. He does describe the healing qualities of vortex induced ormus water. Reminds me of the account of the angel that would stir or trouble the waters in the pool. Whoever would be the first sick person to enter the pool thereafter would be healed. If the stirring means inducing a water vortex and only the first person would be healed, could this mean the vortex was destroyed by entering the pool and the residual remains of the vortex properties dissappear? Out in the wildwood behind the Dime Box Saloon lurks an old whisky still left over from the old days. The tale goes that sippin some that thinkin drinkin stuff could make a person believe the earth was flat. Richard
Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Di-Ozone
In my natural philosophy, light has an _apparent_ momentum, because the nature of light is such that it refuses to be subjected to a mechanical force. (I do mean refuses and not simply resists). Harry Michel Jullian wrote: For a projectile what matters is momentum, and light does have momentum, that's what pushes solar sails. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure Michel - Original Message - From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:03 PM Subject: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone Howdy Jones, You amaze me with your ability to stretch the elastic of the mind. One must eat a heartly breakfast and tighten the safety belt before launching into one of your posts grin that can range from rail guns to Ormus... and that is a stretch. Now that light has been accepted as having particle or weight, it can be taken to the next step and think of light having projectile force qualities. A rail gun projectile would not necessarily require a socalled mass ( I have always been abhorred by the term mass). A better constructed railgun would fire a projectile of light... hmmm.. a strange beasty indeed.. Why so ? Because the projectile could be tuned to either/or focus or impact. Strange account of a battle predicted centuries ago where the flesh,eyes and tongue will rot while they are still standing ( bones remain) Zec: 14. This description seeems to indicate a type of a ray gun, however, the projectile does not knock the person off their feet.. only dissolves the flesh. You referred to Barry Carter's Subtleenergy website that mentions a new method of producing O3 and O6 but does not describe the process. He does describe the healing qualities of vortex induced ormus water. Reminds me of the account of the angel that would stir or trouble the waters in the pool. Whoever would be the first sick person to enter the pool thereafter would be healed. If the stirring means inducing a water vortex and only the first person would be healed, could this mean the vortex was destroyed by entering the pool and the residual remains of the vortex properties dissappear? Out in the wildwood behind the Dime Box Saloon lurks an old whisky still left over from the old days. The tale goes that sippin some that thinkin drinkin stuff could make a person believe the earth was flat. Richard
Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Di-Ozone
Well, it does bounce back from the object (e.g. solar sail) it imparted momentum to, with total momentum being conserved and all. Michel - Original Message - From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 6:09 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Di-Ozone In my natural philosophy, light has an _apparent_ momentum, because the nature of light is such that it refuses to be subjected to a mechanical force. (I do mean refuses and not simply resists). Harry Michel Jullian wrote: For a projectile what matters is momentum, and light does have momentum, that's what pushes solar sails. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure Michel - Original Message - From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:03 PM Subject: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone Howdy Jones, You amaze me with your ability to stretch the elastic of the mind. One must eat a heartly breakfast and tighten the safety belt before launching into one of your posts grin that can range from rail guns to Ormus... and that is a stretch. Now that light has been accepted as having particle or weight, it can be taken to the next step and think of light having projectile force qualities. A rail gun projectile would not necessarily require a socalled mass ( I have always been abhorred by the term mass). A better constructed railgun would fire a projectile of light... hmmm.. a strange beasty indeed.. Why so ? Because the projectile could be tuned to either/or focus or impact. Strange account of a battle predicted centuries ago where the flesh,eyes and tongue will rot while they are still standing ( bones remain) Zec: 14. This description seeems to indicate a type of a ray gun, however, the projectile does not knock the person off their feet.. only dissolves the flesh. You referred to Barry Carter's Subtleenergy website that mentions a new method of producing O3 and O6 but does not describe the process. He does describe the healing qualities of vortex induced ormus water. Reminds me of the account of the angel that would stir or trouble the waters in the pool. Whoever would be the first sick person to enter the pool thereafter would be healed. If the stirring means inducing a water vortex and only the first person would be healed, could this mean the vortex was destroyed by entering the pool and the residual remains of the vortex properties dissappear? Out in the wildwood behind the Dime Box Saloon lurks an old whisky still left over from the old days. The tale goes that sippin some that thinkin drinkin stuff could make a person believe the earth was flat. Richard
Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Di-Ozone
If light was literally a projectile, then it should be literally subject to the laws of mechanics and momentum changes should vary continuously. However, we know empirically that light of a particular wavelength can only bring about discrete changes of momentum. Harry Michel Jullian wrote: Well, it does bounce back from the object (e.g. solar sail) it imparted momentum to, with total momentum being conserved and all. Michel - Original Message - From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 6:09 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Re: Di-Ozone In my natural philosophy, light has an _apparent_ momentum, because the nature of light is such that it refuses to be subjected to a mechanical force. (I do mean refuses and not simply resists). Harry Michel Jullian wrote: For a projectile what matters is momentum, and light does have momentum, that's what pushes solar sails. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure Michel - Original Message - From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:03 PM Subject: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone Howdy Jones, You amaze me with your ability to stretch the elastic of the mind. One must eat a heartly breakfast and tighten the safety belt before launching into one of your posts grin that can range from rail guns to Ormus... and that is a stretch. Now that light has been accepted as having particle or weight, it can be taken to the next step and think of light having projectile force qualities. A rail gun projectile would not necessarily require a socalled mass ( I have always been abhorred by the term mass). A better constructed railgun would fire a projectile of light... hmmm.. a strange beasty indeed.. Why so ? Because the projectile could be tuned to either/or focus or impact. Strange account of a battle predicted centuries ago where the flesh,eyes and tongue will rot while they are still standing ( bones remain) Zec: 14. This description seeems to indicate a type of a ray gun, however, the projectile does not knock the person off their feet.. only dissolves the flesh. You referred to Barry Carter's Subtleenergy website that mentions a new method of producing O3 and O6 but does not describe the process. He does describe the healing qualities of vortex induced ormus water. Reminds me of the account of the angel that would stir or trouble the waters in the pool. Whoever would be the first sick person to enter the pool thereafter would be healed. If the stirring means inducing a water vortex and only the first person would be healed, could this mean the vortex was destroyed by entering the pool and the residual remains of the vortex properties dissappear? Out in the wildwood behind the Dime Box Saloon lurks an old whisky still left over from the old days. The tale goes that sippin some that thinkin drinkin stuff could make a person believe the earth was flat. Richard
