I'm not sure what work you are referring to:
This one had an open top and claimed excess heat.
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTproduction.pdf
Here's one where he had a top on it and showed mostly no excess heat, but
supposedly excess hydrogen. The alleged episodes of excess heat are
Thank you. If true, that refutes my point about his work being debunked.
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 8:33 AM Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Jack Cole wrote:
>
> We disagree, so I'll drop it as not being productive. I believe that the
>> falseness of Mizuno's previous results was exposed and he/you are
Jack Cole wrote:
We disagree, so I'll drop it as not being productive. I believe that the
> falseness of Mizuno's previous results was exposed and he/you are unwilling
> to spend the time to address the issues that showed how his experiments
> were likely compromised.
>
I did, at the time. I
I wrote:
> You have to address the issues that Kowalski et. al. raised and I quoted
>> above.
>>
>
> I am not obligated. I do not agree, and I am not going to take the time to
> explain why.
>
I should at least explain the main reasons. Mizuno did not use the same
method of calorimetry Kowalski
We disagree, so I'll drop it as not being productive. I believe that the
falseness of Mizuno's previous results was exposed and he/you are unwilling
to spend the time to address the issues that showed how his experiments
were likely compromised. This reminds me of the profs who refused to
5 matches
Mail list logo
