Jed wrote:
I do not understand what you are saying here. Are you saying that Rossi was
present? Or that that he interfered with the experiment?
I do not think that Levi or his co-authors has said that Rossi was absent.
Only that he played no role in the testing, and he did not touch the
equipmen
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> I do not understand what you are saying here. Are you saying that Rossi
> was present? Or that that he interfered with the experiment?
>
> I do not think that Levi or his co-authors has said that Rossi was absent.
> Only that he played no r
Claudio C Fiorini wrote:
> In the Levi report, the test started 13 of december and ended 17 of
> december. This is compatible with this article. Maybe, it was decided later
> to continue the test after december 15.
>
> This confirms (by the published picture), that during the ongoing
> experimen
According to an article in the swiss journal "NET Journal" that has been
published earlier in february 2013, a group of business partners of Andrea
Rossi visited his "new laboratory" in Ferrara the day 14 of december 2012.
The group saw the ongoing experiment and could take some pictures. The
pictu
4 matches
Mail list logo