Re: [Vo]:The Higgs field and LENR
Axil:
90 years of SM nonsense are enough.
These guys - most mathematicians than only did understand square
integrals... - just did throw away magnetism because it was above their
simple mind.
Thanks to computers we today can integrate thousands of non linear
coupled differential equations of very high polynomial degree.
Everything about dense matter that is potential based only is simply
math rubbish. Such reasoning only works on high levels of atomic
potentials where 1/r3 is not noticeable.
Thus try to understand that a low density field paper(small potentials
only) can explain nothing about basic (dense-) physics in the world.
There are many LENR model based on coherence of matter waves that should
work like solitons. But unluckily dense matter is composed of different
isotopes and there usually is no coherence possible.
Thus I always hear/see people with fantastic ideas but no clue of
reality. 50% of today's papers already fail on children level math & logic.
I hope you are still able to distinguish behavior ("like monopole") and
reality. Reality is a Lagrangian (based on magnetism of course!) that
contains the force equation that fits for all explanations you give -
else its just comedy or fun.
J.W.
On 14.09.2019 05:15, Axil Axil wrote:
Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf
It turns out that the polariton condensate is formed out of the dirac
spinor that contains the left and right handed electron hypercharge
property. It is that quantum property that when condensed forms the
Higgs field. The polariton condensate acts as a topological defect in
the Higgs field that resolves into the Higgs monopole.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:16 PM Vibrator ! > wrote:
LOL some years ago i had an interesting discussion re. 'monopoles'
on PhysOrg:
https://phys.org/news/2014-01-physicists-synthetic-magnetic-monopole-years.html
...suffice to say, colour me skeptical.. ;)
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 5:29 PM Jürg Wyttenbach mailto:ju...@datamart.ch>> wrote:
Axil:
Even if you post this nonsense 10 more times it will never
help to explain the world. It's just a "legal" way to generate
money for research. I here mention that the breakthrough prize
just has been given to a group that has deep connections to
the science (physics) self service money laundering system
(includes journals, reviewers, politics) for work about
gravity that nobody ever will use as it is even more outraging
than the Higgs...
All mass in the universe can be given as EM mass. CERN never
ever will find or has found a Higgs or an other fantasy
particles like quarks.
The Higgs masses are simple proton *resonances *and the quarks
are the same.
A *resonance *is not a particle. The same holds for magnetic
monopoles. Magnetic flux travels at light speed and only
strange minds can believe such a flux can be generated/stopped
out of nothing with an infinitely strong force - when you e.g.
use the outdated Einstein GER.
For all the "strange ideas" above completely new physics will
be needed with almost no relation to current definitions. Thus
if you can provide something - e.g. vacuum fluctuations - that
explain how EM-flux is generated out of nothing then you will
be a hero & I would like It!
To say it once more the gravitation constant is given by the
weak force in SO(4) (generated by the complete coupled 5D
charge rotation). It is "absolutely exact"= as measured and
also explains why gravitation is not absolutely constant,
because the coupling mass (electron weak force bound orbit) in
the 3D,t frame is slightly varying in nuclei with larger Z.
J.W.
On 13.09.2019 03:53, Axil Axil wrote:
Keith Fredericks
http://restframe.com/mm/authors/keith-fredericks/
has presented his research on what he calls superluminal
particles which are magnetic monopoles at ICCS22. I found the
theory that could underpins Keith's finding in a cosmology
course from MIT.
It involves the formation of a topological defect in the
Higgs field. This defect forms when a new Higgs field is
created and the Higgs field combines with the new Higgs
field. This defect in the Higgs field forms a magnetic
monopole that is huge and powerful. A particle forms that has
a mass of 10^20 protons or about a microgram. This energy
level produces a Higgs field defect that meets the dense
Higgs field level of 10^18GeV.
