't get in deeper.
Arnaud
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: dimanche 3 février 2013 18:05
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simulation of Celani Replication by MFMP
I just took a quick look at the calibration conditions for the EU cel
, but I suspect that you would
be able to use it effectively after a learning experience.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Feb 3, 2013 9:43 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simulation of Celani Replication by MFMP
I have concentrated upon the US cells so far
now.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud Kodeck
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Feb 3, 2013 6:04 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Simulation of Celani Replication by MFMP
Hello Dave,
Your tool is powerful! Did you make also the calibration and exercises with
the EU cell? They have reported about
Hello Dave,
Your tool is powerful! Did you make also the calibration and exercises with
the EU cell? They have reported about ~6W excess heat when direct current
applied. The cell reports ~2.5W excess heat with an indirect heating.
US cells have been disappointing up to now. But EU cell shows bet
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Harry Veeder wrote:
>
>>
>> Have you identifided the difference (or error) in MFMP team's program
>> that leads them to find excess power?
>
>
> I don't they have found excess power in their most recent analyses. Have
> they?
>
> As I have men
tex-l
Sent: Sat, Feb 2, 2013 7:59 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simulation of Celani Replication by MFMP
On Feb 2, 2013, at 16:22, David Roberson wrote:
My belief is that if much excess power were generated, it would certainly show
up at the elevated power inputs more than at the lower power steps.
On Feb 2, 2013, at 16:22, David Roberson wrote:
> My belief is that if much excess power were generated, it would certainly
> show up at the elevated power inputs more than at the lower power steps.
Your curve-fitting analyses are always interesting. But I think we should be
careful about adop
: Re: [Vo]:Simulation of Celani Replication by MFMP
Harry Veeder wrote:
Have you identifided the difference (or error) in MFMP team's program
that leads them to find excess power?
I don't they have found excess power in their most recent analyses. Have they?
As I have mentioned h
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simulation of Celani Replication by MFMP
Dave,
Have you identifided the difference (or error) in MFMP team's program
that leads them to find excess power?
Harry
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 12:54 AM, David Roberson wrote:
> The guys at MFMP are still experimenting on th
Harry Veeder wrote:
>
> Have you identifided the difference (or error) in MFMP team's program
> that leads them to find excess power?
>
I don't they have found excess power in their most recent analyses. Have
they?
As I have mentioned here before, what bothers me about Celani's own work is
his
: vortex-l
> Sent: Fri, Feb 1, 2013 10:56 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simulation of Celani Replication by MFMP
>
> I'm not sure the MFMP have shown more than a null result -- I doubt it can
> be taken as a negative result. Celani's P_xs was on the order of many
> watts, if
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l
Sent: Fri, Feb 1, 2013 10:56 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simulation of Celani Replication by MFMP
I'm not sure the MFMP have shown more than a null result -- I doubt it can be
taken as a negative result. Celani's P_xs was on the order of
I'm not sure the MFMP have shown more than a null result -- I doubt it can
be taken as a negative result. Celani's P_xs was on the order of many
watts, if I remember correctly. It seems like he would have had to have
some pretty egregious instrument artifact to get those graphs that have
been cir
That or the wires are torn by too much use and new ones must be provided.
2013/2/2 Jed Rothwell
> That's great work. Thanks. Unfortunately I think you and the MFM have
> demonstrated that Celani is not getting any excess heat. He sent them his
> own wires and they got nothing. Bupkis. Nada. Zil
That's great work. Thanks. Unfortunately I think you and the MFM have
demonstrated that Celani is not getting any excess heat. He sent them his
own wires and they got nothing. Bupkis. Nada. Zilch.
- Jed
Roberson
To: dlroberson
Sent: Sat, Jan 19, 2013 9:52 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simulation of Celani Replication by MFMP
This is the third installment of my explanation of how to use my simulation
program. The last time I left those interested with a task of determining the
roots of the primed coef
David Roberson wrote:
> Most likely less than 1.5 watts was all that I could squeeze out of the
> shape.
That sounds insignificant.
> I mentioned this to the MFMP gang but did not receive any reply. Of
> course, I requested information about the exact test that was being
> conducted and t
looking for.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l
Sent: Thu, Jan 3, 2013 5:35 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simulation of Celani Replication by MFMP
David Roberson wrote:
On many tests, I find it difficult to detect an indication of the underlying
transient curve
]:Simulation of Celani Replication by MFMP
David Roberson wrote:
On many tests, I find it difficult to detect an indication of the underlying
transient curve that is many times greater than the noise surrounding the ideal
response.
Say again? I don't quite follow your conclusion.
David Roberson wrote:
> On many tests, I find it difficult to detect an indication of the
> underlying transient curve that is many times greater than the noise
> surrounding the ideal response.
>
Say again? I don't quite follow your conclusion. Your grammar is a little
convoluted in this parag
Recently I have been simulating the time domain response of the Celani
replication cells that are being tested by the MFMP and am getting excellent
results. My purpose is to detect any excess power that may emanate from the
cells as the temperature sweeps upwards due to power increases. I susp
21 matches
Mail list logo
