Re: [Vo]:Re: Old Energy New Money

2008-03-16 Thread R C Macaulay
When the democrats take over this fall, they will surely set thing right. Jeff Howdy Jeff, Thanks for your encouraging words. I couldn't seem to figure out why... the US has few actual home repo's on the books.. the actual losses to date are way under what is claimed to be the potential.

RE: [Vo]:Re: Old Energy New Money

2008-03-16 Thread Jeff Fink
When the democrats take over this fall, they will surely set thing right. Jeff No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1330 - Release Date: 3/15/2008 2:36 PM

Re: [Vo]:Re: Old Energy New Money

2008-03-16 Thread thomas malloy
Jones Beene wrote: - Original Message From: R C Macaulay because it's " too big to fail". Translation.. when there is $ 550 trillion dollars in funny money (derivitives) in play out there ... Isn't "too big to fail" just another mantra (a "lie which to big to admit-to"

[Vo]:Re: Old Energy New Money

2008-03-15 Thread Jones Beene
- Original Message From: R C Macaulay > because it's " too big to fail". Translation.. when there is $ 550 > trillion dollars in funny money (derivitives) in play out there ... Isn't "too big to fail" just another mantra (a "lie which to big to admit-to" so we make it into dogma) .