Re: [Vo]:Comment by Anderson at Forbes
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: I’m a Professor Ameritus in Electrical Engineering ... Everything I read in the 29 page report, and following challenges as answered by the authors, seems extremely convincing. All objections, typically suggesting fraud, are not to me at all convincing. Tomorrow will tell! Is it unfair to be suspicious if he can't spell his own title?
Re: [Vo]:Comment by Anderson at Forbes
Yes it is unfair. Quit sneering. It is a violation of rule #2. One of the debunkers was recently removed due to sneering. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: I’m a Professor Ameritus in Electrical Engineering ... Everything I read in the 29 page report, and following challenges as answered by the authors, seems extremely convincing. All objections, typically suggesting fraud, are not to me at all convincing. Tomorrow will tell! Is it unfair to be suspicious if he can't spell his own title?
Re: [Vo]:Comment by Anderson at Forbes
Cude wrote: Is it unfair to be suspicious if he can't spell his own title? On the contrary, this adds versimillitude to his posting. Based on my experience editing papers, I conclude that many American chemistry professors cannot spell. Neither can I, but I use voice input so I can easily spell words such as versimillitude. Or orthogonal. How do you like them apples? Stan Pons and Melvin Miles are very good at spelling. Dennis Cravens and the late Julian Schwinger . . . not so much. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Comment by Anderson at Forbes
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote: Is it unfair to be suspicious if he can't spell his own title? He may not be a native speaker. Eric
Re: [Vo]:Comment by Anderson at Forbes
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: Is it unfair to be suspicious if he can't spell his own title? He may not be a native speaker. No need to respond to that one. I was too eager to reply with a retort. It seems I lost my footing there. ;) Eric
[Vo]:Comment by Anderson at Forbes
Here is a comment at Forbes from someone who sounds like he should be working on cold fusion with the rest of the superannuated geezers. Let's see if we can find him. - Jed DONALD ANDERSON I’m a Professor Ameritus in Electrical Engineering, Ph.D. was in developing long-lived vacuum tubes with nickel fired in hydrogen and vacuum, at temperatures around 1000C. Since have been heavily involved in alternative energy (solar thermal and wind. Everything I read in the 29 page report, and following challenges as answered by the authors, seems extremely convincing. All objections, typically suggesting fraud, are not to me at all convincing. Tomorrow will tell!
Re: [Vo]:Comment by Anderson at Forbes
By Tomorrow one presumes he means tomorrow in the literary sense. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Here is a comment at Forbes from someone who sounds like he should be working on cold fusion with the rest of the superannuated geezers. Let's see if we can find him. - Jed DONALD ANDERSON I’m a Professor Ameritus in Electrical Engineering, Ph.D. was in developing long-lived vacuum tubes with nickel fired in hydrogen and vacuum, at temperatures around 1000C. Since have been heavily involved in alternative energy (solar thermal and wind. Everything I read in the 29 page report, and following challenges as answered by the authors, seems extremely convincing. All objections, typically suggesting fraud, are not to me at all convincing. Tomorrow will tell!
Re: [Vo]:Comment by Anderson at Forbes
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: I’m a Professor Ameritus in Electrical Engineering ... Everything I read in the 29 page report, and following challenges as answered by the authors, seems extremely convincing. All objections, typically suggesting fraud, are not to me at all convincing. Tomorrow will tell! (Facetiousness warning.) It would seem he must not have been a very good professor, then, given that he has passed a positive judgment on a manifestly sloppy paper. He should speed himself to the nearest physicist and receive guidance. Eric