According to cosmology theory, monopoles from Higgs field
cooling appeared about 2 hours after the big bang. We know
Re: [Vo]:The Higgs field and LENR
Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf It turns out that the polariton condensate is formed out of the dirac spinor that contains the left and right handed electron hypercharge property. It is that quantum property that when condensed forms the Higgs field. The polariton condensate acts as a topological defect in the Higgs field that resolves into the Higgs monopole. On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:16 PM Vibrator ! wrote: > LOL some years ago i had an interesting discussion re. 'monopoles' on > PhysOrg: > > > https://phys.org/news/2014-01-physicists-synthetic-magnetic-monopole-years.html > > ...suffice to say, colour me skeptical.. ;) > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 5:29 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > >> Axil: >> >> Even if you post this nonsense 10 more times it will never help to >> explain the world. It's just a "legal" way to generate money for research. >> I here mention that the breakthrough prize just has been given to a group >> that has deep connections to the science (physics) self service money >> laundering system (includes journals, reviewers, politics) for work about >> gravity that nobody ever will use as it is even more outraging than the >> Higgs... >> >> All mass in the universe can be given as EM mass. CERN never ever will >> find or has found a Higgs or an other fantasy particles like quarks. >> >> The Higgs masses are simple proton *resonances *and the quarks are the >> same. >> >> A *resonance *is not a particle. The same holds for magnetic monopoles. >> Magnetic flux travels at light speed and only strange minds can believe >> such a flux can be generated/stopped out of nothing with an infinitely >> strong force - when you e.g. use the outdated Einstein GER. >> >> >> For all the "strange ideas" above completely new physics will be needed >> with almost no relation to current definitions. Thus if you can provide >> something - e.g. vacuum fluctuations - that explain how EM-flux is >> generated out of nothing then you will be a hero & I would like It! >> >> >> To say it once more the gravitation constant is given by the weak force >> in SO(4) (generated by the complete coupled 5D charge rotation). It is >> "absolutely exact"= as measured and also explains why gravitation is not >> absolutely constant, because the coupling mass (electron weak force bound >> orbit) in the 3D,t frame is slightly varying in nuclei with larger Z. >> >> >> >> J.W. >> On 13.09.2019 03:53, Axil Axil wrote: >> >> Keith Fredericks >> >> >> http://restframe.com/mm/authors/keith-fredericks/ >> >> >> has presented his research on what he calls superluminal particles which >> are magnetic monopoles at ICCS22. I found the theory that could underpins >> Keith's finding in a cosmology course from MIT. >> >> >> It involves the formation of a topological defect in the Higgs field. >> This defect forms when a new Higgs field is created and the Higgs field >> combines with the new Higgs field. This defect in the Higgs field forms a >> magnetic monopole that is huge and powerful. A particle forms that has a >> mass of 10^20 protons or about a microgram. This energy level produces a >> Higgs field defect that meets the dense Higgs field level of 10^18GeV. >> >> >> According to cosmology theory, monopoles from Higgs field cooling >> appeared about 2 hours after the big bang. We know that this monopoles can >> form in the present day to support LENR transmutation. >> >> >> First, the particle is a Higgs field condensate and is tachyonic. The >> Higgs field is a tachyonic field. This means that the monopole is not >> superluminal but represents a disturbance in the Higgs field. >> >> >> The lecture is informative from the start and is well worth the time to >> view it in total. It explains how the Higgs field fits into both the >> standard model and the standard cosmological model. It shows the math, and >> then it explains the way dissimilar Higgs field interact. >> >> >> For your convenience, I placed the video pointer of the lecture at 52:58 >> to show the Higgs field spacifics. >> >> >> This area of cosmology is well developed and can be accessed for further >> study by googling "topological defect in the higgs field" >> >> >> Transmutation in LENR is caused by the "higgs abyss" (for further study >> google). The Higgs mechanism distorts the function of quarks due to their >> mass redefinition. >> >> >> In my opinion, Keith's presentation is the most significant presentation >> of this conference and reveals the true nature of the NAE and the science >> that supports it. >> >> >> What is interesting about Keith Fredericks findings is that these >> monopoles form spontaneously from the environment as well as those being >> produced in LENR experiments. Keith Fredericks calls these particles cosmic >> background. He shows them as the agent that produce tracks (strange >> radiation) where matter loss occurs. >> >> >>
Re: [Vo]:The Higgs field and LENR
