The logic of the first law when used to interpret
particular observations suggests this or that as
an explanation.
For example, one can always add another force to nature
to make observations consistent with the logic the first law,
just like one can always add another epicycle to make
observatio
No Harry, 'faith' in logic.
Don't get ratty when someone challenges your preconceptions. Extend the
argument. Is there something I've missed? Is there a point 3, 4... a way
into the argument that Steorn might be on to?
I think not. That's the 1st Law and what it means in a nutshell.
When someone
2 matches
Mail list logo
