Alexander Hollins wrote:
Lets NOT actually discuss the political posts that caused the whole
furor on this list, mmmkay? That's just throwing gasoline back on
the fire that our good moderator is TRYING to put out. You want to
discuss grok and his posting habits and politics directly, send it
Lets NOT actually discuss the political posts that caused the whole
furor on this list, mmmkay? That's just throwing gasoline back on
the fire that our good moderator is TRYING to put out. You want to
discuss grok and his posting habits and politics directly, send it to
B where it belongs PLEASE
OrionWorks wrote:
I recall two recent comments of worth:
Harry Veeder wrote:
If political commentary is banned, why not ban religious
commentary as well?
And from Stephen Lawrance:
The specific problem was caused by incontinent spraying of
political issues over every topic
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Harry Veeder wrote:
> Maybe I did miss something. Did you ban someone for their religious
> commentary?
This was my May 20 message:
> Let's just do the usual: move all the off-topic discussions to
> vortexB-L.
>
> It's time for a temporary ban on all off-topic discussions, m
I recall two recent comments of worth:
> Harry Veeder wrote:
> > If political commentary is banned, why not ban religious
> > commentary as well?
And from Stephen Lawrance:
> The specific problem was caused by incontinent spraying of
> political issues over every topic which was introduced.
> Re
- Original Message -
From: William Beaty
Date: Monday, June 8, 2009 3:35 pm
Subject: Re: RE: [Vo]:BAN ON POLITICS still in effect here
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Harry Veeder wrote:
>
> > If political commentary is banned, why not ban religious
> commentary as well?
>
Leaking pen that illustrates what I mean.
Harry
- Original Message -
From: leaking pen
Date: Monday, June 8, 2009 2:19 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BAN ON POLITICS still in effect here
> im sorry, science has happened with a downright COMBATIVE political
> framework. large scale cor
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Harry Veeder wrote:
> If political commentary is banned, why not ban religious commentary as well?
It is."Off topic," as in politics/religion.Perhaps you've been
away and missed these threads?
(( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) )))
W
9 11:09:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BAN ON POLITICS still in effect here
Harry Veeder wrote:
> If political commentary is banned, why not ban religious commentary as well?
The specific problem was caused by incontinent spraying of political
issues over every topic which was introduced. Religious c
cal framework.
> Harry
>
> - Original Message -
> From: leaking pen
> Date: Monday, June 8, 2009 12:53 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:BAN ON POLITICS still in effect here
>
>> the difference between science and hard facts, and politics and
>> opinion?
>> seems
Harry Veeder wrote:
> If political commentary is banned, why not ban religious commentary as well?
The specific problem was caused by incontinent spraying of political
issues over every topic which was introduced. Religious commentary,
which has occasionally gotten a bit out of hand in the past
jonssonswe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 12:46 PM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:BAN ON POLITICS still in effect here
>
> How do you make the differentiation between politics and physics? Hard.
>
> Best wishes,
> David
>
> On 6/8/09, W
The irony is science cannot happen without a supportive political framework.
Harry
- Original Message -
From: leaking pen
Date: Monday, June 8, 2009 12:53 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BAN ON POLITICS still in effect here
> the difference between science and hard facts, and politics
If political commentary is banned, why not ban religious commentary as well?
Harry
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Fink
Date: Monday, June 8, 2009 12:59 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:BAN ON POLITICS still in effect here
> Politics will ultimately determine the brand of physics we are
> a
Politics will ultimately determine the brand of physics we are allowed to
believe.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: David Jonsson [mailto:davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 12:46 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BAN ON POLITICS still in effect here
How
the difference between science and hard facts, and politics and opinion?
seems easy to me.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:45 AM, David
Jonsson wrote:
> How do you make the differentiation between politics and physics? Hard.
>
> Best wishes,
> David
>
> On 6/8/09, William Beaty wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Jun
How do you make the differentiation between politics and physics? Hard.
Best wishes,
David
On 6/8/09, William Beaty wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Mark S Bilk wrote:
>
>> So anyone who speaks out against U.S. government policies is well
>> justified in doing so anonymously. In this case anonymity
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Mark S Bilk wrote:
> So anyone who speaks out against U.S. government policies is well
> justified in doing so anonymously. In this case anonymity does _not_
> mean:
>
> >>"probably criminal element" ..."teenager," or "newbie user."
Then I'll permanently ban him from both lis
18 matches
Mail list logo
