[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:It is unlikely Mizuno’s results are a mistake

2019-06-30 Thread Jack Cole
I'm not sure what work you are referring to: This one had an open top and claimed excess heat. https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTproduction.pdf Here's one where he had a top on it and showed mostly no excess heat, but supposedly excess hydrogen. The alleged episodes of excess heat are

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:It is unlikely Mizuno’s results are a mistake

2019-06-30 Thread Jack Cole
Thank you. If true, that refutes my point about his work being debunked. On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 8:33 AM Jed Rothwell wrote: > Jack Cole wrote: > > We disagree, so I'll drop it as not being productive. I believe that the >> falseness of Mizuno's previous results was exposed and he/you are

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:It is unlikely Mizuno’s results are a mistake

2019-06-30 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jack Cole wrote: We disagree, so I'll drop it as not being productive. I believe that the > falseness of Mizuno's previous results was exposed and he/you are unwilling > to spend the time to address the issues that showed how his experiments > were likely compromised. > I did, at the time. I