Re: [Vo]:Heresy warning: variable isotope decay. Also noted, the ether is(?) involved...
On 09/01/2012 04:24 PM, David L Babcock wrote: An excerpt from Giza Dearth Star, link below: [seen]..in two separate experiments in two different labs. It isn't just solar flares that seem to induce changes in radioactive decay rate. Changes in solar rotation and activity,/and the Earth's position on its orbital path around the Sun also appear to have an effect/, and it's the latter variable which seems to have been decisive in the research. Between July 2005 and June 2011, continued monitoring has apparently shown consistent annual variation in the decay rate of chlorine 36, peaking in January and February, and ebbing in July and August.(Emphasis added) Read more:NEW DETECTION METHOD FOR SOLAR FLARES: VARIATIONS IN RADIATION EMISSION http://gizadeathstar.com/2012/08/new-detection-method-for-solar-flares-variations-in-radiation-emission/#ixzz25FHEeuxf - Giza Death Star Community This really rang my chimes, as I had read -a month or two ago?- that the existence of the ether has some good evidence for it, and that measurements showed that the solar system is moving through this ether at IIRC 4,000 km/hr, towards (some point). Towards the Solar apex https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_apex, at roughly 16 km/s, or 57600 km/h. Not to be confused with the orbital movement of the Sun (and the Solar system) around the Galactic center, which is of roughly 220 km/s, and is called the movement of the Local Standard of Rest. Now, that's interesting in itself, the Local Standard of Rest, as they call it. Which that means? It means that everything in the local vicinity of the Sun is moving at that speed. And the question that is most interesting to ask yourself is, which does everything means, particularly in this context?, that is, in the context of the arm of the galaxy we're in. Regarding changes in decay rates and the relation to cosmic factors, this has been discussed here in the past, see http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg34721.html I even wrote to Sturrock and Fischbach, suggesting that a kind of friction against the ether background can explain the phase difference between the changes in decay rates and the Sun-Earth distance, i.e. that the changes seem to be aligned with the direction the Solar system has towards the Solar apex. See http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg39971.html Just to be completely ignored, of course. Best regards, Mauro If these two hideous heresies should turn out to agree the whole edifice of modern physics may crumble. I wish I could provide a link to the ether article, it was a peach, giving (?) ten anomalous stick-in-your-eye findings that physics won't look at. Ol' Bab, who was an engineer
RE: [Vo]:Heresy warning: variable isotope decay. Also noted, the ether is(?) involved...
Heck, Mauro - perhaps they appreciate that you have an insightful explanation, and it is one which they missed. Or do not want to deal with. It would not surprise me (in general, as I do not know anything about them in particular) - given the surprising vanity and the peer-pressure on scientists at a few schools (the ones who are not as competent as they pretend to be) - if - at some future date, someone tries to sneak your suggestion into another paper without attribution. or has that already happened :-) The Peter Principle . actually, Dilbert's version - is as relevant at Universities as at Large Corporations IMO. One is more likely to get a thoughtful response from the most competent people in the field, and less likely from the wannabes. From: Mauro Lacy I even wrote to Sturrock and Fischbach, suggesting that a kind of friction against the ether background can explain the phase difference between the changes in decay rates and the Sun-Earth distance, i.e. that the changes seem to be aligned with the direction the Solar system has towards the Solar apex. See http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg39971.html Just to be completely ignored, of course. Best regards, Mauro
[Vo]:Heresy warning: variable isotope decay. Also noted, the ether is(?) involved...
