[Vo]:\The Light Velocity Casimir Effect\

2010-12-15 Thread francis
Jones, I tripped over this little snippet from one of your replies in May and would only contend that the [snip] Virtual” field particles are probably nothing else than hyperspace particles that cross our 3-D universe from time to time [/snip]are more likely a constant stream

RE: [Vo]:The Light Velocity Casimir Effect

2010-06-01 Thread Jones Beene
In the raum and zeit department, let me make one clarification to the formative hypothesis ... Arguably, the importance of the precise geometry which is known as the Förster radius (2-10 nm) is the most important parameter for a non-conservative Casimir-like effect, if it exists. Why?

RE: [Vo]:\The Light Velocity Casimir Effect\

2010-06-01 Thread Roarty, Francis X
From: Roarty, Francis X Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:41 PM To: 'vortex-l@eskimo.com' Subject: RE: [Vo]:\The Light Velocity Casimir Effect\ Jones Beene said on Tue, 01 Jun 2010 07:54: To close out this rambling Memorial Day excursion - so far it is all a rationalization that overlooks Fran

[Vo]:The Light Velocity Casimir Effect

2010-05-31 Thread Jones Beene
For those who are not over-indulging on the holiday, Fran Roarty recently mentioned this article: “The Light Velocity Casimir Effect” by Ostoma and Trushyk. http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/9911/9911062.pdf … in his continuing effort to frame this difficult concept of a possible

[Vo]:The Light Velocity Casimir Effect

2010-05-30 Thread froarty572
I think there is another type of relativistic effect underlying the numerous claims of   anomalous heat.   Naudts paper on relativistic hydrogen points in the right direction but he fails to elaborate on the unique source of the relativistic environment.   A 1999 paper “The Light Velocity