I accidentally hit the send button before I was complexly finished composing
the original post.
Let me follow up my take on sam.
As far as I can tell Sam presents no actual evidence in his post as to why
he thinks BLP Mills is a scam operation. What he does state, and this is
quite
OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
As far as I can tell Sam presents no actual evidence in his post as
to why he thinks BLP Mills is a scam operation. What he does state,
and this is quite revealing, is that he is upset over the fact that
three of his own science articles posted out
I think with so much money invested and nothing delivered, no independent
tests whatsoever, it is hard to think this is not a scam. They would easily
have money to test all other theories of LENR and come with something
useful.
From Daniel
I think with so much money invested and nothing delivered,
no independent tests whatsoever, it is hard to think this
is not a scam.
I disagree. There is also some disagreement on the aspect of how one
determines an independent test. BLP would say yes independent
tests have been
Do you really think the scarcity of experimental results justifies the
investment of 60mil$? It is easier to think that they just bribed a few
other researchers just to fake results.
This amount of money is enough to come with a proff of concept for any form
of fusion, even tokamak.
From Daniel
Do you really think the scarcity of experimental results
justifies the investment of 60mil$? It is easier to think
that they just bribed a few other researchers just to fake
results. This amount of money is enough to come with a
proff of concept for any form of fusion, even
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you really think the scarcity of experimental results justifies the
investment of 60mil$?
You are not privy to the results, so you have no idea whether there is a
scarcity or a plethora of results. You have not read the contract so you
have no idea
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
All tokamaks produce some excess energy.
As do skeptics.
T
I talked about proof of concept, not a working device. Even FP fit in this
description. But BLP didn't show anything that already worked. For example,
look at this tokamak:
http://www.toodlepip.com/tokamak/pictures/tm1.jpg
And it was not even one of the first.
How can you justify 60mil?
Even this:
http://www.generalfusion.com/
Didn't require all those millions and it is a massive device.
In this new Mills patent, you can see where some of the investment capital
went in the blacklight power venture:
http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20110114075
It looks to me like Mills and associates must have gone through all possible
hydride reactions with every possible transition
So, Mills is trying the same approach as farma companies do, massively
parallel testing substances. But I don't think Rossi's catalyzer is about
substance, but rather in how the lattice of the substance is arranged
spatially.
Daniel Rocha wrote:
So, Mills is trying the same approach as farma companies do, massively
parallel testing substances. But I don't think Rossi's catalyzer is
about substance, but rather in how the lattice of the substance is
arranged spatially.
These remarkable instruments described at
That's the Rossi's secret sauce!
2011/8/11 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
The SEM alone cannot do the whole job. Even if you know how the lattice is
shaped and what elements and compounds it includes, you still may not know
how to fabricate a similar arrangement.
- Jed
Daniel Rocha wrote:
That's the Rossi's secret sauce!
The SEM alone cannot do the whole job. Even if you know how the
lattice is shaped and what elements and compounds it includes, you
still may not know how to fabricate a similar arrangement.
Right! If he has a secret sauce (a
I am going from memory here, but Rossi said early on that the secret
additive is absolutely required to get useful energy out of his core. Using
the nickel powder alone does not produce heat.
The Rossi process is the amalgamation of multiple mechanisms each of which
when taken separately fail
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
... What tends to happen under these kinds of circumstances where someone
appears to be on a self-righteous kamikaze mission to destroy the reputation
of an individual and his company.
Hmm... Funny thing this question came up as I had been reading the
A recent Google newsfeed on Blacklight Power brought to my attention a
link from someone with a handle of sam_michael who claims Dr. Mills and
Blacklight Power is a scam operation of immense proportions.
See:
http://www.nowpublic.com/tech-biz/blacklight-power-most-incredible-scam
I guess Witch Doctor is right about BLP. ;)
Is this the whole thing? Does Sam Michael present any evidence that
Blacklight Power is a scam? As far as I can tell, Steven Johnson quoted the
entire set of assertions:
“Sam” claims: I take the risk of slander/libel here but must take a stand
to protect investors and the general public about
20 matches
Mail list logo