An excerpt from Giza Dearth Star, link below: [seen]..in two separate experiments in two different labs. It isn't just solar flares that seem to induce changes in radioactive decay rate. Changes in solar rotation and activity,/and the Earth's position on its orbital path around the Sun also appear to have an effect/, and it's the latter variable which seems to have been decisive in the research. Between July 2005 and June 2011, continued monitoring has apparently shown consistent annual variation in the decay rate of chlorine 36, peaking in January and February, and ebbing in July and August.(Emphasis added) Read more:NEW DETECTION METHOD FOR SOLAR FLARES: VARIATIONS IN RADIATION EMISSION http://gizadeathstar.com/2012/08/new-detection-method-for-solar-flares-variations-in-radiation-emission/#ixzz25FHEeuxf - Giza Death Star Community This really rang my chimes, as I had read -a month or two ago?- that the existence of the ether has some good evidence for it, and that measurements showed that the solar system is moving through this ether at IIRC 4,000 km/hr, towards (some point). If these two hideous heresies should turn out to agree the whole edifice of modern physics may crumble. I wish I could provide a link to the ether article, it was a peach, giving (?) ten anomalous stick-in-your-eye findings that physics won't look at. Ol' Bab, who was an engineer
Re: [Vo]:Heresy warning: variable isotope decay. Also noted, the ether is(?) involved...
I suggest shielding the radioactive source from electromagnetic fields (using a tempest cage), then see if the rates still change or remain the constant. Cheers: Axil On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 3:24 PM, David L Babcock ol...@rochester.rr.comwrote: An excerpt from Giza Dearth Star, link below: [seen]..in two separate experiments in two different labs. “It isn’t just solar flares that seem to induce changes in radioactive decay rate. Changes in solar rotation and activity, *and the Earth’s position on its orbital path around the Sun also appear to have an effect*, and it’s the latter variable which seems to have been decisive in the research. Between July 2005 and June 2011, continued monitoring has apparently shown consistent annual variation in the decay rate of chlorine 36, peaking in January and February, and ebbing in July and August.”(Emphasis added) Read more: NEW DETECTION METHOD FOR SOLAR FLARES: VARIATIONS IN RADIATION EMISSIONhttp://gizadeathstar.com/2012/08/new-detection-method-for-solar-flares-variations-in-radiation-emission/#ixzz25FHEeuxf - Giza Death Star Community This really rang my chimes, as I had read -a month or two ago?- that the existence of the ether has some good evidence for it, and that measurements showed that the solar system is moving through this ether at IIRC 4,000 km/hr, towards (some point). If these two hideous heresies should turn out to agree the whole edifice of modern physics may crumble. I wish I could provide a link to the ether article, it was a peach, giving (?) ten anomalous stick-in-your-eye findings that physics won't look at. Ol' Bab, who was an engineer
Re: [Vo]:Heresy warning: variable isotope decay. Also noted, the ether is(?) involved...
I keep wondering who else might have accumulated data that could be analyzed. I.e. who might have collected data from a long-lived source under consistent conditions over a long enough period of time. Maybe monitoring equipment from cold war era waste sites. Jeff On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: I suggest shielding the radioactive source from electromagnetic fields (using a tempest cage), then see if the rates still change or remain the constant. Cheers: Axil On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 3:24 PM, David L Babcock ol...@rochester.rr.comwrote: An excerpt from Giza Dearth Star, link below: [seen]..in two separate experiments in two different labs. “It isn’t just solar flares that seem to induce changes in radioactive decay rate. Changes in solar rotation and activity, *and the Earth’s position on its orbital path around the Sun also appear to have an effect *, and it’s the latter variable which seems to have been decisive in the research. Between July 2005 and June 2011, continued monitoring has apparently shown consistent annual variation in the decay rate of chlorine 36, peaking in January and February, and ebbing in July and August.”(Emphasis added) Read more: NEW DETECTION METHOD FOR SOLAR FLARES: VARIATIONS IN RADIATION EMISSIONhttp://gizadeathstar.com/2012/08/new-detection-method-for-solar-flares-variations-in-radiation-emission/#ixzz25FHEeuxf - Giza Death Star Community This really rang my chimes, as I had read -a month or two ago?- that the existence of the ether has some good evidence for it, and that measurements showed that the solar system is moving through this ether at IIRC 4,000 km/hr, towards (some point). If these two hideous heresies should turn out to agree the whole edifice of modern physics may crumble. I wish I could provide a link to the ether article, it was a peach, giving (?) ten anomalous stick-in-your-eye findings that physics won't look at. Ol' Bab, who was an engineer
