Re: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR?

frigorific! Harry On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Jack Cole wrote: > Good points Alain. I suppose it may all become a mute point as more > positive results roll in, and if there is a running reactor that the public > can visit. > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > >> La

Re: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR?

even if commercially Cold fusion seems the best (brand is known, with good layman image assumed it works), the fact that it sahre the name with adobe technology, and with many other sentense like jaz fusion or cold drink is a problem for tech-watcher like me... LENR is not shared by any other conc

Re: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR?

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Jones Beene wrote: > Neologisms-R-us…* * > > What is the take-away message from any “designer name”? First - it should > point to the most attractive feature, and second it should be fairly > unique. > > > Or maybe it should simply be kewl: http://www.adobe.com/

Re: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR?

Jack Cole wrote: > > I agree that it doesn't matter to us who have looked into the research, > but do you think it would make a difference with the broader population of > scientists, general public, and the patent office? > No, that is a forlorn hope. That is the reason people invent euphemisms

RE: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR?

Neologisms-R-us. What is the take-away message from any "designer name"? First - it should point to the most attractive feature, and second it should be fairly unique. The underlying reaction is almost certainly Quantum Mechanical - as opposed to thermonuclear. The least we can do is put a "Q"

Re: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR?

Good points Alain. I suppose it may all become a mute point as more positive results roll in, and if there is a running reactor that the public can visit. On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > Last year the same question was > raised

Re: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR?

Last year the same question was raised. My first longitudinal hair cutter opinion was to use LENR (beside being precise and popular, that term is easy to search in google). however after discussing with businessmen, th

Re: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR?

How about LAPFHER Lattice Assisted Pons Fleischmann Heat Effect Reactor On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Jack Cole wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a new post up where I explore the issue of the language used to > describe LENR. I would be interested in the views of others here regarding > this mat

Re: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR?

oops I meant How about LAFPHER Lattice Assisted Fleischmann Pons Heat Effect Reactor On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote: > > From: "Jed Rothwell" > > Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2013 7:07:32 PM > > Subject: Re: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for

Re: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR?

> From: "Jed Rothwell" > Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2013 7:07:32 PM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR? > > Until everyone agrees on what cold fusion is, there is no point to > inventing a new name for it. I think I'll go with "LENT"

RE: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR?

Jed sez: > Until everyone agrees on what cold fusion is, there > is no point to inventing a new name for it. As well as to denigrate what is essentially a placeholder word. Unfortunately, countless attempts to suggest this to Mr. Krivit have failed. In the meantime, see Lomax's latest

Re: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR?

Hi Jed, I agree that it doesn't matter to us who have looked into the research, but do you think it would make a difference with the broader population of scientists, general public, and the patent office? Jack On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Until everyone agrees on wh

Re: [Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR?

Until everyone agrees on what cold fusion is, there is no point to inventing a new name for it. It does not matter in any case, because the name is not the thing. Many words are technically inaccurate, obsolete or misleading. A "solid-state disk" (SSD) is not disk-shaped, and a round shape tells y

[Vo]:A Language Upgrade Needed for LENR?

Hi All, I have a new post up where I explore the issue of the language used to describe LENR. I would be interested in the views of others here regarding this matter as I always find your opinions of interest and valuable. http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2013/06/03/language-upgrade-needed-lenr/