LOL at 'the punchline' (just watched the vid; 1:17:20) - so once again, the 'monopole' (the archetypal epitome of an oxymoron) is being invoked, here, to patch over an infinity in an otherwise-unworkable theory... ...likeiwise, the existence of unicorns would be consistent with me being the high priestess of the great lord Anumpti Nunu's toothbrush (or else who are the messages coming from?). On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 3:15 AM Vibrator ! wrote: > LOL some years ago i had an interesting discussion re. 'monopoles' on > PhysOrg: > > > https://phys.org/news/2014-01-physicists-synthetic-magnetic-monopole-years.html > > ...suffice to say, colour me skeptical.. ;) > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 5:29 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > >> Axil: >> >> Even if you post this nonsense 10 more times it will never help to >> explain the world. It's just a "legal" way to generate money for research. >> I here mention that the breakthrough prize just has been given to a group >> that has deep connections to the science (physics) self service money >> laundering system (includes journals, reviewers, politics) for work about >> gravity that nobody ever will use as it is even more outraging than the >> Higgs... >> >> All mass in the universe can be given as EM mass. CERN never ever will >> find or has found a Higgs or an other fantasy particles like quarks. >> >> The Higgs masses are simple proton *resonances *and the quarks are the >> same. >> >> A *resonance *is not a particle. The same holds for magnetic monopoles. >> Magnetic flux travels at light speed and only strange minds can believe >> such a flux can be generated/stopped out of nothing with an infinitely >> strong force - when you e.g. use the outdated Einstein GER. >> >> >> For all the "strange ideas" above completely new physics will be needed >> with almost no relation to current definitions. Thus if you can provide >> something - e.g. vacuum fluctuations - that explain how EM-flux is >> generated out of nothing then you will be a hero & I would like It! >> >> >> To say it once more the gravitation constant is given by the weak force >> in SO(4) (generated by the complete coupled 5D charge rotation). It is >> "absolutely exact"= as measured and also explains why gravitation is not >> absolutely constant, because the coupling mass (electron weak force bound >> orbit) in the 3D,t frame is slightly varying in nuclei with larger Z. >> >> >> >> J.W. >> On 13.09.2019 03:53, Axil Axil wrote: >> >> Keith Fredericks >> >> >> http://restframe.com/mm/authors/keith-fredericks/ >> >> >> has presented his research on what he calls superluminal particles which >> are magnetic monopoles at ICCS22. I found the theory that could underpins >> Keith's finding in a cosmology course from MIT. >> >> >> It involves the formation of a topological defect in the Higgs field. >> This defect forms when a new Higgs field is created and the Higgs field >> combines with the new Higgs field. This defect in the Higgs field forms a >> magnetic monopole that is huge and powerful. A particle forms that has a >> mass of 10^20 protons or about a microgram. This energy level produces a >> Higgs field defect that meets the dense Higgs field level of 10^18GeV. >> >> >> According to cosmology theory, monopoles from Higgs field cooling >> appeared about 2 hours after the big bang. We know that this monopoles can >> form in the present day to support LENR transmutation. >> >> >> First, the particle is a Higgs field condensate and is tachyonic. The >> Higgs field is a tachyonic field. This means that the monopole is not >> superluminal but represents a disturbance in the Higgs field. >> >> >> The lecture is informative from the start and is well worth the time to >> view it in total. It explains how the Higgs field fits into both the >> standard model and the standard cosmological model. It shows the math, and >> then it explains the way dissimilar Higgs field interact. >> >> >> For your convenience, I placed the video pointer of the lecture at 52:58 >> to show the Higgs field spacifics. >> >> >> This area of cosmology is well developed and can be accessed for further >> study by googling "topological defect in the higgs field" >> >> >> Transmutation in LENR is caused by the "higgs abyss" (for further study >> google). The Higgs mechanism distorts the function of quarks due to their >> mass redefinition. >> >> >> In my opinion, Keith's presentation is the most significant presentation >> of this conference and reveals the true nature of the NAE and the science >> that supports it. >> >> >> What is interesting about Keith Fredericks findings is that these >> monopoles form spontaneously from the environment as well as those being >> produced in LENR experiments. Keith Fredericks calls these particles cosmic >> background. He shows them as the agent that produce tracks (strange >> radiation) where matter loss occurs. >> >> >> https://youtu.be/seBwiL9InII?t=3178 >> >> -- >> Jürg Wyttenbach >> Bifangstr. 22 >> 8910
Re: [Vo]:The Higgs field and LENR
