Eric, thanks for summarizing his patent for the Vortex readers.
From patenting ethics point of view this is a very strange approach trying
to patent something, It almost looks like a quick job, dumping his mindset.
His last figure is an example of that.
He is following the track of worldwide
i found a patent application that was published on December 2013 on Least
Action Nuclear Process, claiming an alternative explanation of what most of
us see as LENR.
The inventor, Daniel S. Szumski, presented this theory during ICCF17 I
believe.
Jed posted it here at Vortex a while ago.
Link to
The author of the patent has the basics right, but I wouldn’t think he
could patent the process.
In Rossi type LENR, there is energy accumulation and storage going on. The
LENR process involves both energy storage and its concentration to
accumulate atomic levels of power.
The Ni/H reactor
Yes, I have to agree on the very small chance of getting this patent
application granted.
A bit further in time this effect will be added to the set of physical
principles. Physical principles can't be patented.
Op zondag 19 januari 2014 heeft Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com het volgende
geschreven:
The author lives in Davis, California, which is not that far from me. Here
is the abstract:
This invention describes the Least Action Nuclear Process (LANP). What
makes this process different than that occurring in LENR or cold fusion
devises is the temperature at which the nuclear process
5 matches
Mail list logo