LOL some years ago i had an interesting discussion re. 'monopoles' on PhysOrg: https://phys.org/news/2014-01-physicists-synthetic-magnetic-monopole-years.html ...suffice to say, colour me skeptical.. ;) On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 5:29 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > Axil: > > Even if you post this nonsense 10 more times it will never help to explain > the world. It's just a "legal" way to generate money for research. I here > mention that the breakthrough prize just has been given to a group that has > deep connections to the science (physics) self service money laundering > system (includes journals, reviewers, politics) for work about gravity > that nobody ever will use as it is even more outraging than the Higgs... > > All mass in the universe can be given as EM mass. CERN never ever will > find or has found a Higgs or an other fantasy particles like quarks. > > The Higgs masses are simple proton *resonances *and the quarks are the > same. > > A *resonance *is not a particle. The same holds for magnetic monopoles. > Magnetic flux travels at light speed and only strange minds can believe > such a flux can be generated/stopped out of nothing with an infinitely > strong force - when you e.g. use the outdated Einstein GER. > > > For all the "strange ideas" above completely new physics will be needed > with almost no relation to current definitions. Thus if you can provide > something - e.g. vacuum fluctuations - that explain how EM-flux is > generated out of nothing then you will be a hero & I would like It! > > > To say it once more the gravitation constant is given by the weak force in > SO(4) (generated by the complete coupled 5D charge rotation). It is > "absolutely exact"= as measured and also explains why gravitation is not > absolutely constant, because the coupling mass (electron weak force bound > orbit) in the 3D,t frame is slightly varying in nuclei with larger Z. > > > > J.W. > On 13.09.2019 03:53, Axil Axil wrote: > > Keith Fredericks > > > http://restframe.com/mm/authors/keith-fredericks/ > > > has presented his research on what he calls superluminal particles which > are magnetic monopoles at ICCS22. I found the theory that could underpins > Keith's finding in a cosmology course from MIT. > > > It involves the formation of a topological defect in the Higgs field. This > defect forms when a new Higgs field is created and the Higgs field combines > with the new Higgs field. This defect in the Higgs field forms a magnetic > monopole that is huge and powerful. A particle forms that has a mass of > 10^20 protons or about a microgram. This energy level produces a Higgs > field defect that meets the dense Higgs field level of 10^18GeV. > > > According to cosmology theory, monopoles from Higgs field cooling appeared > about 2 hours after the big bang. We know that this monopoles can form in > the present day to support LENR transmutation. > > > First, the particle is a Higgs field condensate and is tachyonic. The > Higgs field is a tachyonic field. This means that the monopole is not > superluminal but represents a disturbance in the Higgs field. > > > The lecture is informative from the start and is well worth the time to > view it in total. It explains how the Higgs field fits into both the > standard model and the standard cosmological model. It shows the math, and > then it explains the way dissimilar Higgs field interact. > > > For your convenience, I placed the video pointer of the lecture at 52:58 > to show the Higgs field spacifics. > > > This area of cosmology is well developed and can be accessed for further > study by googling "topological defect in the higgs field" > > > Transmutation in LENR is caused by the "higgs abyss" (for further study > google). The Higgs mechanism distorts the function of quarks due to their > mass redefinition. > > > In my opinion, Keith's presentation is the most significant presentation > of this conference and reveals the true nature of the NAE and the science > that supports it. > > > What is interesting about Keith Fredericks findings is that these > monopoles form spontaneously from the environment as well as those being > produced in LENR experiments. Keith Fredericks calls these particles cosmic > background. He shows them as the agent that produce tracks (strange > radiation) where matter loss occurs. > > > https://youtu.be/seBwiL9InII?t=3178 > > -- > Jürg Wyttenbach > Bifangstr. 22 > 8910 Affoltern am Albis > > +41 44 760 14 18 > +41 79 246 36 06 > >
Re: [Vo]:The Higgs field and LENR
Axil: Even if you post this nonsense 10 more times it will never help to explain the world. It's just a "legal" way to generate money for research. I here mention that the breakthrough prize just has been given to a group that has deep connections to the science (physics) self service money laundering system (includes journals, reviewers, politics) for work about gravity that nobody ever will use as it is even more outraging than the Higgs... All mass in the universe can be given as EM mass. CERN never ever will find or has found a Higgs or an other fantasy particles like quarks. The Higgs masses are simple proton *resonances *and the quarks are the same. A *resonance *is not a particle. The same holds for magnetic monopoles. Magnetic flux travels at light speed and only strange minds can believe such a flux can be generated/stopped out of nothing with an infinitely strong force - when you e.g. use the outdated Einstein GER. For all the "strange ideas" above completely new physics will be needed with almost no relation to current definitions. Thus if you can provide something - e.g. vacuum fluctuations - that explain how EM-flux is generated out of nothing then you will be a hero & I would like It! To say it once more the gravitation constant is given by the weak force in SO(4) (generated by the complete coupled 5D charge rotation). It is "absolutely exact"= as measured and also explains why gravitation is not absolutely constant, because the coupling mass (electron weak force bound orbit) in the 3D,t frame is slightly varying in nuclei with larger Z. J.W. On 13.09.2019 03:53, Axil Axil wrote: Keith Fredericks http://restframe.com/mm/authors/keith-fredericks/ has presented his research on what he calls superluminal particles which are magnetic monopoles at ICCS22. I found the theory that could underpins Keith's finding in a cosmology course from MIT. It involves the formation of a topological defect in the Higgs field. This defect forms when a new Higgs field is created and the Higgs field combines with the new Higgs field. This defect in the Higgs field forms a magnetic monopole that is huge and powerful. A particle forms that has a mass of 10^20 protons or about a microgram. This energy level produces a Higgs field defect that meets the dense Higgs field level of 10^18GeV. According to cosmology theory, monopoles from Higgs field cooling appeared about 2 hours after the big bang. We know that this monopoles can form in the present day to support LENR transmutation. First, the particle is a Higgs field condensate and is tachyonic. The Higgs field is a tachyonic field. This means that the monopole is not superluminal but represents a disturbance in the Higgs field. The lecture is informative from the start and is well worth the time to view it in total. It explains how the Higgs field fits into both the standard model and the standard cosmological model. It shows the math, and then it explains the way dissimilar Higgs field interact. For your convenience, I placed the video pointer of the lecture at 52:58 to show the Higgs field spacifics. This area of cosmology is well developed and can be accessed for further study by googling "topological defect in the higgs field" Transmutation in LENR is caused by the "higgs abyss" (for further study google). The Higgs mechanism distorts the function of quarks due to their mass redefinition. In my opinion, Keith's presentation is the most significant presentation of this conference and reveals the true nature of the NAE and the science that supports it. What is interesting about Keith Fredericks findings is that these monopoles form spontaneously from the environment as well as those being produced in LENR experiments. Keith Fredericks calls these particles cosmic background. He shows them as the agent that produce tracks (strange radiation) where matter loss occurs. https://youtu.be/seBwiL9InII?t=3178 -- Jürg Wyttenbach Bifangstr. 22 8910 Affoltern am Albis +41 44 760 14 18 +41 79 246 36 06
[Vo]:The Higgs field and LENR
Keith Fredericks http://restframe.com/mm/authors/keith-fredericks/ has presented his research on what he calls superluminal particles which are magnetic monopoles at ICCS22. I found the theory that could underpins Keith's finding in a cosmology course from MIT. It involves the formation of a topological defect in the Higgs field. This defect forms when a new Higgs field is created and the Higgs field combines with the new Higgs field. This defect in the Higgs field forms a magnetic monopole that is huge and powerful. A particle forms that has a mass of 10^20 protons or about a microgram. This energy level produces a Higgs field defect that meets the dense Higgs field level of 10^18GeV. According to cosmology theory, monopoles from Higgs field cooling appeared about 2 hours after the big bang. We know that this monopoles can form in the present day to support LENR transmutation. First, the particle is a Higgs field condensate and is tachyonic. The Higgs field is a tachyonic field. This means that the monopole is not superluminal but represents a disturbance in the Higgs field. The lecture is informative from the start and is well worth the time to view it in total. It explains how the Higgs field fits into both the standard model and the standard cosmological model. It shows the math, and then it explains the way dissimilar Higgs field interact. For your convenience, I placed the video pointer of the lecture at 52:58 to show the Higgs field spacifics. This area of cosmology is well developed and can be accessed for further study by googling "topological defect in the higgs field" Transmutation in LENR is caused by the "higgs abyss" (for further study google). The Higgs mechanism distorts the function of quarks due to their mass redefinition. In my opinion, Keith's presentation is the most significant presentation of this conference and reveals the true nature of the NAE and the science that supports it. What is interesting about Keith Fredericks findings is that these monopoles form spontaneously from the environment as well as those being produced in LENR experiments. Keith Fredericks calls these particles cosmic background. He shows them as the agent that produce tracks (strange radiation) where matter loss occurs. https://youtu.be/seBwiL9InII?t=3178
